Skip to main content

Revealed Preferences and the Power of Substitutes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rational Exuberance for Renewable Energy

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 712 Accesses

Abstract

Liquid biofuels—ethanol and biodiesel—are widely recognized, technically feasible alternatives to fossil fuels. Even as the jury is out to determine the environmental footprint of biofuels, the surrounding frenzy has often led to the announcement of unsustainable support prices for feedstock and unviable procurement prices for the finished product. Taking on from the discussion on scarcity in the previous chapter, this chapter makes a detailed assessment of incentive structures facing agriculturists, refiners and the consumers. Data from the Indian market are employed to illustrate the power of substitutes.

Socialism proposes no adequate substitute for the motive of enlightened selfishness that today is at the basis of all human labor and effort, enterprise and new activity

William Howard Taft

27th President, and later 10th Chief Justice of the USA.

This chapter is largely based on, Srinivasan S (April 2009) The food v. fuel debate: a nuanced view of incentive structures, Renew Energy, The Official Journal of the World Renewable Energy Network, Elsevier, Vol. 34(4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.nrega.nic.in.

  2. 2.

    http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/wtotworldw.htm.

  3. 3.

    http://eaindustry.nic.in/; Economic Advisor to the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.

  4. 4.

    See for instance, cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/FS_686206579.

References

  1. Aeck M (2005) Biofuel use growing rapidly. Vital signs. Worldwatch Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aiyar SA (2005) From robber barons to sugar barons, Times of India, Mysore Edition, 4 September 2005

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen BP, Loomis JB (2006) Deriving values for the ecological support function of wildlife: an indirect valuation approach. Ecol Econ 56:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asher M (2006) Don’t call it wasteland, The Times of India, Mysore Edition, 12 October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blanco MI, Azqueta D (2008) Can the environmental benefits of biomass support agriculture?—The case of cereals for electricity and bioethanol production in Northern Spain. Energy Policy 36:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charles MB, Ryan R, Ryan N, Oloruntoba R (2007) Public policy and biofuels: the way forward? Energy Policy 35(11):5737–5746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dasgupta A (2007) Alternative energy: fuelling change. Businessworld, 3 December 2007, pp 88–90

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eaves J, Eaves S (2007) Renewable corn-ethanol and energy security. Energy Policy 35(11):5958–5963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Economist (2006) The ethanol: life after subsidies, The Economist, 9 February 2006

    Google Scholar 

  10. Economist (2007) The advanced biofuels: ethanol, schmethanol. The Economist, 27 September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  11. Economist (2008) The price of conservation: the unkindest cut. The Economist, 14 February 2008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Economist (2008) The ethanol and water: don’t mix. The Economist, 28 February 2008

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eickhout B, Van Meijl H, Tabeau A, Van Rheenen T (2007) Economic and ecological consequences of four European land use scenarios. Land Use Policy 24(3):562–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Express (2005) The new money plant, The New Sunday Express, 4 December 2005

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher M (2007) Researchers examine world’s potential to produce biodiesel, News, University of Wisconsin, Madison. http://www.news.wisc.edu/14307. Accessed 17 October 2007

  16. Flavin C (2008) Time to move to a second generation of biofuels. Worldwatch Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glasgow N, Hansen L (2005) Setting the record straight on ethanol, Renewable Energy Access. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/reinsider/story?id=38601. Accessed 14 November 2005

  18. Handique M (2007) Jatropha may secure energy, but planting schemes fail to bear fruit, liveMint.com. 21 November 2007

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hasan R (2006) The ethanol investment craze, Renewable Energy Access. http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=45231. Accessed 26 June 2006

  20. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) Environmental, economic and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. www.pnas.org. Accessed 25 July 2006

  21. ICRISAT (2007) Pro-poor biofuels outlook for Asia and Africa: ICRISAT’s perspective, Working Paper. www.icrisat.org/Investors/Biofuel.pdf. Accessed March 2007

  22. Jishnu L (2006) Missing the gold in the green, Businessworld, 14 August 2006, pp 48–54

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khosla V (2006) Face value: a healthier addiction, The Economist, 23 March 2006

    Google Scholar 

  24. Narayanan VA (2005) Ethanol alternative, The Indian Express, 11 September 2005

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pulakkat H (2010) Next gen biofuels: clean power, Businessworld, 31 May 2010, p 79

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rajagopal D, Sexton SE, Roland-Holst D, Zilberman D (2007) Challenge of biofuel: filling the tank without emptying the stomach? Environ Res Lett 2:1–9 IOP Publishing Limited, UK

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. REA (2006) South African company to build $1b ethanol plants, Renewable Energy Access. http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=44332. Accessed 13 March 2006

  28. van Eijck J, Romijn H (2008) Prospects for Jatropha biofuels in Tanzania: An Analysis with Strategic Niche Management. Energy Policy 36:311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Viswanath R (2006) Alternative energy: sweet smell of ethanol, Businessworld, 12 June 2006, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  30. Widenoja R, Halweil B (2008) Analysis: banning “bad” biofuels, becoming better consumers. Eye on earth. Worldwatch Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  31. Worldwatch (2008) Grain harvest sets record, but supplies still tight. Vital signs 2007–2008. Worldwatch Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yusoff S (2006) Renewable energy from palm oil—innovation on effective utilization of waste. J Clean Prod 14:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srinivasan Sunderasan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sunderasan, S. (2011). Revealed Preferences and the Power of Substitutes. In: Rational Exuberance for Renewable Energy. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-212-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-212-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-211-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-212-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics