Skip to main content

The Purpose of HAMMLAB and the Theoretical Basis for Experimental Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Simulator-based Human Factors Studies Across 25 Years

Abstract

In HAMMLAB, we conduct experimental research on human potentials and limitations in an operational control room environment, focusing both on the interaction among humans and human–machine interaction. The experimental results are used for design, evaluation and safety assessment of complex production systems. The work done in HAMMLAB has traditionally been rooted in the nuclear domain through its central position in the OECD Halden Reactor Project, but in the later years other industries have also been addressed. This chapter explains the purpose of HAMMLAB and describes a general theoretical basis for experimental research. Finally, a position on future methodologies in HAMMLAB is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    PSA is a method based on event-trees and fault-trees. It comprises high-level sequences of important accident scenarios in nuclear power plants. PSA level 1 starts with a set of defined initiating events, e.g., loss of coolant accident (LOCA), and calculates the probability of core damage. PRA is the American wording for the European PSA. HRA is the part that analyses the contribution of human actions to the failure probability, applied with specific HRA methods.

  2. 2.

    This process was formalized and embedded in a strict falsificationist framework by Fisher’s null-hypothesis test (Howell 1997). The research hypothesis (X has an effect on Y) is inverted into a null-hypothesis (X has no effect on Y), followed by a test trying to falsify the latter.

  3. 3.

    In null-hypothesis testing, this is a Type I error (rejecting a true null-hypothesis).

  4. 4.

    In null-hypothesis testing, this is a Type II error (failing to reject a false null-hypothesis).

  5. 5.

    There is not a strict border between quantitative and qualitative measures, in this context the latter term is used for measures that categorize performance in a structured way, but that are not that easily prepared for quantification before the data collection.

  6. 6.

    One may argue though, that in strenuous accident conditions large performance variability will be observed anyhow.

References

  • Bye A, Laumann K, Braarud PØ, Massaiu S (2006) Methodology for improving HRA by simulator studies. In: Stamatelatos MG, Blackman HS (eds) Proceedings of the eighth international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management, PSAM8, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 14–18 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1994) The earth is round (p < .05). Am Psychol 49(12):997–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (1647) Meditations on first philosophy (1980). Aschehoug, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer H (1960) Truth and method, 2nd edn. Sheed and Ward, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel CG (1970) Aspects of scientific explanation: and other essays in the philosophy of science. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg S et al (2004) CSNI technical opinion papers no. 4, human reliability analysis in probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants, OECD 2004, NEA no. 5068

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell DC (1997) Statistical methods for psychology, 4th edn. Wadsworth, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JL (1995) Understanding psychological science. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk RE (1995) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1843) A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the method of scientific investigation (Books I–III). In: Robson JM (ed) The collected works of John Stuart Mill, vol 7. University of Toronto Press/Routledge and Kegan Paul, Toronto/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale JM, Liebert RM (1986) Science and behavior: an introduction to methods of research. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur EJ, Pedhazur Schmelkin L (1991) Measurement, design, and analysis. An integrated approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1935) The logic of scientific discovery (1968). Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell B (1913) On the notion of cause. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Skraaning G (2003) Experimental control versus realism: methodological solutions for simulator studies in complex operating environments. OECD Halden Reactor Project (HPR-361). Dr. philos. dissertation NTNU, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Sträter O (2005) Cognition and safety, an integrated approach to systems design and assessment. Ashgate, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1999) Statistical methods in psychology journals. Guidelines and explanations. Am Psychol 54(8):594–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyrd Skraaning Jr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skraaning, G., Bye, A. (2010). The Purpose of HAMMLAB and the Theoretical Basis for Experimental Research. In: Skjerve, A., Bye, A. (eds) Simulator-based Human Factors Studies Across 25 Years. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-003-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-003-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-002-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-003-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics