Skip to main content

Dynamic Economic Optimization: Group Optimality and Individual Rationality

  • Chapter
Subgame Consistent Economic Optimization

Abstract

The most appealing characteristic of perfectly competitive markets is that individually rational behaviors bring about group (Pareto) optimality in economic resource allocation. However, the market fails to provide an effective mechanism for optimal resource use because of the prevalence of imperfect market structure, externalities, imperfect information, and public goods in the current global economy. As a result, though the market is one of the most effective instruments in conducting economic activities, it fails to guarantee its efficiency under the current arrangement. The noncooperative outcomes characterized in Chap. 2 vividly demonstrate that Pareto optimality could not be achieved by markets. Removing market suboptimality is not just a task of achieving a better alternative, but sometimes it can be an absolute necessity. For instance, efforts to alleviate the worldwide financial tsunami and catastrophe-bound industrial pollution are currently pressing issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dockner, E.J., Jørgensen, S.: Cooperative and non-cooperative differential game solutions to an investment and pricing problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35, 731–739 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockner, E.J., Long, N.V.: International pollution control: cooperative versus noncooperative strategies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 24, 13–29 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, B.A.: Optimal consumption planning in a polluted environment. Econ. Rec. 49, 534–545 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, B.A.: Optimal pollution control with a nonconstant exponential rate of decay. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2, 1–6 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haurie, A., Zaccour, G.: A differential game model of power exchange between interconnected utilizes. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Athens, Greece, pp. 262–266 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haurie, A., Zaccour, G.: A game programming approach to efficient management of interconnected power networks. In: Hämäläinen, R.P., Ehtamo, H. (eds.) Differential Game-Developments in Modeling and Computation. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, S., Zaccour, G.: Time consistent side payments in a dynamic game of downstream pollution. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 25, 1973–1987 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V., Pohjola, M.: Optimal recovery of a shared resource stock: a differential game with efficient memory equilibria. Nat. Resour. Model. 3, 91–118 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V., Pohjola, M.: Economic development and agreeable redistribution in capitalism: efficient game equilibria in a two-class neoclassical growth model. Int. Econ. Rev. 31, 421–427 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V., Pohjola, M.: Sustainable international agreements on greenhouse warming: a game theory study. Ann. Int. Soc. Dyn. Games 2, 67–87 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala, V., Mäler, K.G., Tulkens, H.: The acid rain game as a resource allocation process with an application to the international cooperation among Finland, Russia and Estonia. Scand. J. Econ. 97, 325–343 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K.-G., de Zeeuw, A.: The acid rain differential game. Environ. Resour. Econ. 12, 167–184 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, S.J., Casino, B.: A note on cooperative versus non-cooperative strategies in international pollution control. Resour. Energy Econ. 24, 251–261 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahvonen, O.: Carbon dioxide abatement as a differential game. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 10, 685–705 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, D.W.K., Petrosyan, L.A.: Subgame consistent cooperative solutions in stochastic differential games. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 120, 651–666 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. K. Yeung .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yeung, D.W.K., Petrosyan, L.A. (2012). Dynamic Economic Optimization: Group Optimality and Individual Rationality. In: Subgame Consistent Economic Optimization. Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8262-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics