Advertisement

Economic Rents and the Power of Scarcity

  • Srinivasan Sunderasan
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

The previous chapter dealt with the power of choice and concluded that development policy should ensure that the end-users are adequately informed and empowered to make choices for themselves. In the medium-term, fiscal and financial incentives should be geared towards bringing about sufficient awareness and in supporting, rather than supplanting, existing distribution channels for technology options or for financing. In a similar vein, the next chapter analyzes the power of scarcity and highlights the backward drift of surpluses to the owners of the scarce resources: sugarcane farmers in the case of the sugar industry. Even as the sugar industry is studied in detail, the central theme pertaining to scarcity rents is equally applicable to the solar PV industry (silicon wafers), wind energy sector (turbines and sites), small hydro sector (hydro-mechanical equipment and sites) etc.

Keywords

Sugar Industry Command Area Sugar Mill Captive Area Sugarcane Farmer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed F (2009) Sugar: bitter sweet. Businessworld, p 13. Accessed 7 Sept 2009Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allirajan M (2008) Sugar: sweet options. Businessworld. Accessed 18 Jan 2008Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banerjee A, Mookherjee D, Munshi K, Ray D (2001) Inequality, control rights, and rent seeking: sugar cooperatives in Maharashtra. J Political Econ 109(1):138–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bell FW, Lacombe DJ, Ryan MP, May DL (2000) An empirical re-examination of the hotelling valuation principle. J Econ Res 5:1–15Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bulkeley WM (2007) Kodak’s strategy for first printer—cheaper cartridges. The Wall Street J. Accessed 6 Feb 2007Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charness G, Frechette GR, Qin C-Z (2007) Endogenous transfers in the prisoner’s dilemma game: an experimental test of cooperation and coordination. Games Econ Behav 60(2):287–306. 2006MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dutta AP (2009) Indian sugar mills generate as much ‘Green’ energy as windmills, and at half the cost. Down Earth 18(2), Accessed 27 May 2009Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fujiwara-Greve T, Yasuda Y (2009) Cooperation in repeated prisoner’s dilemma with outside options. 20 June 2009. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1092359
  9. 9.
    Gemmill G (1980) Form of function, taste and demand for sugar in seventy-three nations. Eur Econ Rev 13(2):189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghosh S (2002) Electricity consumption and economic growth in India. Energy Policy 30(2):125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gipe P (2009) India’s 1.1 billion move to feed-in tariffs. RenewableEnergyWorld.com. Accessed 6 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Girvan NP (1987) Transnational corporations and non-fuel primary commodities in developing countries. World Dev 15(5):713–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Godbole M (2000) Co‐operative sugar factories in Maharashtra—case for a fresh look. Econ Polit Weekly 35(6):420–424Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric methods and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 34:424–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harris S (1987) Current issues in the world sugar economy. Food Policy 12(2):127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haya B, Kirpekar S, Ranganathan M (2005) A sweet choice for power? evaluating climate change financing for sugar mill cogeneration in India. University of California at Berkeley, Breslauer symposium, Paper 12. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=ucias
  17. 17.
    Hearne RR, Easter WK (1997) The economic and financial gains from water markets in Chile. Agric Econ 15(3):187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoffmann R, Ging LC, Ramasamy B, Yeung M (2005) FDI and pollution: a granger causality test using panel data. J Int Dev 17(3):311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hotelling H (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 39:137–175Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hughes H, Singh S (1978) Economic rent: incidence in selected metals and minerals. Resour Policy 4(2):135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jishnu L, Srivastava S (2005) Sugar: cane wars; Sugar is suddenly hot. And so is the fight for capacity and leadership. Businessworld. Accessed 29 Aug 2005Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kilima FTM (2006) Are price changes in the world market transmitted to markets in less developed countries? A case study of sugar, cotton, wheat, and rice in Tanzania, IIIS Discussion Paper No.160, June 2006Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krivonos E, Olarreaga M (2006) Sugar prices, labour income and poverty in Brazil. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3874, April 2006Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu LC, Hsu C Ed, Younis MZ (2008) The association between government expenditure and economic growth: granger causality test of US Data, 1947–2002. J Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 20(4):439–452. http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=edhsu
  25. 25.
    Mbohwa C, Fukuda S (2003) Electricity from bagasse in Zimbabwe. Biomass and Bioenergy 25(2):197–207Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mehra R (2006) The equity premium in India. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper 12434, August 2006Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Menon S (2009) Merchant power: to cap or not to cap. Businessworld p 22. Accessed 14 Sept 2009Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miller MH, Upton CW (1985) A test of the hotelling valuation principle. J Polit Econ 93(1):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    MNRE (2008) Annual report of the ministry of new and renewable energy, Government of India, 2007–2008, p 47Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Noble PM, Gruca TS (1999) Industrial pricing: theory and managerial practice. Mark Sci 18(3):435–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nopany C (2008) Insider view: nothing sweet about it, Businessworld, 2008. http://www.businessworld.in/index.php/Nothing-Sweet-About-It.html
  32. 32.
    Pagoulatos E, Sorensen R (1986) What determines the elasticity of industry demand? Int J Ind Org 4(3):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pirard R, Irland LC (2007) Missing links between timber scarcity and industrial overcapacity: lessons from the Indonesian pulp and paper expansion. For Policy Econ 9(8):1056–1070Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Purohit P, Michaelowa A (2007) CDM Potential of Bagasse Cogeneration in India. Energy Policy 35(10):4779–4798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rowse JG, Copithorne LW (1982) Natural resource programming models and scarcity rents. Resour Energy 4(1):59–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith RP, Sola M, Spagnolo F (2000) The prisoners’ dilemma and regime-switching in the Greek–Turkish arms race. J Peace Res 37:737–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Smouse SM, Staats GE, Rao SN, Goldman R, Hess D (1998) Promotion of biomass cogeneration with power export in the Indian sugar industry. Fuel Process Technol 54(1):227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Subramani MR (2006) Mills wrangle for sugarcane in UP. The Hindu—BusinessLine, 17th Jan 2006. http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2006/01/17/stories/2006011701651200.htm
  39. 39.
    Subramaniam K (2009) The power of shortage. Businessworld, pp 38–39. Accessed 28 Sept 2009Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sunnevag KJ (2000) Designing auctions for offshore petroleum lease allocation. Resour Policy 26(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Verdurous Solutions Private LimitedKuvempunagar, MysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations