The first mention of the problem that would later become known as Pappus’s problem can be found in the introduction to the Conica (I, 1) by Apollonius. There he writes that Euclid had insufficiently worked out the problem of the locus in the case of three or four lines and that the results of Euclid were not even that good. Apollonius refers to the work of Euclid on conics, which is now lost. He attributes the shortcomings of Euclid to the unavailability of two relevant fundamental theorems that Apollonius himself found and proved. We will see further on which theorems these are.
KeywordsLine Segment Continuous Movement Geometric Algebra Plane Curf Admissible Curf
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Knorr, W.R., The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. New York, Dover Publications Inc., 1993.Google Scholar
- Grootendorst, A.W., Grepen uit de Geschiedenis van de Wiskunde. Delft, D.U.P., 1988.Google Scholar
- Wickefoort crommelin, H.S.M. van, Johan de Witt en zijn Tijd. Amsterdam, Nederlandse Algemene Maatschappij van Levensverzekering “Conservatrix,” 1913.Google Scholar
- Heath, sir thomas L., Apollonius of Perga, Treatise on Conic Sections. Cambridge, Barnes and Noble (reprint), 1961.Google Scholar
- Bos, H.J.M., Descartes, Pappus’s Problem and the Cartesian Parabola, a Conjecture, Festschrift for D.T. Whiteside, ed. P. Harman and A. Shapiro. Cambridge, C.U.P.,1992Google Scholar
- Descartes, rené, The Geometry of René Descartes, translated from the French and Latin by David Eugene Smith and Maria L. Latham. New York, Dover Publications, 1954.Google Scholar
- Dijksterhuis, E.J., De Elementen van Euclides I&II.Groningen, Noordhoff, 1930.Google Scholar
- Maanen, J.A. van, Facets of Seventeenth Century Mathematics in the Netherlands. Utrecht, Elinkwijk, 1987.Google Scholar