Skip to main content

Updating System Representation by Trajectory Acquisition in a Dynamic Security Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1589 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors propose an optimization method, based on nonlinear programming, for estimating dynamic parameters of power systems. In the proposed procedure, time–domain simulation trajectories are compared with online measurements to update or estimate dynamic parameters. The main advantage of this method is flexibility because it can be adopted for estimating any parameter, such as synchronous machine constants, external network equivalents, constants for frequency-dependent or voltage-dependent loads. The methodology can be applied during online power system operation and provides more reliable database for real-time dynamic security and control: in fact a frequent update of power system dynamic model can guarantee more reliable simulations and, consequently, more effective control. This is an application that can take advantage of wide-area measurement system (WAMS) framework, because this technology can provide the set of synchronized and normalized measurements that are necessary for implementing the proposed optimization algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bialek JW (2004) Recent blackouts in US and Continental Europe: is liberalisation to blame? Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No. CWPE 407. Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Electricity—UCTE (2004) Final Report of the Investigation Committee on the 28 September 2003 Blackout in Italy, April 2004

    Google Scholar 

  3. US Canada Power System Outage Task Force (2004) Final Report on the 14 August 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations, 5 April 2004

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersson G et al (2005) Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4):1922–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horowitz SH, Phadke AG (2003) Boosting immunity to blackouts. IEEE Power Energy Mag 1:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Novosel D, Begovic MM, Madani V (2004) Shedding light on blackouts. IEEE Power Energy Mag 2:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor CW, Erickson DC, Martin KE et al (2005) WACS—wide-area stability and voltage control system: R&D and online demonstration. Proc IEEE 93(5):892–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ilić MD, Allen EH, Chapman JW et al (2005) Preventing future blackouts by means of enhanced electric power systems control: from complexity to order. Proc IEEE 93(11):1920–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De La Ree J, Liu YL, Mili L et al (2005) Catastrophic failures in power systems: causes, analyses, and countermeasures. Proc IEEE 93(5):956–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruno S, De Benedictis M, Delfanti M, La Scala M (2005) Preventing blackouts through reactive rescheduling under dynamical and protection system constraints. In: Proceedings of IEEE PowerTech 2005 conference, St. Petersburg, Russia, 27–30 June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruno S, De Benedictis M, La Scala M (2009) Advanced monitoring and control approaches for enhancing power system security. In: Messina AR (ed) Inter-area oscillations in power systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. David AK, Lin XJ (2002) Dynamic security enhancement in power-market systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(2):431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. La Scala M, Trovato M, Antonelli C (1998) On-line dynamic preventive control: an algorithm for transient security dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(2):601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bronzini M, Bruno S, De Benedictis M, La Scala M, Bose A (2004) Load shedding scheme for response-based control of transient stability. In: Proceedings of the IREP symposium 2004, bulk power system dynamics and control—VI, Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy, 22–27 August 2004

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruno S, De Benedictis M, La Scala M, Bose A (2004) A dynamic optimization approach for wide-area control of transient phenomena, CIGRÉ Session 2004, Rep. C2-208, Paris, France, 29 August–3 September 2004

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shen M, Venkatasubramanian V, Abi-Samra N et al (2000) A new framework for estimation of generator dynamic parameters. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):756–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosterev DN, Taylor CW, Mittelstandt WA (1999) Model validation for the August 10, 1996 WSCC system outage. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(3):967–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Craven RH, George T, Price GB (1994) Validation of dynamic modeling methods against power system response to small and large disturbances. In: Proceedings of CIGRÈ general session, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ljung L (1987) System identification. Theory for the user. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith JR, Hauer JF, Trudnowski DJ (1993) Transfer function identification in power system applications. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(3):1282–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang JC, Chiang HD, Huang CT et al (1995) Identification of excitation system models based on-line digital measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10(3):1286–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hiskens IA (2001) Nonlinear dynamic model evaluation from disturbance measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(4):702–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Depablos J, Centeno V, Phadke AG et al (2004) Comparative testing of synchronized phasor measurement units. IEEE PESGM, Denver, 6–10 June 2004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Bruno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruno, S., La Scala, M. (2011). Updating System Representation by Trajectory Acquisition in a Dynamic Security Framework. In: Anders, G., Vaccaro, A. (eds) Innovations in Power Systems Reliability. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-088-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-088-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-087-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-088-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics