Alternative Approaches to Face Transplantation: Microsurgical Approach

  • Elliott H. Rose


History was made in the USA in December 2008 when news of the ground-breaking face transplant in a 45-year-old woman was performed by Dr. Maria Siemionow and her team at the Cleveland Clinic. With the flurry of public interest engendered by early transplant success, the debate has been framed by the bio-ethics community regarding the autonomy of the recipient (i.e., informed consent), unpredictable effect on those receiving the transplant (life-long immunosuppression and exposure to medical sequelae), and the influence on society as a whole (economic/cost factors). In view of the high stakes of CTA face transplant surgery (not to mention the large amount of visibility in the press), traditional methods of facial restoration should not be overlooked. Considering the significant morbidity inherent to life-long immunosuppression in the transplant patient, each transplant candidate should be carefully evaluated for conservative options utilizing autogenous tissue to address facial deformity in the decision-making process. The following chapter addresses the salient issues regarding the debate between conventional reconstructive options and face transplantation with a particular focus on promulgating the beneficial aspects of traditional reconstruction in select patients.


Keloid Scar Laser Resurface Face Transplant Canthal Ligament Medical Sequela 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.





composite tissue allotransplantation






  1. 1.
    Siemienow M, Papay F, Alam D, et al. First U.S. near-total human face transplantation – a paradigm shift for massive facial injuries. Lancet. 2009;374:203-209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gordon CR, Siemienow M, Papay F. The world’s experience with facial transplantation: what have we learned thus far? Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:572-578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chinese face transplant Li Guoxing dies. Available at,27574,24829166-23109,00.html Accessed on 20 Dec 2008.
  4. 4.
    Face-and-hands transplant patient dies. Available at: on 15 Jun 2009.
  5. 5.
    Dubernard JM, Lengele B, Morelon E, et al. Outcomes 18 months after the first human partial face transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2451-2460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo S, Han Y, Ahang X, et al. Human facial allotransplantation: a 2-year follow up study. Lancet. 2008;372:631-638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lantieri I, Meningaud JP, Grimbert P, et al. Repair of the lower and middle parts of the face by composite tissue allotransplantation in a patient with massive plexiform neurofibroma: a 1 year follow-up study. Lancet. 2008;372:639-645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morris P, Bradley A, Doyal L, et al. Facial transplantation: Working Party report: 2003. Available at, 2007. Accessed on Nov 2006.
  9. 9.
    Rumsey N. Psychlogical aspects of face transplantation; read the small print carefully. Am J Bioethics. 2004;4:22-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morreim EH. About face: downplaying the role of the press in facial transplantation research. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:27-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barker JH, Brown CS, Cunningham M, et al. Ethical considerations in human facial transplantation. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:103-109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barker JH, Furr A, Cunningham M, et al. Investigation of risk acceptance in facial transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:663-670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siemienow M, Sonmez E. Face as an organ. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:345-352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lengele BG. Current concepts and future challenges in facial transplantation. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;36:507-521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    White BE, Brassington I. Facial allograft transplants: where’s the catch? J Med Ethics. 2008;34:723-726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gordon CR, Siemienow M, Coffman K, et al. The Cleveland Clinic FACES score: a preliminary assessment tool for identifying the optimal face transplant candidate. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:214-220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gordon CR, Nazzal J, Lozano-Calderan SA, et al. From experimental rat hindlimb to clinical face composite tissue allotransplantation: historical background and current status. Microsurgery. 2006;26:566-572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hui-Chou HG, Nam AJ, Rodriguez ED. Clinical composite tissue allotransplantation: a review of the first four global experiences and future implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:538-546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madani H, Hettiaratchy S, Clarke A, et al. Immunosuppression in an emerging field of plastic reconstructive surgery: composite tissue allotransplantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:245-249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menick FJ. Defects of the nose, lips, and cheek: rebuilding the composite defect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:887-898.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Burget G, Walton R. Optimal use of microvascular free flaps, cartilage grafts, and a paramedian forehead flap for aesthetic reconstruction of the nose and adjacent facial units. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rose EH, Norris MS. The versatile temporoparietal fascial flap: adaptability to a variety of composite defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:224-232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rose EH. Prepatterned microsurgical tissue transfers for replacement of aesthetic facial subunits. In: Rose EH, ed. Aesthetic Facial Restoration. Philadelphia: Lipincott-Raven; 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Restoration of the face covering by means of selected skin in regional aesthetic units. Br J Plast Surg. 1956;9:212-221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Menick FJ. Artistry in aesthetic surgery. Aesthetic perception and the subunit principle. Clin Plast Surg. 1987;14:723-735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rose EH. Aesthetic restoration of the severely disfigured face in burn victims: a comprehensive strategy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1573-1585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hyakusoku H, Pennington DG, Gao JH. Microvascular augmentation of the super thin occipito-cervico-dorsal flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47:465-469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chin T, Ogawa R, Murakami M, et al. An anatomical study and clinical cases of “super-thin flaps” with transverse cervical perforators. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:550-555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gao JH, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H, et al. Reconstruction of the face and neck scar contractures using staged transfer of expanded “super thin flaps. Burns. 2007;33:760-763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rose EH. Prepatterned, sculpted free flaps for facial burns. In: Hyakusoku, ed. Chapter 44: Color Atlas of Burn Reconstructive Surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tzakis AG, Reyes J, Zeevi A, et al. Early tolerance in pediatric liver allograft recipients. J Pedatr Surg. 1994;29:754-756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mineo D, Ricordi C. Chimerism and liver transplant tolerance. J Hepatol. 2008;49:478-480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rose EH. Aesthetic Facial Restoration. Philadelphia: Lipincott-Raven; 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryThe Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations