Advertisement

Updating System Representation by Trajectory Acquisition in a Dynamic Security Framework

  • Sergio Bruno
  • Massimo La Scala
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors propose an optimization method, based on nonlinear programming, for estimating dynamic parameters of power systems. In the proposed procedure, time–domain simulation trajectories are compared with online measurements to update or estimate dynamic parameters. The main advantage of this method is flexibility because it can be adopted for estimating any parameter, such as synchronous machine constants, external network equivalents, constants for frequency-dependent or voltage-dependent loads. The methodology can be applied during online power system operation and provides more reliable database for real-time dynamic security and control: in fact a frequent update of power system dynamic model can guarantee more reliable simulations and, consequently, more effective control. This is an application that can take advantage of wide-area measurement system (WAMS) framework, because this technology can provide the set of synchronized and normalized measurements that are necessary for implementing the proposed optimization algorithm.

Keywords

Power System Dynamic Parameter Simulated Trajectory Synchronous Machine Phasor Measurement Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bialek JW (2004) Recent blackouts in US and Continental Europe: is liberalisation to blame? Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No. CWPE 407. Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Electricity—UCTE (2004) Final Report of the Investigation Committee on the 28 September 2003 Blackout in Italy, April 2004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    US Canada Power System Outage Task Force (2004) Final Report on the 14 August 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations, 5 April 2004Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andersson G et al (2005) Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4):1922–1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horowitz SH, Phadke AG (2003) Boosting immunity to blackouts. IEEE Power Energy Mag 1:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Novosel D, Begovic MM, Madani V (2004) Shedding light on blackouts. IEEE Power Energy Mag 2:32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor CW, Erickson DC, Martin KE et al (2005) WACS—wide-area stability and voltage control system: R&D and online demonstration. Proc IEEE 93(5):892–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ilić MD, Allen EH, Chapman JW et al (2005) Preventing future blackouts by means of enhanced electric power systems control: from complexity to order. Proc IEEE 93(11):1920–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De La Ree J, Liu YL, Mili L et al (2005) Catastrophic failures in power systems: causes, analyses, and countermeasures. Proc IEEE 93(5):956–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruno S, De Benedictis M, Delfanti M, La Scala M (2005) Preventing blackouts through reactive rescheduling under dynamical and protection system constraints. In: Proceedings of IEEE PowerTech 2005 conference, St. Petersburg, Russia, 27–30 June 2005Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruno S, De Benedictis M, La Scala M (2009) Advanced monitoring and control approaches for enhancing power system security. In: Messina AR (ed) Inter-area oscillations in power systems. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    David AK, Lin XJ (2002) Dynamic security enhancement in power-market systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(2):431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    La Scala M, Trovato M, Antonelli C (1998) On-line dynamic preventive control: an algorithm for transient security dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(2):601–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bronzini M, Bruno S, De Benedictis M, La Scala M, Bose A (2004) Load shedding scheme for response-based control of transient stability. In: Proceedings of the IREP symposium 2004, bulk power system dynamics and control—VI, Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy, 22–27 August 2004Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bruno S, De Benedictis M, La Scala M, Bose A (2004) A dynamic optimization approach for wide-area control of transient phenomena, CIGRÉ Session 2004, Rep. C2-208, Paris, France, 29 August–3 September 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shen M, Venkatasubramanian V, Abi-Samra N et al (2000) A new framework for estimation of generator dynamic parameters. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):756–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kosterev DN, Taylor CW, Mittelstandt WA (1999) Model validation for the August 10, 1996 WSCC system outage. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(3):967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Craven RH, George T, Price GB (1994) Validation of dynamic modeling methods against power system response to small and large disturbances. In: Proceedings of CIGRÈ general session, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ljung L (1987) System identification. Theory for the user. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith JR, Hauer JF, Trudnowski DJ (1993) Transfer function identification in power system applications. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(3):1282–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang JC, Chiang HD, Huang CT et al (1995) Identification of excitation system models based on-line digital measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10(3):1286–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hiskens IA (2001) Nonlinear dynamic model evaluation from disturbance measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(4):702–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Depablos J, Centeno V, Phadke AG et al (2004) Comparative testing of synchronized phasor measurement units. IEEE PESGM, Denver, 6–10 June 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica ed Elettronica (DEE)Politecnico di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations