Abstract
Mine is one of several talks at this meeting that consider the revival of relativity and its integration into the mainstream of physics beginning in the 1950s. Ted Newman has described the physics problems that created confusion during the slow period 1930–1950, and how eventually a new generation of young physicists pulled the theory out of its mire. Silvio Bergia has emphasized the changes of thinking that were required, and the importance of the physical insight and especially the geometrical perspective that John Wheeler, among others, brought to the subject. I want to focus on the gulf that opened up during the slow period between relativists and the rest of what I will call mainstream theoretical physics. This gulf is important not just because of the negative influence it exerted on the development of relativity. It also has much to teach us about what physicists expect from a theory of physics, and especially about the role of heuristic concepts in physicists’ communication with one another.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
DeWitt, C’ecile M., and Rickles, Dean (eds.), The Role of Gravitation in Physics: Report from the 1957 Chapel Hill Conference, Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge (Sources 5) (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany, 2011).
Eisenstaedt, Jean (1989), “The low water mark of general relativity, 1925–1955”, in Einstein and the History of General Relativity, eds. Howard, Don; and Stachel, John; Birkh‥auser, Boston, 277–292.
——. (2006), The Curious History of Relativity: How Einstein’s Theory of Gravity Was Lost and Found Again, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Feynman, Richard P. (1988), What Do You Care What Other People Think? W.W. Norton, New York.
Infeld, Leopold (1964), Relativistic Theories of Gravitation, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Isaacson, Richard (1968), Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. 11. Nonlinear Terms and the Effective Stress Tensor. Physical Review 166, 1272–1280.
Robinson, Ivor; Schild, Alfred; and Sch‥ucking, Engelbert L. (1965), Quasi-stellar Sources and Gravitational Collapse, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Schutz, Bernard F. (2009), A First Course in General Relativity (2nd ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Thorne, Kip S. (1994), Black Holes and Time Warps, W.W. Norton, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 The Center for Einstein Studies
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schutz, B.F. (2012). Thoughts About a Conceptual Framework for Relativistic Gravity. In: Lehner, C., Renn, J., Schemmel, M. (eds) Einstein and the Changing Worldviews of Physics. Einstein Studies, vol 12. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4940-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4940-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-4939-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-4940-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)