Integrated Approach to Maintenance and Capability Enhancement

Proposal of a Maintenance Dashboard Framework
  • Emma Kelly
  • Svetan Ratchev
Part of the Decision Engineering book series (DECENGIN)


In the current climate, the industrial sector is increasingly characterised by longer product life cycles and asset availability demands. There is likely to be a reduction in the number of major acquisition projects in the future. This, combined with organisational changes and the fact that both governmental and commercial sectors are steering towards contracting for capability, has led to an internal shift in manufacturing centric companies. These traditional companies are now providing service offerings for their products, thereby reducing customer oriented risk. The services aspect includes the use of new technologies and methods for managing technical products over their life cycle and ensuring that customers’ required capability and availability demands are met. This imposes new challenges on subsequent maintenance, repair and capability enhancement procedures. A framework for the development of a Maintenance Dashboard is proposed. The underlying purpose being to establish an approach that supports the decision-making process on whether to maintain, repair, upgrade or update a given asset. Through incorporating maintenance and capability enhancement, both facets are considered in their entirety as opposed to in isolation. The proposed framework aims to direct key asset status information at the various stakeholders involved while an asset is deemed ‘active’, thus aiding consistent decision-making which may ultimately be related to KPI management.


Application Model Preventive Maintenance Product Life Cycle Requirement Elicitation Maintenance Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aerosystems International, Sapphire. Available at: (2003)
  2. T. Baines, H. Lightfoot, S. Evans et al., State-of-the-Art in Product Service Systems, in Proceedings. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 221, 1543–1552 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. S. Brax, A manufacturer becoming service provider: Challenges and a paradox. Manag. Serv. Qual. 15, 142–155 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Davies, Are firms moving downstream into high value services?, in Service innovation, series on technology management, vol. 9, ed. by J. Tidd, F. Hull (Imperial College Press, London, 2003)Google Scholar
  5. H. Demirkan, R. Kauffman, J. Vayghanb et al., Service oriented technology and management: Perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. J. Electr. Commer. Res. Appl. 7, 356–376 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. EPSRC, Research challenges in manufacturing: An industry consultation. Available at: (2009)
  7. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson et al., Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software (Addison-Wesley, New Jersey, 1995)Google Scholar
  8. P. Hewitt, The Government’s Manufacturing Strategy (Department for Trade and Industry) (2002)
  9. A. Jardine, L. Daming, D. Banjevic, A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition based maintenance. Mech. Syst. Signal. Process. 20, 1483–1510 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Kingston, Designing knowledge based systems: The CommonKADS design model. Knowl. Based. Syst. 11, 311–319 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ministry of Defence (MoD), Defence industrial strategy. Defence white paper (CM6697) (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 2005)Google Scholar
  12. Ministry of Defence (MoD), Acquisition operating framework. Available at: (2009)
  13. A. Neely, Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing. Oper. Manag. Res. 1, 103–118 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. I.C.L. Ng, R.S. Maull, L. Smith, in 2010 volume in Service Science: Research and innovations (SSRI) in the Service Economy Book Series, ed. by H. Demirkan, H. Spohrer, V. Krishna. Embedding the new discipline of service science (Springer, New York, ISSN: 1865-4924, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  15. J. Niemann, S. Tichkiewitch, E. Westkamper, Design of sustainable product life cycles (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. B. Nuseibeh, S. Easterbrook, Requirements engineering: A roadmap. Proc. Conf. Future Softw. Eng. 1, 35–46 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Pagotto, S. Walker, Capability engineering—Transforming defence acquisition in Canada. Proc. SPIE Def. Secur. Symp. 1, 89–100 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. S. Ratchev, E. Urwin, D. Muller et al., Knowledge based requirement engineering for one-of-a-kind complex systems. Knowl. Based Syst. 16, 1–5 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. T. Rosqvist, K. Laakso, M. Reunanen, Value-driven maintenance planning for a production plant. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94, 97–110 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rotor and Wing, Making maintenance manageable. Available at: (2005)
  21. G. Schreiber, B. Wielinga, R. de Hoog et al., CommonKADS: A comprehensive methodology for KBS development. IEEE Expert. 9, 8–37 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Schreiber, H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden et al., Knowledge engineering and management: The CommonKADS methodology (The MIT Press, Massachusetts, 2000)Google Scholar
  23. G. Selinger, H.-J. Kim, S. Kernbaum et al., Approaches to sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Manuf. 1, 58–77 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. A. Shanks, Technology management in warship acquisition. Proc. Int. Naval. Eng. Conf. 1, 1–11 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. R. Stevens, P. Brook, K. Jackson et al., Systems engineering: Copying with complexity (Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead, 1998)Google Scholar
  26. S. Takata, F. Kimura, F. van Houten et al., Maintenance: Changing role in life cycle management. Ann. CIRP Manuf. Tech. 53, 1–13 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. W. Wang, Condition based maintenance modelling, in Complex system maintenance handbook, ed. by K. Kobbacy, D. Prahakbar Murth (Springer, London, 2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Precision Manufacturing Centre, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations