Artificial Immunity Based Cooperative Sustainment Framework for Multi-Agent Systems
Many studies show that the modelling concept of multi-agent systems (MAS) can be very useful for many industries, such as automated production systems, modern distribution centres and warehouses, port container terminals and transportation systems, etc. However, when applying them to real life where unpredictable factors exists that lead to agent failures, they will not be able to perform as expected or even failed completely. A MAS that can withstand and recover from unpredictable failures is much welcomed by many industries that adopt automation as an integral part of their businesses. Therefore, we propose a cooperative sustainment framework to help MAS to recover the failed agent nodes and extend the system life using artificial immunity inspired design. To verify the usefulness of the design, we carry out some experiments and the result is encouraging.
KeywordsProcess Cycle Artificial Immune System Human Immune System Sustainment Operation Robot Base
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Kudenko, D., D. Kazakov, and E. Alonso, (Eds.).: Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems II — Adaptation and Multi-Agent Learning, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2005).Google Scholar
- 3.KES-AMSTA.: Agent and multi-agent systems — technologies and applications — first KES international symposium, KES-AMSTA 2007, Wroclaw, Poland, May 31-June 1, 2007 : proceedings, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2007).Google Scholar
- 4.KES-AMSTA.: Agent and multi-agent systems: technologies and applications — second KES international symposium, KES-AMSTA 2008, Incheon, Korea, March 26-28, 2008, proceedingsn, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2008).Google Scholar
- 5.KES-AMSTA.: Agent and multi-agent systems: technologies and applications — third KES international symposium, KES-AMSTA 2009, Uppsala, Sweden, June 3-5, 2009 ; proceedings KES-AMSTA 2009, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2009).Google Scholar
- 6.Ishida, Y.: Immunity-Based Systems - A Design Perspective, Springer, Germany (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Ishiguro, A., R. Watanabe, and Y. Uchikawa.: An immunological approach to dynamic behavior control for autonomous mobile robots. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems 95. 'Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots', Proceedings. IEEE/RSJ International Conference (1995)Google Scholar
- 9.Ko, A., H.Y.K. Lau, and T.L. Lau.: — General Suppression Control Framework: Application in Self-balancing Robots. in Artificial Immune Systems — 4th International Conference, ICARIS 2005, Banff, Alberta, Canada (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Dasgupta, D.: An artificial immune system as a multi-agent decision support system. in Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1998. 1998 IEEE International Conference on. (1998).Google Scholar
- 11.Lau, H.Y.K. and Wong, V.W.K.: An immunity-based distributed multiagent-control framework. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A — Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, Vol 36(1), pp. 91-108 (2006)Google Scholar
- 12.Lu, S. and H. Lau.: An Immunity Inspired Real-Time Cooperative Control Framework for Networked Multi-agent Systems. in Artificial Immune Systems: 8th International Conference, ICARIS 2009. York, UK (2009)Google Scholar
- 13.Jerne, N.K.: Towards a network theory of the immune system. Annales d'immunologie. 125C: pp. 373-389 (1974)Google Scholar
- 14.Male, D., et al. (Eds.).:Immunology. 7th International ed, Elsevier: Canada (2006)Google Scholar
- 15.Purves, W.K., et al.: Life — The Science of Biology. 6th ed, Sinauer Associates, Inc., USA (2001)Google Scholar
- 16.Player Project.: (2010) Available via http://playerstage.sourceforge.net/index.php?src=stage. Accessed 26 May 2010.