The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation (IRHCTT) was founded in 2002 and its purpose was to collect detailed information from every case of hand and face transplantation providing a unique opportunity for the teams to share their experiences and to keep abreast of the latest developments. The registry of face transplantation presents some peculiar characteristics as face is considered a complex “organ” constituted of anatomic parts with different functions. In the Registry facial deficits are expressed as “aesthetic units,” adding also the depth of the defect; and in the procedure section, it is not only important to report the transplanted aesthetic units but also to detail all the grafted tissues, vascular anastomoses, nerve repairs, and eventual additional surgical procedures. Immunosuppressive regimen, rejection episodes, side effects, or other complications are fully reported. The evaluation of outcomes is difficult as disfigurement involves different parts of face with loss of various functions. Consequently, it is important to evaluate both aesthetic and functional results, detailing the recovered functions, such as swallowing, eating and drinking, speaking, or opening and closing eyelids. Two items, such as “Psychological and social acceptance” and “Patient satisfaction and general well-being” are also reported as the goal of face transplantation is to allow the patient to have a social life and improved quality of life.
Rejection Episode Nerve Repair Dash Score Anatomic Part Motion Recovery
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Composite tissue allotransplantation
functional magnetic resonance imaging
International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test
Weinstein Enhanced Sensory
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Lanzetta M, Petruzzo P, Margreiter R, Dubernard JM, et al. The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation. Transplantation. 2005;15(79):1210-1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzetta M, Petruzzo P, Dubernard JM, et al. Second report (1998–2006) of the International Registry of Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2007;18:1-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruzzo P, Lanzetta M, Dubernard JM, et al. The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation. Transplantation. 2008;86:487-492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon CR, Siemionow M, Coffman K, et al. The Cleveland clinic FACES score: a preliminary assessment tool for identifying the optimal face transplant candidate. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:1969-1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubernard JM, Lengele B, Morelon E, et al. Outcomes 18 months after the first human partial face transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2451-2460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hivelin M, Siemionow M, Grimbert P, Lantieri L. Extracorporeal photopheresis: from solid organs to face transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2009;21:117-128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cendales LC, Kanitakis J, Schneeberger S, et al. The Banff 2007 working classification of skin-containing composite tissue allograft pathology. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1396-1400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraux P, Sirigu A, Schneider F, Dubernard JM. Cortical reorganization in motor cortex after graft of both hands. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003;16:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965.Google Scholar