Skip to main content

Oswald Veblen and the Origins of Mathematical Logic at Princeton

  • Chapter

Abstract

The remarkable transformation from Aristotelean to mathematical logic in the period 1880–1930 was largely a European affair. The important centers of change were all located in Europe.1 Few Americans pursued research in logic, and those who did seldom contributed to mainstream developments.2 By the end of the 1930s, however, the United States had developed an important, indigenous research program in mathematical logic.3 For the first time American faculties were training their own students, making their own research contributions, and publishing their own research journals at levels competitive with the best Europe had to offer.

I appreciate the critical reading of early drafts of this paper by Thomas Drucker, Sheldon Hochheiser, Gregory Moore, and Albert Tucker; information provided by Irving Anellis, John Corcoran, and Dale Johnson; and research assistance from Robbin Clamons and Marek Rostocki.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • American Mathematical Society (1938), Semicentennial Addresses, American Mathematical Society, New York. (Volume 2 of American Mathematical Society Semicentennial Publications.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1931), A memorial to a scholar-teacher, Princeton Alumni Weekly, 30 October 1931, pp. 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, R.C. (1938), A Semicentennial History of the American Mathematical Society 1888–1938, Vol 1, American Mathematical Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspray, W. (1988), The emergence of Princeton as a world center for mathematical research, 1896–1939, in W. Aspray and P. Kitcher (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 344–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienen, L.B. (1970), Notes found in a Klein bottle, Princeton Alumni Weekly, 21 April 1970, pp. 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, G. (1895), Zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre, I, Math. Ann. 46, 481–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, V. (1958), A history of mathematics at Princeton, Princeton Alumni Weekly, 9 May 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, J. (1980), Categoricity, Hist. Philos. Logic 1, 187–207.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, J. (1981), From categoricity to completeness, Hist. Philos. Logic 2,113–119.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, J. (1986), Undefinability tests and the Erlanger program: Historical footnotes, Proceedings, International Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley 1986, p. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1965), The Undecidable: Basic Papers on Undecidable Propositions, Unsolvable Propositions, and Computable Functions, Raven Press, Hewlett, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipert, R. (1978), Development and Crisis in Late Boolean Logic: The Deductive Logics of Peirce, Jevons, and Schröder, Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducasse, C.J. and Curry, H.B. (1963), Early history of the Association for Symbolic Logic. J. Symbolic Logic 27, 255–258. Addendum: J. Symbolic Logic 28, p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, L.P. (1931), The progress of science: Henry Burchard Fine and the Fine Memorial Hall, Scientific Monthly 33, 565–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S. et al. (eds.) (1986), Kurt Gödel Collected Works, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, New York. (Gödel’s Life and Work, pp. 1–36.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, H.B. (unsigned) (1926), The Role of Mathematics, The Princeton Fund Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flexner, A. (1960), Abraham Flexner: An Autobiography, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. (1899), Grundlagen der Geometrie, Teubner, Leipzig. English trans. by E.J. Townsend, Open Court, Chicago, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille, E. (1962), In Retrospect, Notes, Yale Mathematical Colloquium, 16 May 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, E.V. (1902), A complete set of postulates for the theory of absolute continuous magnitude, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 3, 264–279.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, E.V. (1905), A set of postulates for real algebra, comprising postulates for a one-dimensional continuum and for the theory of groups, Trans. Amer. Math.Soc. 56, 17–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (1984), Mathematical Research in the United States from 1890: The Case of the University of Chicago, Hampden-Sydney College, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S.C. (1981), Origins of recursive function theory, Ann. Hist. Comput. 3,52–67.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S.C. (1987), Kurt Gödel, Biographical Memoirs Nat. Acad. Sci. 56, 135–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLane, S. (1976), Oswald Veblen, Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 599–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. (1963), Oswald Veblen, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 69, 26–36.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E.H. (1902), On the projective axioms of geometry, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 3, 142–158.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E.H. (1903), On the foundations of mathematics, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (2), 9, 402–424.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.H. (1988), The emergence of first-order logic, in W. Aspray and P. Kitcher (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 95–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoa, A. (1901), Logique et Histoire des Sciences, Bibliothèque du Congrès International de Philosophie, III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasch, M. (1882), Vorlesungen über neuere Geometrie, Teubner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peano, G. (1889), I principii di geometria, Fratelli Bocca, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peano, G. (1894), Sui fondamenti della geometria, Riv. Mat. 4, 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckhaus, V. (1986), Case studies towards the establishment of a social history of logic, Hist. Philos. Logic 7, 185–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieri, M. (1899), Della geometria elementare come sistema ipotetico deduttivo. Mono-grafia del punto e del moto, Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino (2), 49, 173–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, N. (1981), Refugee mathematicians in the United States of America, 1933 1941: Reception and reaction, Ann. Sci. 38, 313–338.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlan, M. (1982), American Postulate Theorists and the Development of Axiomatic Method, 1901–1930. Ph.D. Dissertation, SUNY, Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1956a), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, trans, by J.H. Woodger. Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1956b), A general theorem concerning primitive notions of Euclidean geometry, Indag. Math. 18, 468–474.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Van Evra, J. (1966), A History of Some Aspects of the Theory of Logic, 1850-Present. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1903), Hilbert’s foundations of geometry, Monist, 13, 303–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1904a), A system of axioms for geometry, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 5, 343–384.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1904b), The Heine-Borel theorem, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 10, 436–439.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1905a), Euclid’s parallel postulate, Open Court 19, 752–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1905b), Definition in terms of order alone in the linear continuum and in well-ordered sets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 6, 165–171.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1905c), Theory of plane curves in nonmetrical analysis situs, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 6, 83–98.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1906), The foundations of geometry: An historical sketch and a simple example, Popular Science Monthly n.v., pp. 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1911), The foundations of geometry, in J.W.A. Young, Mongraphs on Topics of Modern Mathematics, Longmans, Green, New York, Chapter I, pp. 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1922), Analysis Situs, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, volume 5, part 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1923), Geometry and physics, Science 57, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1925), Remarks on the foundations of geometry, Bull Amer. Math. Soc. 31, 121–141.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. (1934), Certain aspects of modern geometry-A course of three lectures, Rice Institute Pamphlets 31, 207–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. and Alexander, J.W. (1913), Manifolds of n dimensions, Acta Math., Series 2,14, 163–178. Veblen, O. and Lennes, N.J. (1907), Introduction to Infinitesimal Analysis, Wiley, New York.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. and Whitehead, J.H.C. (1931), A set of axioms for differential goemetry, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 17, 551–561.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. and Whitehead, J.H.C. (1932), Foundations of Differential Geometry, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, number 29, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. and Young, J.W. (1908), A set of assumptions for projective geometry, Amer. J. Math. 30, 347–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, O. and Young, J.W. (1910/1918), Projective Geometry, 2 volumes (volume two by Veblen), Ginn, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, R.L. (1965), Introduction to The Foundations of Mathematics, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aspray, W. (2008). Oswald Veblen and the Origins of Mathematical Logic at Princeton. In: Drucker, T. (eds) Perspectives on the History of Mathematical Logic. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4769-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4769-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-4768-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-4769-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics