Abstract
In this chapter, we consider a common economic activity involving cooperative optimization—joint venture. However, it is often observed that after a certain time of cooperation some firms in a joint venture may gain sufficient skills and technology that they would do better by breaking away from the joint operation. Analysis on time (optimal-trajectory subgame) consistent joint ventures are presented in the following sections.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bleeke, J., Ernst, D.: Collaborating to Compete. Wiley, New York (1993)
Blodgett, L.L.: Factors in the instability of international joint ventures: an event history analysis. Strateg. Manag. J. 13, 475–481 (1992)
Cellini, R., Lambertini, L.: A differential game approach to investment product differentiation. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 27, 51–62 (2002)
Cellini, R., Lambertini, L.: Private and social incentives towards investment in product differentiation. Int. Game Theory Rev. 6(4), 493–508 (2004)
D’Aspremont, C., Jacquemin, A.: Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Am. Econ. Rev. 78(5), 1133–1137 (1988)
Gomes-Casseres, B.: Joint venture instability: is it a problem? Columbia J. World Bus. XXII(2), 97–102 (1987)
Hamel, G., Doz, Y., Prahalad, C.K.: Collaborate with your competitors—and win. Harv. Bus. Rev. 67(1), 133–139 (1989)
Kamien, M.I., Muller, E., Zang, I.: Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Am. Econ. Rev. 82(5), 1293–1306 (1992)
Murray, A.I., Siehl, C.: Joint Venture and Other Alliances: Creating a Successful Cooperative Linkage. Financial Executive Research Foundation, Morristown (1989)
Parkhe, A.: Messy research, methodological predispositions and theory development in international joint ventures. Acad. Manag. Rev. 18(2), 227–268 (1993)
Petrosyan, L.A., Zaccour, G.: Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 27(3), 381–398 (2003)
Shapley, L.S.: A value for N-person games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games, pp. 307–317. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1953)
Suzumura, K.: Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. Am. Econ. Rev. 82(5), 1307–1320 (1992)
Yeung, D.W.K.: Time consistent Shapley value imputation for cost-saving joint ventures. Math. Game Theory Appl. 2(3), 137–149 (2010)
Yeung, D.W.K., Petrosyan, L.A.: Dynamically stable corporate joint ventures. Automatica 42, 365–370 (2006b)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Proof of Proposition 5.2
Appendix: Proof of Proposition 5.2
To prove Proposition 5.2 we first use \(\hat{x}^{j(L)}\), for j∈L, to denote the optimal trajectory of the optimal control problem \(\varpi [L;\tau,x_{\tau} ^{L}]\), which maximizes
subject to
Note that
Similarly, for the optimal control problem \(\varpi [K\backslash L;\tau,x_{\tau} ^{K\backslash L}]\), we have
Now consider the optimal control problem \(\varpi [K;\tau,x_{\tau} ^{K}]\) that maximizes
subject to
Since \(\psi_{j}^{(\tau )K*}(s,\hat{x}^{K(K)}(s))\) and \(\hat{x}^{K(K)}(s)\) are, respectively, the optimal control and optimal state trajectory of the control problem \(\varpi [K;\tau,x_{\tau} ^{K}]\),
Invoking (5.98), (5.99), and (5.100), we have
Hence Proposition 5.2 follows.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yeung, D.W.K., Petrosyan, L.A. (2012). Dynamically Stable Cost-Saving Joint Venture. In: Subgame Consistent Economic Optimization. Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8262-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8262-0_5
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-8261-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-8262-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)