Next-Generation Migratory Emergency Management Application

  • Kay-Uwe Schmidt
  • Veselina Milanova
  • Jörg Dörflinger
  • Susan Marie Thomas
Part of the Human-Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)


In disaster situations there are a lot of experts and decision makers involved and all of them need to share information. It is strongly desirable that everybody engaged is able to exchange information with other experts in order to gain an overview of the current situation. That is where migratory applications would be very helpful. In this chapter we present a migration tool for the disaster management domain that enables the easy exchange of applications and provides task continuity along with changing devices. Decision makers can use the tool to analyze and overlay simulation data and thus elaborate response activities in a faster and more reliable manner.


Disaster Management Target Device Disaster Situation Flood Simulation System Usability Usability Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bandelloni, R., Paternò, F.: Flexible interface migration. In: Proceedings ACM IUI, pp. 148–157. ACM Press (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4, 114–123 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Bharat, K., Cardelli, L.: Migratory applications. In: Proceedings of User Inteface Software and Technology (UIST 95), pp. 133–142 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. Brooke, J.: SUS—a quick and dirty usability scale (1986)Google Scholar
  5. Kramer, J., Magee, J.: Dynamic configuration for distributed systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 11:424–436 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Milojicic, D.S., Douglis, F., Paindaveine, Y., Wheeler, R., Zhou, S.: Process migration. ACM Comput. Surv. 32, 241–299 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pierce, J.S., Nichols, J.: An infrastructure for extending applications user experiences across multiple personal devices. In: UIST, pp. 101–110 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. Ponnekanti, S.R., Lee, B., Fox, A., Hanrahan, P., Winograd, T.: ICrafter: a service framework for ubiquitous computing environments. In: Proceedings of UBICOMP 2001, pp. 56–75 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Sapuntzakis, C.P., Chandra, R., Pfaff, B., Chow, J., Lam, M.S., Rosenblum, M.: Optimizing the migration of virtual computers. SIGOPS 36, 377–390 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sousa, J.P., Garlan, D.: Aura: an architectural framework for user mobility in ubiquitous computing environments. In: The Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (2002)Google Scholar
  11. Wetherall, D.: Active network vision reality: lessons from a capsule-based system. SOSP 34, 64–79 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. White, J.: Mobile agents. In: Software Agents, pp. 437–472. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kay-Uwe Schmidt
    • 1
  • Veselina Milanova
  • Jörg Dörflinger
  • Susan Marie Thomas
  1. 1.SAP ResearchKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations