An advanced method for time treatment in product lifecycle management models

  • A. Matsokis
  • D. Kiritsis
Conference paper


Time is the only fundamental dimension which exists along the entire life of an artefact and it affects all artefacts and their qualities. Most commonly in PLM models, time is an attribute in parts such as “activities” and “events” or is a separate part of the model (“four dimensional models”) to which other parts are associated through relationships. In this work a generic idea has been developed about how to make better treatment of time in PLM models. The concept is that time should not be one part of the model, but it should be the basis of the model and all other elements should be parts of it. Thus, we introduce the “Duration of Time concept”. According to this concept all aspects and elements of a model are parts of time. A case study demonstrates the applicability and the advantages of the concept in comparison to existing methodologies.


Ontology Model Physical Product Product Lifecycle Management Time Concept System Interoperability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sider T. (2001) Four-dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO 15926-2:2003 Integration of lifecycle data for process plant including oil and gas production facilities: Part 2 – Data model: (April 2009).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    West M. (2004) Some industrial experiences in the development and use of ontologies. EKAW 2004 Workshop on Core Ontologies in Ontology Engineering, pp. 1-14Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batres R, West M, Leal D, Price D, Masaki K, Shimada Y, Fuchino T, Naka Y. (2007) An upper ontology based on ISO 15926. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 31 (5-6), pp. 519-534Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roddick JF, Egenhofer MJ, Hoel E, Papadias D, Salzberg B. (2004) Spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal databases - Hot issues and directions for PhD research. SIGMOD Record, 33 (2), pp. 126-131Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang C, Hammad A. (2005) Spatio-temporal issues in infrastructure lifecycle management systems. Proceedings, 1st Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Toronto, pp. FR-131-1-FR-131-10Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roddick JF, Hornsby K and Spiliopoulou M. (2000) An Updated Bibliography of Temporal, Spatial, and Spatio-temporal Data Mining Research. Temporal, spatial, and spatio-temporal data mining: first international workshop, TSDM 2000, Lyon, France, pp. 147–163. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    PROMISE Research Deliverable 9.2:|, (April 2009).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jun H-B, Kiritsis D, and Xirouchakis P. (2007) A primitive ontology model for product lifecycle meta data in the closedloop PLM. In: Gonςalves RJ, Müller JP, Mertins K, and Zelm M, editors. Enterprise Interoperability II: New Challenges and Approaches, pp. 729-740. London: Springer Verlag;Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsokis A, Kiritsis D. (2009) An Ontology-based Approach for Product Lifecycle Management. Computers in Industry. Special Issue: Semantic Web Computing in Industry. In press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Matsokis
    • 1
  • D. Kiritsis
    • 1
  1. 1.STI-IGM-LICP, ME A1 380, Station 9Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations