Informed Consent for Facial Transplantation

  • Katrina A. Bramstedt


Facial transplantation is a complex and innovative technique still in its infancy, thus it is critical that the informed consent process has integrity. The patient population is vulnerable due to their desire for esthetic change amid a society that places much value on personal appearance. The technology of transplant, itself, requires an alliance between the doctor and patient due to matters of behavioral and medication compliance. This said, there is much for the patient to know and understand about themselves and the technique, in a setting of many technological unknowns. This chapter describes key elements of the informed consent process for facial transplantation so as to optimize the aim of information transmission, comprehension, and voluntariness.


Graft Loss Informed Consent Process Donor Family Transplant Team Flap Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    US Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Chapter 46 (Protection of Human Subjects), Section 116 (General Requirements for Informed Consent). Accessed April 5, 2010.
  2. 2.
    Greenwald L. Heroes with a Thousand Faces: True Stories of People with Facial Deformities & Their Quest for Acceptance. Cleveland: Cleveland Clinic Press; 2007:252-253.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ye M. Psychological morbidity in patients with facial and neck burns. Burns. 1998;24:646-648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balakrishnan C, Hashim M, Gao D. The effect of partial-thickness facial burns on social functioning. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999;20:224-225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coull F. Personal story offers insight into living with facial disfigurement. J Wound Care. 2003;12:254-258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rumsey N, Clarke A, White P, Wyn-Williams M, Garlick W. Altered body image: appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48:443-453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bradbury E. Understanding the problems. In: Lansdown R, Rumsey N, Bradbury E, Carr T, Partridge J, eds. Visibly Different: Coping with Disfigurement. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997:180-193.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mowlavi A, Bass MJ, Khurshid KA, Milner S, Zook EG. Psychological sequelae of failed scalp replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1573-1579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edgell SE, McCabe SJ, Breidenbach WC, Neace WP, LaJoie AS, Abell TD. Different reference frames can lead to different hand transplantation decisions by patients and physicians. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26:196-200. Erratum in: J Hand Surg [Am]. 2001;26:565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanitakis J, Jullien D, Petruzzo P, et al. Clinicopathologic features of graft rejection of the first human hand allograft. Transplantation. 2003;76:688-693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lanzetta M, Petruzzo P, Vitale G, et al. Human hand transplantation: what have we learned? Transplant Proc. 2004;36:664-668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baumeister S, Kleist C, Döhler B, Bickert B, Germann G, Opelz G. Risks of allogeneic hand transplantation. Microsurgery. 2004;24:98-103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tobin GR, Breidenbach WC, Klapheke MM, Bentley FR, Pidwell DJ, Simmons PD. Ethical considerations in the early composite tissue allograft experience: a review of the Louisville ethics program. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:1392-1395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siegler M. Ethical issues in innovative surgery: should we attempt a cadaveric hand transplantation in a human subject? Transplant Proc. 1998;30:2779-2782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark PA. Face transplantation: part II – an ethical perspective. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:RA41-RA47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiggins OP. On the ethics of facial transplantation research. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:1-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Royal College of Surgeons of England. Facial Transplantation: Working Party Report, 1st ed. November 2003.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Royal College of Surgeons of England. Facial Transplantation: Working Party Report, 2nd ed. November 2006.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Consultative Ethics Committee for the Health and Life Sciences. Opinion No. 82: Composite Tissue Allotransplantation (CTA) of the Face (Full or Partial Face Transplant). February 6, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Facial Transplantation-ASRM/ASPS Guiding Principles. Accessed 13.01.11.
  21. 21.
    Pomahac B, Aflaki P, Nelson C, Balas B. Evaluation of appearance transfer and persistence in central face transplantation: a computer simulation analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:733-738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aflaki P, Nelson C, Balas B, Pomahac B. Simulated central face transplantation: age consideration in matching donors and recipients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:e283-e285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barker JH, Brown CS, Cunningham M, et al. Ethical considerations in human facial tissue allotransplantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:103-109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rumsey N. Psychological aspects of face transplantation: read the small print carefully. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:22-25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Basch SH. The intrapsychic integration of a new organ: a clinical study of kidney transplantation. Psychoanal Q. 1973;42:364-384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Castelnuovo-Tedesco P. Organ transplant, body image, psychosis. Psychoanal Q. 1973;42:349-363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barker JH, Furr LA, McGuire S, et al. Patient expectations in facial transplantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:68-72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 (P.L.104-191). 45 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 160 and 164.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cupples SA, Steslow B. Use of behavioral contingency contracting with heart transplant candidates. Prog Transplant. 2001;11:137-144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bramstedt KA. Living donor transplantation between twins: guidance for donor advocate teams. Clin Transplant. 2007;21:144-147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Renshaw A, Clarke A, Diver AJ, Ashcroft RE, Butler PE. Informed consent for facial transplantation. Transpl Int. 2006;19:861-867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California Transplant Donor NetworkOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations