Abstract
Consider the positive integers 1,2, 3,4, … Among them there are composite numbers and primes. A composite number is a product of several factors ≠ 1, such as 15 = 3∙5; or 16 = 2∙8. A prime p is characterized by the fact that its only possible factorization apart from the order of the factors is p = 1 p. Every composite number can be written as a product of primes, such as 16 = 2∙2∙2∙2.— Now, what can we say about the integer 1 ? Is it a prime or a composite? Since 1 has the only possible factorization 1’1 we could agree that it is a prime. We might also consider the product 1∙p as a product of two primes; somewhat awkward for a prime number p.—The dilemma is solved if we adopt the convention of classifying the number 1 as neither prime nor composite. We shall call the number 1 a unit. The positive integers may thus be divided into:
-
1.
The unit 1.
-
2.
The prime numbers 2, 3,5,7,11,13,17,19, 23,…
-
3.
The composite numbers 4,6, 8, 9,10,12,14,15,16,…
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
D. N. Lehmer, Factor Table For the First Ten Millions Containing the Smallest Factor of Every Number Not Divisible By 2, 3, 5, Or 7 Between the Limits 0 and 10,017,000 Hafner, New York, 1956. (Reprint)
D. N. Lehmer, List of Prime Numbers From 1 to 10,006,721, Hafner, New York, 1956. (Reprint)
C L. Baker and F. J. Gruenberger, The First Six Million Prime Numbers, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica. Published by Microcard Foundation, Madison, Wisconsin, 1959.
C. L. Baker and F. J. Gruenberger, Primes in the Thousandth Million, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, 1958.
M. F. Jones, M. Lai and W. J. Blundon, “Statistics on Certain Large Primes,” Math. Comp. 21 (1967) pp. 103–107.
Carter Bays and Richard H. Hudson, “On the Fluctuations of Littlewood for Primes of the Form 4n ± 1,” Math. Comp. 32 (1978) pp. 281–286.
A. M. Odlyzko, “Iterated Absolute Values of Differences of Consecutive Primes,” Math. Comp. 61 (1993) pp. 373–380.
A. M. Legendre, Théorie des Nombres, Third edition, Paris, 1830. Vol. 2, p. 65.
D. H. Lehmer, “On the Exact Number of Primes Less Than a Given Limit,” lll. Journ. Math. 3 (1959) pp. 381–388. Contains many references to earlier work.
David C. Mapes, “Fast Method for Computing the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Limit,” Math. Comp. 17 (1963) pp. 179–185.
J. C Lagarias, V. S. Miller and A. M. Odlyzko, “Computing π (x): The Meissel-Lehmer Method,” Math. Comp. 44 (1985) pp. 537–560.
J. C Lagarias and A. M. Odlyzko, “Computing π(x): An Analytic Method,” Journ. of Algorithms 8 (1987) pp. 173–191.
Jan Bohman, “On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Limit,” Nordisk Tidskrift för Informationsbehandling (BIT) 12 (1972) pp. 576–577.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riesel, H. (2011). The Number of Primes Below a Given Limit. In: Prime Numbers and Computer Methods for Factorization. Modern Birkhäuser Classics. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8298-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8298-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-8297-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-8298-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)