Introduction and General Theory of Finite Element Method

Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)


The complexity of the physics of electromigration and the stress-induced voiding can be seen in  Chap. 2. In order to model the physics realistically in today’s interconnects so as to obtain better understanding of the physics and to identify key parameters, FEM is needed as pointed out in  Chap. 2. To begin the discussion on FEM applications in electromigration and stress-induced voiding, let us have a basic understanding on the FEM. For readers familiar with FEM, this chapter may be skipped.


Finite Element Method Stress Analysis Joule Heating Finite Element Formulation Partial Differential Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Courant R (1943) Variational methods for the solution of problems in equilibrium and vibrations. Bull Am Math Soc 49:1–23CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turner MJ, Clough RW, Martin HC, Topp LJ (1956) Stiffness and deflection analysis of complex structures. J Aeronaut Sci 23:805–824Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noor AK (1991) Bibliography of books and monographs on finite element technology. Appl Mech Rev 44:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moes N, Cloirec M, Cartraud P, Remacle J-F (2003) A computational approach to handle complex microstructure geometries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:3163–3177CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weide-Zaage K, Dalleaua D, Yu X (2003) Static and dynamic analysis of failure locations and void formation in interconnects due to various migration mechanisms. Mater Sci Semicond Process 6:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen Y-L, Guo YL, Minor CA (2000) Voiding induced stress redistribution and its reliability implications in metal interconnects. Acta Mater 48:1667–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen HV, Salm C, Wenzel R, Mouthaan AJ, Kuper FG (2002) Simulation and experimental characterization of reservoir and via layout effects on electromigration lifetime. Microelectron Reliab 42:1421–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang YW, Bower AF, Xia L, Shih CF (1999) Three dimensional finite element analysis of the evolution of voids and thin films by strain and electromigration induced surface diffusion. J Mech Phys Solids 47:173–199CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuroda S, Kawai Y, Onoda H, Nishi K (1991) Viscoelasticity-based time-dependent stress model for a submicron aluminum interconnect. IEDM, pp 713–716Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wallace B, Lee Y-H, Pantuso D, Wu K, Mielke N (1999) Thermo-mechanical stress-induced voiding in a tungsten-AlCu interconnect system. In: 37th annual international reliability physics symposium, pp 303–309Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Im S, Banejee K, Goodson KE (2002) Modeling and analysis of via hot spots and implications for ULSI interconnect reliability. In: 40th annual international reliability physics symposium, pp 336–345Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang TC, Yao CH, Wan WK, Hsia CC, Liang MS (2003) Numerical modeling and characterization of the stress migration behavior upon various 90 nanometer Cu/low-k interconnects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international interconnect technology conference, pp 207–209Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen F, Chanda K, Gill I, Angyal M, Demarest J, Sullivan T, Kontra R, Shinosky M, Li J, Economikos L, Hoinkis M, Lane S, McHerron D, Inohara M, Boettcher S, Dunn D, Fukasawa M, Zhang BC, Ida K, Ema T, Lembach G, Kumar K, Lin Y, Maynard H, Urata K, Bolom T, Inoue K, Smith J, Ishikawa Y, Naujok M, Ong P, Sakamoto A, Hunt D, Aitken J (2005) Investigation of CVD SiCOH low-k time-dependent dielectric breakdown at 65 nm node technology. In: Proceedings of the international reliability physics symposium, pp 501–507Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsu R, McPherson JW, McKee WR (2000) Leakage and breakdown reliability issues associated with low-k dielectrics in a dual-damascene Cu process. In: IEEE 38th annual international reliability physics symposium, San Jose, California, pp 348–353Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zienkiewicz OC (1977) The finite element method, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Becker EB, Carey GF, Oden JT (1981) Finite elements: an introduction, vol I. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moaveni S (1999) Finite element analysis: theory and application with ANSYS. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swanson Analysis System, Inc (1999) ANSYS theory reference, 5.6 edn. Swanson Analysis System, Inc., HoustonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    White FM (1988) Heat and mass transfer. Addison-Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rohsenow WM, Hartnett JP, Ganic EJ (1985) Handbook of heat transfer fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970), Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dieter GE (1988) Mechanical metallurgy. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ANSYS, Inc (2009) ANSYS parametric design language guide, 12th edn. ANSYS, Inc., CanonsburgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cher Ming Tan
    • 1
  • Zhenghao Gan
    • 2
  • Wei Li
    • 3
  • Yuejin Hou
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Electrical & Electronic EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Technology Research & DevelopmentSemiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corp.ShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Singapore Institute of Manufacturing TechnologySingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations