Information and Operational Technologies Nexus for Asset Lifecycle Management

  • Andy Koronios
  • Abrar Haider
  • Kristian Steenstrup


Contemporary enterprises rely on accurate and complete information to make optimal decisions. In order to do so must have the ability to harvest information from every repository that will provide them the necessary information for good decisions to be made. Asset managing organisations have in recent times moved towards integrating many of their information systems but have, in most cases, focused on the business process enabling properties of information technologies, and have tended to overlook the role of these technologies in informing the strategic business orientation. In the same vein, asset managing organisations consider IT as a business support area that is there to support business processes or operational technologies to ensure smooth functioning of an asset. However, even these operational technologies are embedded in IT, and they generate information that is fed to various other operational systems and administrative legacy systems. The intertwined nature of operational and information technologies suggest that this information provides for the control of asset management tasks and also acts as an instrument for informed and quality decision support. There exposes the active and dynamic link between IT and corporate governance. The scope of IT governance should, thus, be extended to include the operational technologies so as to develop a unified view of information and operational technologies. This paper attempts to uncover the peculiarities and variances of the relationship between industry specific operational technologies used for asset management and organisational use of mainstream IT applications for business execution. This paper puts forward the proposition that in order to achieve a high degree in data driven decision making particularly at the strategic level of the organisation a confluence of information technology (IT), operational technology (OT) and information management technology (IM) needs to occur.


Asset Management Operational Technology Strategic Level Tactical Plan Tactical Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    IIMM 2006, ‘International Infrastructure Management Manual’, Association of Local Government Engineering NZ Inc, National Asset Management Steering Group, New Zealand, Thames, ISBN 0-473-10685-X.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Narain, R, Yadav, R, Sarkis, J, & Cordeiro, J 2000, ‘The strategic implications of flexibility in manufacturing systems’, International Journal of Agile Management Systems, Vol. 2, No.3, pp.202-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexander, K 2003, ‘A strategy for facilities management’, Facilities, Vol. 21, No. 11/12, pp. 269 – 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inman, RA 2002, ‘Implications of environmental management for operations management’, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 13, No.1, pp.47-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyle, TA 2006, ‘Towards best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility’, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 6-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balch, WF 1994, ‘An Integrated Approach to Property and Facilities Management’, Facilities, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 17-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El Hayek M, Voorthuysen, EV, & Kelly, DW 2005, ‘Optimizing life cycle cost of complex machinery with rotable modules using simulation’, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp-333-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taskinen, T, & Smeds, R 1999, ‘Measuring change project management in manufacturing’, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 19, No. 11, pp. 1168 – 1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gottschalk, P 2006, ‘Information systems in value configurations, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 106, No. 7, pp. 1060-1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murthy, DNP, Atrens, A, & Eccleston, JA 2002, ‘Strategic maintenance management’, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 287-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sherwin, D 2000, ‘A review of overall models for maintenance management’, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 138-164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haider, A 2007, Information Systems Based Engineering Asset Management Evaluation: Operational Interpretations, PhD Thesis, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rudberg, M 2002, Manufacturing strategy: linking competitive priorities, decision categories and manufacturing networks, PROFIL 17, Linkoping Institute of Technology, Linkoping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haider, A 2009, ‘Value Maximisation from Information Technology in Asset Management – A Cultural Study’, 2009 International Conference of Maintenance Societies (ICOMS), 2-4 June, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hess, A. 2007 ‘Presentation to the CIEAM CRC Conference’ June 2007, Australia.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weill P. & Ross, J.W. 2000, IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results’, Harvard Business School Publishing, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steenstrup, K. 2008, ‘IT and OT: Intersection & Collaboration’ Gartner Industry Research, ID No G00161537, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andy Koronios
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abrar Haider
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kristian Steenstrup
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.CRC for Integrated Engineering Asset ManagementBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computer and Information ScienceUniversity of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia
  3. 3.Gartner Inc.BrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations