Advertisement

On Relation Betweeen Expected Regret and Conditional Value-at-Risk

  • Carlos E. Testuri
  • Stanislav Uryasev

Abstract

The paper compares portfolio optimization approaches with expected regret and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) performance functions. The expected regret is defined as an average portfolio underperformance comparing to a fixed target or some benchmark portfolio. For continuous distributions, CVaR is defined as the expected loss exceeding α-Value-at Risk (VaR), i.e., the mean of the worst (1-α) 100% losses in a specified time period. However, generally, CVaR is the weighted average of VaR and losses exceeding VaR. Optimization of CVaR can be performed using linear programming. We formally prove that a portfolio with a continuous loss distribution, which minimizes CVaR, can be obtained by doing a line search with respect to the threshold in the expected regret. An optimal portfolio in CVaR sense is also optimal in the expected regret sense for some threshold in the regret function. The inverse statement is also valid, i.e., if a portfolio minimizes the expected regret, this portfolio can be found by doing a line search with respect to the CVaR confidence level. A portfolio, optimal in expected regret sense, is also optimal in CVaR sense for some confidence level. The relation of the expected regret and CVaR minimization approaches is explained with a numerical example.

Keywords

Line Search Portfolio Optimization Decision Vector Benchmark Portfolio Inverse Statement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Acerbi, C, C. Nordio and C. Sirtori (2001): Expected shortfall as a tool for financial risk management. Working paper, http://www.gloriamundi.org.
  2. [2]
    Acerbi, C, and D. Tasche (2001): On the coherence of expected shortfall. Working paper, http://www.gloriamundi.org.
  3. [3]
    Andersson, F., H. Mausser, D. Rosen, and S. Uryasev (2001): Credit Risk Optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk Criterion. Mathematical Programming, Series B 89, 2001, 273–291.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Artzner, P., F. Delbaen, J.M. Eber, and D. Heat (1997): Thinking Coherently, Risk, Vol. 10, 68–71.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bogentoft E., H.E. Romeijn, and S. Uryasev (2001): Asset/Liability Management for Pension Funds Using CVaR Constraints. The Journal of Risk Finance. Vol. 3, No. 1, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, and R. Rosenthal (1992): GAMS, A User’s Guide. Redwood City, CA: Scientific Press.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cariño, D.R. and W.T. Ziemba (1998): Formulation of the Russell-Yasuda Kasai Financial Planning Model, Operations Research. Vol. 46, No. 4, 443–449.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Dembo, R.S. and A.J. King (1992): Tracking Models and the Optimal Regret Distribution in Asset Location, Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, Vol. 8, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dembo, R.S. and D. Rosen (1999): The Practice of Portfolio Replication: A Practical Overview of Forward and Inverse Problems. Annals of Operations Research. Vol. 85, 267–284.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Embrechts, P. (1999): Extreme Value Theory as a Risk Management Tool, North American Actuarial Journal, vol. 3.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    ILOG (1997): CPLEX, 6.0 ed. Mountain View, CA.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Jobst, N.J. and S.A. Zenios (2001): The Tail That Wags The Dog: Integrating Credit Risk In Asset Portfolios. The Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 3, No. 1, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Harlow, W.V. (1991): Asser Allocation in a Downside-Risk Framework. Fin. Anal. J., Vol. 47, No. 5, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Hurliman, W. (2001): Conditional Value-at-Risk bounds for Compound Poisson Risks and Normal Approximation. MPS: Applied mathematics/0201009. Working Paper, www.mathpreprints.com/math/Preprint/werner.huerlimann/20020111/1/.
  15. [15]
    Konno, H. and H. Yamazaki (1991): Mean Absolute Deviation Portfolio Optimization Model and Its Application to Tokyo Stock Market. Management Science, 37, 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Krokhmal, P., J. Palmquist, and S. Uryasev (2002): Portfolio Optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk Objective and Constraints. The Journal of Risk, Vol. 4, No. 2.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Markowitz, H.M. (1952): Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance. Vol. 7, No. 1, 77–91.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Krokhmal. P., J. Palmquist, and S. Uryasev (2002): Portfolio Optimization with Conditional Value-At-Risk Objective and Constraints. The Journal of Risk, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Pflug, G. Ch. (2000): Some Remarks on the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Value-at-Risk. In. Uryasev S. (Ed.) Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Prekopa, A. (1995): Stochastic Programming, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Rockafellar, R.T. and S. Uryasev (2000): Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. The Journal of Risk, Vol. 2, No. 3.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Rockafellar R.T. and S. Uryasev (2002): Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions. The Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 26, No. 7, 1443–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Uryasev, S. (1995). Derivatives of Probability Functions and Some Applications. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 56, 287–311.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Young, M.R. (1998): A Minimax Portfolio Selection Rule with Linear Programming Solution. Management Science. Vol. 44, No. 5, 673–683.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Ziemba, W.T. and J.M. Mulvey (Eds.) (1998): Worldwide Asset and Liability Modeling, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Zenios, S.A. (Eds.) (1996): Financial Optimization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos E. Testuri
    • 1
  • Stanislav Uryasev
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Science InstituteUniversidad de UruguayMontevideoUruguay
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations