Skip to main content

Not Only Because of Theory: Dyson, Eddington, and the Competing Myths of the 1919 Eclipse Expedition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Einstein Studies ((EINSTEIN,volume 12))

Abstract

One of the most celebrated physics experiments of the twentieth century, a century of many great breakthroughs in physics, took place on May 29th, 1919, in two remote equatorial locations. One was the town of Sobral in northern Brazil, the other the island of Principe off the west coast of Africa. The experiment in question concerned the problem of whether light rays are deflected by gravitational forces, and took the form of astrometric observations of the positions of stars near the Sun during a total solar eclipse. The expedition to observe the eclipse proved to be one of those infrequent, but recurring, moments when astronomical observations have overthrown the foundations of physics. In this case it helped replace Newton’s Law of Gravity with Einstein’s theory of General Relativity as the generally accepted fundamental theory of gravity. It also became, almost immediately, one of those uncommon occasions when a scientific endeavor captures and holds the attention of the public throughout the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan (1976). “Verifying the theory of relativity.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 30, 249–260.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Harry M. and Pinch, Trevor (1993). The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crommelin, Andrew Claude de la Cherois (1919a). “The Eclipse Expedition to Sobral.” The Observatory 42, 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1919b). “Results of the Total Solar Eclipse of May 29 and the Relativity Theory.” Nature 104, 280–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Charles R. (1922). “Observation of the Einstein Displacement in Eclipses of the Sun.” The Observatory 45, 224–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Frank Watson (1917). “On the Opportunity afforded by the Eclipse of 1919 May 29 of verifying Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 77, 445–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Frank Watson, Eddington, Arthur Stanley and Davidson, Charles R. (1920). “A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’ Gravitational Field, from Observations made at the Total Solar Eclipse of May 29, 1919.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A 220, 291–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, John and Glymour, Clark (1980). “The Gravitational Redshift as a Test of General Relativity: History and Analysis.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 11, 175–214.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, John and Glymour, Clark (1981). “Relativity and Eclipses: The British Eclipse Expeditions of 1919 and their Predecessors.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11, 49–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, John and Janssen, Michel (1993). “Einstein’s Explanation of the Motion of Mercury’s Perihelion.” In The Attraction of Gravitation. New Studies in the History of General Relativity, 129–172. John Earman, Michel Janssen, and John D. Norton, eds. Birkhäuser, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, Arthur Stanley (1919). “The Total Eclipse of 1919 May 29 and the Influence of Gravitation on Light.” The Observatory 42, 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, Arthur Stanley and Cottingham, Edwin Turner (1920). “Photographs taken at Principe during the Total Eclipse of the Sun, May 29th.” Report of the Eighty-Seventh Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert (2004). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 9, eds. Diana Kormos Buchwald, Robert Schulmann, Jozsef Illy, Daniel Kennefick and Tilman Sauer. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, C. W. Francis (1980). “Experimental Tests of General Relativity: Past, Present and Future,” in Physics and Contemporary Needs, vol. 4, ed. Riazuddin, 529–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Alfred (1919). Meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society, Friday, June 13, 1919. The Observatory 42, 261–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G. M. (1979). “Gravitational Deflection of Light: A Re-examination of the observations of the solar eclipse of 1919.” The Observatory 99, 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, Stephen (1988). A Brief History of Time. Bantam Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. Spencer (1939). “Sir FrankWatson Dyson.” The Observatory 62, 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunder, E. Walter (1900). The Royal Observatory Greenwich: A glance at its history and work. The Religious Tract Society, London. (Published in electronic form on the internet by Eric Hutton, 2000. Accessed on July 6, 2007 at http://atschool.eduweb.co.uk/bookman/library/ROG/INDEX.HTM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Melotte, P. J. (1953). “Herbert Henry Furner.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 113, 305–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. Andrew andWayman, P. A. (1989). “Relativistic Light Deflections.” The Observatory 109, 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciama, Dennis William (1969). The Physical Foundations of General Relativity. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sponsel, Alistair (2002). “Constructing a ‘revolution in science’: the campaign to promote a favourable reception for the 1919 solar eclipse experiments.” British Journal for the History of Science 35, 439–467.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Mathew (2003). “An Expedition to Heal the Wounds of War: The 1919

    Google Scholar 

  • Eclipse and Eddington and Quaker Adventurer.” ISIS 94, 57–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, John (2002). Fabulous Science: Fact and Fiction in the History of Scientific Discovery. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Published in the United States as Einstein’s Luck: The Truth Behind Some of the Greatest Scientific Discoveries. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, Clifford (1993). Was Einstein Right? Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Center for Einstein Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kennefick, D. (2012). Not Only Because of Theory: Dyson, Eddington, and the Competing Myths of the 1919 Eclipse Expedition. In: Lehner, C., Renn, J., Schemmel, M. (eds) Einstein and the Changing Worldviews of Physics. Einstein Studies, vol 12. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4940-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics