Infant Industry and Incentive Structures

  • Srinivasan Sunderasan
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


The infant industry argument has persisted through most of industrial era history in one form or the other. While in the mercantilist era, government intervention through subsidies, tariffs, quotas and other fiscal measures, and through non-tariff barriers to imports, has been justified by the face-off between the “developed” and the “developing” worlds, the virtual collapse of national borders and the consequent vertical-disintegration-of-production-processes has spawned new theories. The lines of reasoning have shifted to “mature industries versus emerging technology” or between the so called entrenched “old economy” sectors against the sunrise “new economy” sectors.


Industrial Policy Technological Capability Mature Industry Infant Industry Entrepreneurial Competence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Altenburg T, Meyer-Stamer J (1999) How to promote clusters: policy experiences from Latin America. World Dev 27(9):1693–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bell M, Ross-Larson B, Westphal LE (1984) Assessing the performance of infant industries. J Dev Econ 16(1–2):101–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chesshire J, Surrey J (1985) Energy technology acquisition for third world development. Energy Policy 13(4):316–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Das S, Srinivasan K (1997) Duration of firms in an infant industry: the case of Indian computer hardware. J Dev Econ 53(1):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dervis K, Page M Jr (1984) Industrial policy in developing countries. J Comp Econ 8(4):436–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Economist (2006) Economic focus: searching for the invisible man. The Economist Print Edition, 9th MarchGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Economist (2009) Industrial design. The Economist Print Edition, 1st OctoberGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grabowski R (1994) The successful developmental state: where does it come from? World Dev 22(3):413–422CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee J (1997) The maturation and growth of infant industries: the case of Korea. World Dev 25(8):1271–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu X, White S (2001) Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Res Policy 30(7):1091–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melitz MJ (2005) When and how should infant industries be protected? J Int Econ 66(1):177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohyama A, Braguinsky S, Murphy KM (2004) Entrepreneurial ability and market selection in an infant industry: evidence from the Japanese cotton spinning industry. Rev Econ Dyn 7(2):354–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Okada A (2004) Skills development and interfirm learning linkages under globalization: lessons from the Indian automobile industry. World Dev 32(7):1265–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Panda H, Ramanathan K (1996) Technological capability assessment of a firm in the electricity sector. Technovation 16(10):561–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saure P (2007) Revisiting the infant industry argument. J Dev Econ 84(1):104–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Verdurous Solutions Private LimitedMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations