Advertisement

A Framework for Designing Interfaces in Public Settings

  • Stuart Reeves
Part of the Human-Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

This core chapter develops an analytic framework for public interfaces that shows how many current design approaches can be related to one another through a few underlying concepts. In doing so, it draws on studies presented in previous chapters as well as a range of example interfaces and studies of interaction, especially from interactive art and performance. The framework is introduced in this chapter in an incremental manner, across four main sections. The first section considers the roles of performer and spectator through a basic separation of notions of public and private settings, and through this breaks down performative action into a performer’s manipulations (including gestures around an interface) and effects of those manipulations (including effects reflected back upon the performer). The second section reviews a wide variety of interactive systems, from mobile devices to interactive installations and performances, examines how manipulations and effects are variously hidden, partially-hidden, revealed or even augmented in particular combinations in order to create different spectator experiences. Developing this, four broad design strategies are identified: ‘secretive’ interfaces, ‘expressive’ interfaces, ‘magical’ interfaces and ‘intriguing’ interfaces. The third section discusses how a performance is framed within a given setting, leading to the consideration of a simple distinction in how spectators may be ‘inside’ or ‘outside’ of the frame, introducing notions of ‘witting’ and ‘unwitting’ spectators in their experience of performer interactions. Two different specialisms of the spectator role—bystanders (unwitting spectators) and audience (witting spectators)—are also introduced. The fourth section turns to focus on how spectators or performers may transition between roles, as well as considering the nature further specialisms, including participant, orchestrator and actor roles. In the final section, the various elements of the framework are summarised, and in doing so this chapter covers the way in which the frame itself has been subdivided various spatial and conceptual settings.

Keywords

Primary User Audience Member Performance Frame Public Setting Cave Automatic Virtual Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Agre, P.E.: Changing places: contexts of awareness in computing. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 16(2–4), 177–192 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aoki, P.M., Grinter, R.E., Hurst, A., Szymanski, M.H., Thornton, J.D., Woodruff, A.: Sotto Voce: exploring the interplay of conversation and mobile audio spaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 431–438. ACM, New York (2002). doi: 10.1145/503376.503454 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E., Henderson, A., Lopes, C.: Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 415–422. ACM, New York (2002). doi: 10.1145/503376.503450 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benford, S., Crabtree, A., Reeves, S., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Sheridan, J.G., Dix, A.: The frame of the game: blurring the boundary between fiction and reality in mobile experiences. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), April, pp. 427–436. ACM, New York (2006). doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benford, S., Giannachi, G.: Performing Mixed Reality. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011, in press) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benford, S., Schnädelbach, H., Koleva, B., Anastasi, R., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., Green, J., Ghali, A., Pridmore, T., Gaver, B., Boucher, A., Walker, B., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., Gellersen, H., Steed, A.: Expected, sensed, and desired: a framework for designing sensing-based interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12(1), 3–30 (2005). doi: 10.1145/1057237.1057239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bowers, J.: TONETABLE: A multi-user, mixed media, interactive installation. In: Proceedings of COST G-6 Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-01) (2001) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowers, J.: Improvising machines: Ethnographically informed design for improvised electro-acoustic music. ARiADATexts (4) (2002). URL http://www.ariada.uea.ac.uk/ariadatexts/ariada4/index4.html
  9. 9.
    Brignull, H., Rogers, Y.: Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2003), pp. 17–24 (2003) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capra, M., Benford, S., Giannaci, G., Flintham, M., Greenhalgh, C., Crabtree, A., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., Farr, J.R.: Deliverable D12.7: Evaluation of Day of the Figurines II, final report from touring Day of the Figurines. Technical report, University of Nottingham (2007) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carpenter, L.: Cinematrix, video imaging method and apparatus for audience participation. US Patent, Nos. 5210604 (1993), 5365266 (1994) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clark, C., Pinch, T.: The Hard Sell. Harper Collins, New York (1995) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crabtree, A., Rodden, T.: Hybrid ecologies: understanding cooperative interaction in emerging physical-digital environments. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 12(7), 481–493 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s00779-007-0142-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dalsgaard, P., Hansen, L.K.: Performing perception—staging aesthetics of interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15(3), 1–33 (2008). doi: 10.1145/1453152.1453156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dix, A., Sheridan, J.G., Reeves, S., Benford, S., O’Malley, C.: Formalising performative interactions. In: Proceedings of 12th International Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems (DSVIS), pp. 15–25 (2005). doi: 10.1007/11752707_2 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dourish, P.: Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dow, S., Lee, J., Oezbek, C., MacIntyre, B., Bolter, J.D., Gandy, M.: Wizard of Oz interfaces for mixed reality applications. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1339–1342. ACM, New York (2005). doi: 10.1145/1056808.1056911 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gaver, W., Beaver, J., Benford, S.: Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 233–240. ACM, New York (2003). doi: 10.1145/642611.642653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geser, H.: Towards a sociological theory of the mobile phone. Unpublished report (2001) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York (1959) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row, New York (1974) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grudin, J.: Interface. In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), pp. 269–278. ACM, New York (1990). doi: 10.1145/99332.99360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harrison, S., Dourish, P.: Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: CSCW’96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 67–76. ACM, New York (1996). doi: 10.1145/240080.240193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heath, C., Luff, P., vom Lehn, D., Cleverly, J.: Crafting participation: designing ecologies, configuring experience. Vis. Commun. 1, 9–34 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huhtamo, E.: On the origins of the virtual museum. In: Nobel Symposium (NS120) on Virtual Museums and Public Understanding of Science and Culture (2002) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. International Library of Sociology and Social Reconstruction. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1944) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lamont, P., Wiseman, R.: Magic in Theory: An Introduction to the Theoretical and Psychological Elements of Conjouring. University of Hertfordshire Press, Hatfield (1999) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lasen, A.: A comparative study of mobile phone use in London, Madrid and Paris (2002). http://www.surrey.ac.uk/dwrc/papers/CompStudy.pdf. Unpublished report
  29. 29.
    vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J.: Exhibiting interaction: conduct and collaboration in museums and galleries. Symb. Interact. 24(2), 189–216 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    vom Lehn, D., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P., Heath, C.: Engaging constable: revealing art with new technology. In: CHI’07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1485–1494. ACM, New York (2007). doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marshall, J., Benford, S., Pridmore, T.: Deception and magic in collaborative interaction. In: CHI’10: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York (2010). doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753397 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marx, G.T.: Murky conceptual waters: The public and the private. Ethics Inf. Technol. 3(3), 157–169 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Niemi, J., Sawano, S., Waern, A.: Involving non-players in pervasive games. In: CC’05: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing, pp. 137–140. ACM, New York (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1094562.1094583 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Paradiso, J.: The Brain Opera technology: New instruments and gestural sensors for musical interaction and performance. J. New Music Res. 28(2), 130–149 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design. Wiley, New York (2002) Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reeves, S., Benford, S., O’Malley, C., Fraser, M.: Designing the spectator experience. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 741–750 (2005). doi: 10.1145/1054972.1055074 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rosen, C.: Piano Notes: The Hidden World of the Pianist. Penguin, Baltimore (2002) Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003) Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sanneblad, J., Holmquist, L.E.: “Why is everyone inside me?!” Using shared displays in mobile computer games. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC) (2004) Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schnädelbach, H., Koleva, B., Flintham, M., Fraser, M., Izadi, S., Chandler, P., Foster, M., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T.: The Augurscope: A mixed reality interface for outdoors. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2002). doi: 10.1145/503376.503379 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sheridan, J., Dix, A., Lock, S., Bayliss, A.: Understanding interaction in ubiquitous guerrilla performances in playful arenas. In: Proceedings of British HCI Conference (2004) Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Smith, J.: Digital dance hall: the fan culture of dance simulation arcade games. In: O’Hara, K., Brown, B. (eds.) Consuming Music Together. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 35, pp. 193–209 (2006). doi: 10.1007/1-4020-4097-0_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stewart, J., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A.: Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration. In: CHI’99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 286–293. ACM, New York (1999). doi: 10.1145/302979.303064 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sudnow, D.: Ways of the Hand: The Organization of Improvised Conduct. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1978) Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Terrenghi, L., Quigley, A., Dix, A.: A taxonomy for and analysis of multi-person-display ecosystems. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 13(8), 583–598 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s00779-009-0244-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vogel, D., Balakrishnan, R.: Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. In: UIST’04: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 137–146. ACM, New York (2004). doi: 10.1145/1029632.1029656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Watson, R.: Ethnomethodology, consciousness and the self. J. Conscious. Stud. 5(2), 202–223 (1998) Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wilson, S.: Information Arts: Intersections of Art, Science and Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002) Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Z, P.: Audible image/visible sound: Donald Swearingen’s Living Off The List. 21st Century Music 8(1) (2000) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Horizon Digital Economy ResearchUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations