Lasers for Treatment of Vascular Lesions

  • Daniel Michael
  • Suzanne Kilmer


Lasers for the treatment of vascular lesions are continually improving using the principles of selective photothermolysis.

Important variables to consider in the treatment of vascular lesions are size, depth, and composition.

Effective treatment of vascular lesions requires tailoring the light wavelength, fluence, and pulse duration to the specifics of the targeted lesion.


Pulse Width Vascular Lesion Infantile Hemangioma Intense Pulse Light Thermal Relaxation Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1.  1.
    Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Microvasculature can be selectively damaged using dye lasers: a basic theory and experimental evidence in human skin. Lasers Surg Med. 1981;1(3):263-276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2.  2.
    Dai T et al. Comparison of human skin opto-thermal response to near-infrared and visible laser irradiations: a theoretical investigation. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(21):4861-4877.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3.  3.
    Kimel S et al. Vascular response to laser photothermolysis as a function of pulse duration, vessel type, and diameter: implications for port wine stain laser therapy. Lasers Surg Med. 2002;30(2):160-169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4.  4.
    Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220(4596):524-527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5.  5.
    Glassberg E et al. The flashlamp-pumped 577-nm pulsed tunable dye laser: clinical efficacy and in vitro studies. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1988;14(11):1200-1208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6.  6.
    No D et al. Pulsed alexandrite laser treatment of bulky vascular malformations. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32(S15):1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7.  7.
    Li L et al. Comparison study of a long-pulse pulsed dye laser and a long-pulse pulsed alexandrite laser in the treatment of port wine stains. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008;10(1):12-15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8.  8.
    Eremia S, Li CY. Treatment of face veins with a cryogen spray variable pulse width 1064 nm Nd:YAG Laser: a prospective study of 17 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(3):244-247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9.  9.
    Randeberg LL et al. Methemoglobin formation during laser induced photothermolysis of vascular skin lesions. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):414-419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barton JK et al. Cooperative phenomena in two-pulse, two-color laser photocoagulation of cutaneous blood vessels. Photochem Photobiol. 2001;73(6):642-650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bahmer F et al. Recommendation for laser and intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in dermatology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007;5(11):1036-1042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bjerring P, Christiansen K, Troilius A. Intense pulsed light source for treatment of facial telangiectasias. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2001;3(4):169-173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silver L. Argon laser photocoagulation of port wine stain hemangiomas. Lasers Surg Med. 1986;6(1):24-8, 52-5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dixon JA, Rotering RH, Huether SE. Patient’s evaluation of argon laser therapy of port wine stain, decorative tattoo, and essential telangiectasia. Lasers Surg Med. 1984;4(2):181-190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tan OT, Murray S, Kurban AK. Action spectrum of vascular specific injury using pulsed irradiation. J Invest Dermatol. 1989;92(6):868-871.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dierickx CC et al. Thermal relaxation of port-wine stain vessels probed in vivo: the need for 1–10-millisecond laser pulse treatment. J Invest Dermatol. 1995;105(5):709-714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bolognia JL et al. Dermatology, vol. 2. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Incorporated; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kauvar A. Laser treatment of vascular lesion. In: Goldman M, Weiss R, eds. Advanced Techniques in Dermatologic Surgery. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006:185-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adrian RM, Tanghetti EA. Long pulse 532-nm laser treatment of facial telangiectasia. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(1):71-74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Apfelberg DB, Bailin P, Rosenberg H. Preliminary investigation of KTP/532 laser light in the treatment of hemangiomas and tattoos. Lasers Surg Med. 1986;6(1):38-42, 56-7.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dummer R et al. Treatment of vascular lesions using the VersaPulse variable pulse width frequency doubled neodymium:YAG laser. Dermatology. 1998;197(2):158-161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kohout MP et al. Arteriovenous malformations of the head and neck: natural history and management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(3):643-654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morelli JG, Weston WL. Pulsed dye laser treatment of hemangiomas. In: Tan OT, ed. Management and Treatment of Benign Cutaneous Vascular Lesions. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1992.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tomson N et al. The treatment of port-wine stains with the pulsed-dye laser at 2-week and 6-week intervals: a comparative study. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(4):676-679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yohn JJ et al. Lesion size is a factor for determining the rate of port-wine stain clearing following pulsed dye laser treatment in adults. Cutis. 1997;59(5):267-270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Orten SS et al. Port-wine stains. An assessment of 5 years of treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(11):1174-1179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Renfro L, Geronemus RG. Anatomical differences of port-wine stains in response to treatment with the pulsed dye laser. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129(2):182-188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fishman SJ, Mulliken JB. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations of infancy and childhood. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1993;40(6):1177-1200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haggstrom AN et al. Prospective study of infantile hemangiomas: demographic, prenatal, and perinatal characteristics. J Pediatr. 2007;150(3):291-294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Williams EF III et al. Hemangiomas in infants and children. An algorithm for intervention. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2(2):103-111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leaute-Labreze C et al. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2649-2651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Astner S, Anderson RR. Treating vascular lesions. Dermatol Ther. 2005;18(3):267-281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Uebelhoer NS et al. Comparison of stacked pulses versus double-pass treatments of facial acne with a 1, 450-nm laser. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(5):552-559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity of California, Davis, Medical CenterSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Department of DermatologyUniversity of California, Davis, Medical Center, Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Northern CaliforniaSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations