Advertisement

Experimental Studies in Face Transplantation: Swine Model

  • Yur-Ren Kuo
Chapter

Abstract

Face composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) was recently achieved in a human subject. However, the side effects of long-term immunosuppression and chronic rejection still need to be concerned. The goal of this chapter is to introduce swine hemifacial transplantation for preclinical studies. To design the hemifacial orthotopic transplant consisted of ear cartilage, auricular nerve, parotid gland and lymphoid tissue, muscle with surrounding hemifacial skin paddle, the vascular territories of the composite flap supplied by the superficial temporal artery, and its branches originating from the carotid artery were defined by angiography anatomic studies. The experimental results revealed that this model is suitable to investigate the new strategies for preclinical facial allotransplantation studies. Monitoring and modulation of early rejection in allo-skin and gland lymphoid tissue is a useful strategy to evaluate CTA survival.

Keywords

Common Carotid Artery Parotid Gland Large Animal Model External Jugular Vein Superficial Temporal Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

CsA

cyclosporine A

CTA

composite tissue allotransplantation

MHC

major histocompatibility complex

References

  1. 1.
    Gorantla VS, Barker JH, Jones JW Jr, et al. Immunosuppressive agents in transplantation: mechanisms of action and current anti-rejection strategies. Microsurgery. 2000;20:420-429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tobin GR, Breidenbach WC III, Pidwell DJ, et al. Transplantation of the hand, face, and composite structures: evolution and current status. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34:271-278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dubernard JM, Owen E, Herzberg G, et al. Human hand allograft: report on first 6 months. Lancet. 1999;353:1315-1320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Devauchelle B, Badet L, Lengele B, et al. First human face allograft: early report. Lancet. 2006;368:203-209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siemionow M, Gordon CR. Overview of guidelines for establishing a face transplant program: a work in progress. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:1290-1296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hettiaratchy S, Randolph MA, Petit F, et al. Composite tissue allotransplantation-a new in plastic surgery? Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:381-391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siemionow M, Oke R, Ozer K, et al. Induction of donor-specific tolerance in rat hind-limb allografts under antilymphocyte serum and cyclosporine A protocol. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:1095-1103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuo YR, Huang CW, Goto S, et al. Alloantigen-pulsed host dendritic cells induce T-cell regulation and prolong allograft survival in a rat model of hindlimb Allotransplantation. J Surg Res. 2009;153:317-325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gunther E, Walter L. Comparative genomic aspects of rat, mouse and human MHC class I gene regions. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;91:107-112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yuhki N, Beck T, Stephens RM, et al. Comparative genome organization of human, murine, and feline MHC class II region. Genome Res. 2003;13:1169-1179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chardon P, Renard C, Vaiman M. The major histocompatibility complex in swine. Immunol Rev. 1999;167:179-192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Antczak DF. Structure and function of the major histocompatibility complex in domestic animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1982;181:1030-1036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Demir Y, Ozmen S, Klimczak A, et al. Tolerance induction in composite facial allograft transplantation in the rat model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1790-1801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ulusal BG, Ulusal AE, Ozmen S, et al. A new composite facial and scalp transplantation model in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1302-1311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shengwu Z, Qingfeng L, Hao J, et al. Developing a canine model of composite facial/scalp allograft transplantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;59:185-194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silverman RP, Banks ND, DeTolla LJ, et al. A heterotopic primate model for facial composite tissue transplantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:209-216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuo YR, Shih HS, Lin CC, et al. Swine hemi-facial composite tissue allotransplantation: a model to study immune rejection. J Surg Res. 2009;153:268-273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuo YR, Sacks JM, Wu WS, et al. Porcine heterotopic composite tissue allograft transplantation as a large animal model for pre-clinical study. Chang Gung Med J. 2006;29:268-274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee WP, Yaremchuk MJ, Pan YC, et al. Relative antigenicity of components of a vascularized limb allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:401-411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cendales LC, Kanitakis J, Schneebergerc S, et al. The Banff 2007 working classification of skin-containing composite tissue allograft pathology. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1396-1400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryChang Gung Memorial Hospital – Kaohsiung Medical CenterKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations