Skip to main content

Dressings/Wound Care for Laser Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lasers in Dermatology and Medicine
  • 2532 Accesses

Abstract

Ablative and non-ablative lasers have different effects on the skin. Various postoperative treatments have been used, e.g., topical agents and/or dressings (open vs closed techniques).Additional research is needed to determine the optimal postoperative care after laser procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chajchir A, Benzaquen I. Carbon dioxide laser resurfacing with fast recovery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005;29:107-112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Single-pass carbon dioxide laser versus multiple-pass Er:YAG laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of postoperative wound healing and side effects. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(1):80-84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sadick NS. Update on non-ablative light therapy for rejuvenation: a review. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32:120-128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis, precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220:524-527.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ross EV, McKinlay JR, Anderson RR. Why does carbon dioxide resurfacing work? a review. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:444-454.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kunzi-Rapp K, Dierickx CC, Cambier B, Drosner M. Minimally invasive skin rejuvination with erbium:YAG laser used in thermal mode. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:899-907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Willey A, Anderson RR, Azpiazu JL, et al. Complications of laser dermatologic surgery. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:1-15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan HHL, Lam L, Wong DSY, Wei WI. Role of skin cooling improving patient tolerability of Q-switched alexandrite (QS alex) laser in nevus of Ota treatment. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32:148-151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho DD, London R, Zimmerman GB, Young DA. Laser-tattoo removal: a study of the mechanism and the optimal treatment strategy via computer simulations. Lasers Surg Med. 2002;30:389-397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293-294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. New method for assessing epidermal wound healing: the effects of triamcinolone acetonide and polyethelene film occlusion. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;71:382-384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eaglstein WH. Effect of occlusive dressings on wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 1984;2(3):107-111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in superficial wounds. J Surg Res. 1983;35:142-148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ono I, Suda K, Iwatsuki K, Kaneko F. Evaluation of cytokines in donor site wound fluids. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1994;28(4):269-273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nemeth AJ, Eaglstein WH, Taylor JR, Peerson LJ, Falanga V. Faster healing and less pain in skin biopsy sites treated with an occlusive dressing. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(11):1679-1683.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisenberg M. The effect of occlusive dressings on re-epithelializations of wounds in children with epidermolysis bullosa. J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21(10):892-894.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis SC, Badiavas E, Rendon-Pellerano MI, Pardo RJ. Histological comparison of postoperative wound care regimens for laser resurfacing in a porcine model. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:387-393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berwald C, Levy JL, Magalon G. Complications of the resurfacing laser: a retrospective study of 749 patients. Ann Chir Plast Esthét. 2004;49:360-365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kilmer SL, Chotzen VA, Silva SK, McClaren ML. Safe and effective carbon dioxide laser skin resurfacing of the neck. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:653-657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. “Inert” vehicles do affect wound healing. J Invest Dermatol. 1980;74:90-91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walia S, Alster TS. Cutaneous CO2 laser resurfacing infection rate with and without prophylactic antibioitics. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:857-861.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Messingham MJ, Arpey CJ. Update on the use of antibiotics in cutaneous surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:1068-1078.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Christian LM, Graham JE, Padgett DA, Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Stress and wound healing. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2006;13:337-346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Andersen F, Hedegaard K, Petersen TK, Bindslev-Jensen C, Fullerton A, Andersen KE. The hairless guinea-pig as a model for treatment of cumulative irritation in humans. Skin Res Technol. 2006;12:60-67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Andersen F, Hedegaard K, Petersen TK, Bindslev-Jensen C, Fullerton A, Andersen KE. Anti-irritants I: dose-response in acute irritation. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55:148-154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shibata S. A drug over the millennia: pharmacognosy, chemistry, and pharmacology of licorice. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2000;120:849-862.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Finney RS, Somers GF. The antiinflammatory activity of glycyrrhetinic acid and derivatives. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1958;10:613-620.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schleimer RP. Potential regulation of inflammation in the lung by local metabolism of hydrocortisone. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1991;4:166-173.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mehle AL, Mertz PM. Optimal use of an occlusive dressing to enhance healing. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(3):392-395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mertz PM, Marshall DA, Eaglstein WH. Occlusive wound dressings to prevent bacterial invasion and wound infection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:434-440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mertz PM, Davis SC, Cazzaniga A, Drosou A, Eaglstein W. Barrier and antibacterial properties of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate derived wound treatment films. J Cutan Med Surg. 2003;7(1):1-12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oliveria MF, Davis SC, Mertz PM. Can occlusive dressing composition influence proliferation of bacterial wound pathogens? Wounds. 1998;10(1):4-11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hutchinson JJ. Prevalence of wound infection under occlusive dressings: a collective survery of the literature. Wounds. 1989;1:123-133.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Newman JP, Fitzberald P, Koch RJ. Review of closed dressings after laser resurfacing. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:562-571.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith TJ. Squalene: potential chemopreventive agent. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2000;9:1841-1848.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Owen RW, Giacosa A, Hull WE, et al. Olive-oil consumption and health: the possible role of antioxidants. Lancet Oncol. 2000;1:107-112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mast BA, Diegelmann RF, Krummel TM, Cohen IK. Scarless wound healing in the mammalian fetus. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:441-451.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Colwell AS, Longaker MT, Lorenz HP. Fetal wound healing. Front Biosci. 2003;1:s1240-s1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen WY, Abatangelo G. Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7:79-89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pudden JF, Allen J. The clinical acceleration of healing with a cartilage preparation. J Am Med Assoc. 1965;192:352-356.

    Google Scholar 

  41. King S. Catrix: an easy-to-use collagen treatment for wound healing. Br J Community Nurs. 2005;10:s31-s34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Purna SK, Babu M. Collagen based dressings-a review. Burns. 2000;26:54-62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tanzi EL, Perez M. The effect of a mucopolysaccharide-cartilage complex healing ointment on Er:YAG laser resurfaced facial skin. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:305-308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Grassi A, Palermi G, Paradisi M. Study of tolerance and efficacy of cosmetic preparations with lenitive action in atopic dermatitis in children. Clin Ter. 2000;151:77-80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lautenschlage S, Wulf HC, Pittelkow MR. Photoprotection. Lancet. 2007;370:528-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ke MS, Soriano T, Lask GP. Optimal treatments for hyperpigmentation. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006;8:7-13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gross RL. The effect of ascorbate on wound healing. Int Ophthamol Clin. 2000;40:51-57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Alster T, Lupton JR. Treatment of complications of laser skin resurfacing. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:279-284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kasraee B, Handjani F, Aslani FS. Enhancement of the depigmenting effect of hydroquinone and 4-hydroxyanisole by all-trans-retinoic acid (tretinoin): the impairment of glutathione-dependent cytoprotection? Dermatology. 2003;206:289-291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nanni CA, Alster TS. Complications of cutaneous laser surgery: a review. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24:209-219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Katz BE, MacFarlane DF. Atypical facial scarring after isotretinoin therapy in a patient with previous dermabrasion. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;30:852-853. s.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gold MH. Topical silicone gel sheeting in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. A dermatologic experience. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993;19:912-916.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Fulton JJ. Silicone gel sheeting for the prevention and management of evolving hypertrophic and keloid scars. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21:947-951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Carney S, Cason CG, Gowar JP, Stevenson JH, McNee J, Groves AR. Cica-care gel sheeting in the management of hypertrophic scarring. Burns. 1994;20:163-167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Zurada JM, Kriegel D, Davis IC. Topical treatments for hypertrophic scars. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:1024-1031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen C. Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, S.C., Perez, R. (2011). Dressings/Wound Care for Laser Treatment. In: Nouri, K. (eds) Lasers in Dermatology and Medicine. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-281-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-281-0_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-280-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-281-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics