A branching law for subgroups fixed by an involution and a noncompact analogue of the Borel-Weil theorem

  • Bertram Kostant
Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 220)


Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra and let t be the subalgebra of fixed elements in g under the action of an involutory automorphism of g. Any such involution is the complexification of the Cartan involution of a real form of g. If V λ is an irreducible finite-dimensional representation of g, the Iwasawa decomposition implies that V λ is a cyclic U(t)module where the cyclic vector is a suitable highest weight vector v λ. In this paper we explicitly determine generators of the left ideal annihilator L λ (t) of v λ in U(t). One of the applications of this result is a branching law which determines how V λ decomposes as a module for t Other applications include (1) a new structure theorem for the subgroup M (conventional terminology) and its unitary dual, and (2) a generalization of the Cartan-Helgason theorem where, in the generalization, the trivial representation of M (using conventional terminology) is replaced by an arbitrary irreducible representation τ of M. For the generalization we establish the existence of a unique minimal representation of g associated to τ.

Another application (3) yields a noncompact analogue of the Borel-Weil theorem. For a suitable semisimple Lie group G and maximal compact subgroup K, where g = (Lie G) and t = (Lie K) the representation V λ embeds uniquely (see [W], §8.5) as a finite dimensional (g, K) submodule V λ of the Harish-Chandra module H(δ, ξ) of a principal series representation of G. The functions in H(δ, ξ) are uniquely determined by their restriction to K. As a noncompact analogue of the Borel-Wei! theorem the functions in V λ are given as solutions of differential equations arising from the generators of L λ(t) (rather than Cauchy-Riemann equations as in the Borel-Weil theorem).


Disjoint Union Left Ideal Cartan Subalgebra Maximal Compact Subgroup Principal Series 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [A]
    S. Araki, On root systems and an infinitesimal classification of irreducible symmetric spaces, J. Math. Osaka City Univ. 13 (1962), 1–34.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [BB]
    A. Beilinson and J. Bernstein, A generalization of Casselman’s submodule theorem, Representation Theory of Reductive Groups, Birkhäuser, Progress in Mathematics, 1982, pp. 35–67.Google Scholar
  3. [C]
    W. Casselman, Differential equations satisfied by matrix coefficients, preprint.Google Scholar
  4. [K1]
    B. Kostant, On the existence and irreducibility of certain series of representations, Lie groups and their representations, I.M. Gelfand, ed., Halsted Press, John Wiley, 1975, pp. 231–329.Google Scholar
  5. [K2]
    _, On Whittaker vectors and representation theory, lnventiones Math. 48 (1978), 101–184.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [K3]
    _, Clifford algebra analogue of the Hopf-Koszul-Samelson theorem, the p-decomposition, C(g) = End VpC(P), and the g-module structure of ∧g, Adv. in Math. 125 (1997), 275–350.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [LW]
    J. Lepowsky and N. Wallach, Finite- and infinite-dimensional representations of linear semisimple groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 184 (1973), 223–246.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [PRV]
    K. R. Parthasarathy, R. Ranga Rao, and V. S. Varadarajan, Representations of complex semisimple Lie groups and Lie algebras, Ann. of Math. (2), 85 (1967), 383–429.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [V]
    D. Vogan, Irreducible characters of semisimple Lie groups IV. Charactermultiplicity duality, Duke Math. J. 49 (1982), 943–1073.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [W]
    N. Wallach, Harmonic analysis on homogeneous spaces, Dekker, 19 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bertram Kostant
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsMITCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations