Incentives and Contracting for Availability: Procuring Complex Performance

Part of the Decision Engineering book series (DECENGIN)


Procuring complex performance where both the performance required and the infrastructure to support the requirement are complex, is the current frontier on procurement knowledge. Trends to bundle contracts for products and services together exemplify the challenge. These product-service bundles take the form of contracts for the use of the product (e.g., including long term maintenance and support) rather than just the product as an artefact. Such contracts bind a Prime contractor and the customer into complex long term agreements. Contractual incentive mechanisms have long been used to align the interests of customer and supplier in such projects. This chapter explores the use and role of incentives in complex engineering support environment, drawing on a case study from recent research on availability contracting to support fighter jets. The chapter presents the challenge to the conventional incentive mechanisms inherent in the combination of flexibility and cost control required in contracting for jet fighters availability.


Supply Chain Business Model Incentive Scheme Incentive Mechanism Complex Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. T.S. Baines, H.W. Lightfoot, S. Evans, A. Neely, R. Greenough, J. Peppard, R. Roy, E. Shehab, A. Braganza, A. Tiwari, J.R. Alcock, J.P. Angus, M. Bastl, A. Cousens, P. Irving, M. Johnson, J. Kingston, H. Lockett, V. Martinez, P. Michele, D. Tranfield, I.M. Walton, H. Wilson, State-of-the-art in product service-systems. Proc. I MECH. E Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 221(10), 1543–1552 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Broome, Procurement routes for partnering (Thomas Telford Publishing, London, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. N.D. Caldwell, M. Howard (eds.), Procuring complex performance: Studies of innovation in product-service management (Routledge Taylor Francis, New York, 2010) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  4. N.D. Caldwell, J.K. Roehrich, A.C. Davies, Procuring complex performance: T5 and PFI compared. J. Purch. Supply. Manag. 15(3), 178–186 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. M.A. Cohen, N. Agrawal, V. Agrawal, Winning in the aftermarket. Harv. Bus. Rev. 84(5), 129–138 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. A. Davies, Moving base into high-value integrated solutions: A value stream approach. Ind. Corp. Change 13(5), 727–756 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Dyer, H. Singh, The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(4), 660–679 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. K Goffin, New C, Customer support and new product development & An exploratory Study. Int J of Oper & Prod Manag. 21(3), 275–301 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Huxham, S. Vangen, Doing things collaboratively: Realizing the advantage or succumbing to inertia? Org. Dynam. 33(2), 190–201 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Lamming, Beyond partnership: Strategies for innovation and lean supply (Prentice Hall, Basingstoke, 1993)Google Scholar
  11. M.A. Lewis, J. Roehrich, Contracts, relationships and integration: Towards a model of the procurement of complex performance. Int. J. Proc. Manag 2(2), 125–142 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Ministry of Defence, Deloitte, Defence support review: Phase 1 report (Refresh), 2010 (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  13. O.K. Mont, Clarifying the concept of product-service system. J. Clean. Prod. 10(3), 237–245 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Normann, R. Ramirez, From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 71(4), 65–77 (1993)Google Scholar
  15. T. Rose, K. Manley, A conceptual framework to investigate the optimisation of financial incentive mechanisms in construction projects. International symposium on procurement systems. The impact of cultural differences and systems on construction performance. Feb 7–10 (Las Vegas, USA, 2005)Google Scholar
  16. H.M. Sapolsky, Inventing systems integration, in The business of systems integration, ed. by A. Prencipe, A. Davies, M. Hobday (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004), pp. 15–34Google Scholar
  17. M. Spring, L. Araujo, Service, services and products: Rethinking operations strategy. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 29(5), 444–467 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Spring, K. Mason, Business models for complex performance: Procuring aerospace engineering design services, in Procuring complex performance, ed. by N.D. Caldwell, M. Howard (Routledge Press, New York, 2010)Google Scholar
  19. G. Sturgess, Commissions and concessions: A brief history of contracting for complexity in the public sector, in Procuring complex performance, ed. by N.D. Caldwell, M. Howard (Routledge Press, New York, 2010)Google Scholar
  20. M. Thierry, M. Salomon, J.V. Nunen, L.V. Wassenhove, Strategic issues in product recovery management. Calif. Manag. Rev. 37(2), 114–135 (1995)Google Scholar
  21. H.M. Treasury, Guidance no. 58: Incentivisation (Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, 1991)Google Scholar
  22. A. Tukker, U. Tischner, Product-services as a research field: Past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 1552–1556 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Vandermerwe, J. Rada, Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. Eur. Manag. J. 6(4), 315–324 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. S.L Vargo, R.F Lusch, From goods to servive(s): Divergences and convergences of logics. Ind. Mark. Manag. 37(3), 254–259 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. R. Wise, P. Baumgartner, Go downstream—The new profit imperative in manufacturing. Harv. Bus. Rev. 77 (Sept–Oct), 133–141 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of BathBathUK
  2. 2.BAE SystemsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations