Regulation of Apoptosis via the NFκB Pathway: Modeling and Analysis

Part of the Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology book series (MSSET)

Programmed cell death (or apoptosis) has an essential biological function, enabling successful embryonic development, as well as maintenance of a healthy living organism [6]. Apoptosis is a physiological process which enables an organism to remove unwanted or damaged cells. Malfunctioning apoptotic pathways can lead to many diseases, including cancer and inflammatory or immune system related problems. A family of proteins called caspases are primarily responsible for execution of the apoptotic process: basically, in response to appropriate stimuli, initiator caspases (for instance, caspases 8, 9) activate effector caspases (for instance, caspases 3, 7), which will then cleave various cellular substrates to accomplish the cell death process [22].

Nuclear factor κB (NFκB) is a transcription factor for a large group of genes which are involved in several different pathways. For instance, NFκB activates its own inhibitor (IκB) [14] as well as groups of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes [21]. Among the latter, NFκB activates transcription of a gene encoding for inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP). This protein in turn contributes to downregulate the activity of the caspase cascade which forms the core of the apoptotic pathway [6, 8].


Apoptotic Pathway Caspase Cascade Logical Rule Boolean Model Piecewise Linear System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors thank Peter Scheurich and Monica Schliemann for their many interesting and fruitful discussions.


  1. 1.
    R. Albert and H.G. Othmer. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the drosophila segment polarity genes. J. Theor. Biol., 223:1–18, 2003.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Bernot, J.-P. Comet, A. Richard, and J. Guespin. Application of formal methods to biological regulatory networks: extending Thomas' asynchronous logical approach with temporal logic. J. Theor. Biol., 229:339–347, 2004.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Casey, H. de Jong, and J.L. Gouzé. Piecewise-linear models of genetic regulatory networks: equilibria and their stability. J. Math. Biol., 52:27–56, 2006.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Chaves, T. Eissing, and F. Allgöwer. Bistable biological systems: a characterization through local compact input-to-state stability. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 53:87–100, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Chaves, E.D. Sontag, and R. Albert. Methods of robustness analysis for boolean models of gene control networks. IEE Proc. Syst. Biol., 153:154–167, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N.N. Danial and S.J. Korsmeyer. Cell death: critical control points. Cell, 116:205–216, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. de Jong, J.L. Gouzé, C. Hernandez, M. Page, T. Sari, and J. Geiselmann. Qualitative simulation of genetic regulatory networks using piecewise linear models. Bull. Math. Biol., 66:301–340, 2004.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Eissing, H. Conzelmann, E.D. Gilles, F. Allgöwer, E. Bullinger, and P. Scheurich. Bistability analysis of a caspase activation model for receptor-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem., 279:36892–36897, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Fauré, A. Naldi, C. Chaouiya, and D. Thieffry. Dynamical analysis of a generic boolean model for the control of the mammalian cell cycle. Bioinformatics, 22(14):e124–e131, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Frelin, V. Imbert, V. Bottero, N. Gonthier, A.K. Samraj, K. Schulze-Osthoff, P. Auberger, G. Courtois, and J.F. Peyron. Inhibition of the NF-κB survival pathway via caspase-dependent cleavage of the IKK complex scaffold protein and NF-κB essential modulator NEMO. Cell Death Differ., 15:152–160, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Gedeon. Attractors in continuous-time switching networks. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2:187–209, 2003.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Glass. Classification of biological networks by their qualitative dynamics. J. Theor. Biol., 54:85–107, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Glass and S.A. Kauffman. The logical analysis of continuous, nonlinear biochemical control networks. J. Theor. Biol., 39:103–129, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Hoffmann, A. Levchenko, M.L. Scott, and D. Baltimore. The IκB-NFκB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. Science, 298:1241–1245, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.E.C. Ihekwaba, D. Broomhead, R. Grimley, N. Benson, and D.B. Kell. Sensitivity analysis of parameters controlling oscillatory signalling in the NF-κB pathway: the roles of IKK and IκBα. IEE Syst. Biol., 1:93–103, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Lahav, N. Rosenfeld, A. Sigal, N. Geva-Zatorsky, A.J. Levine, M. Elowitz, and U. Alon. Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat. Genetics, 36:147–150, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Lipniacki, P. Paszek, A.R. Brasier, B. Luxon, and M. Kimmel. Mathematical model of NFκB regulatory module. J. Theor. Biol., 228:195–215, 2004.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.R. McDonald and W.S. El-Deiry. Suppression of caspase-8 and -10-associated RING proteins results in sensitization to death ligands and inhibition of tumor cell growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101:6170–6175, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D.E. Nelson, A.E.C. Ihekwaba, M. Elliott, J.R. Johnson, C.A. Gibney, B.E. Foreman, G. Nelson, V. See, C.A. Horton, D.G. Spiller, S.W. Edwards, H.P. McDowell, J.F. Unitt, E. Sullivan, R. Grimley, N. Benson, D. Broomhead, D.B. Kell, and M.R.H. White. Oscillations in NF-κB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science, 306:704–708, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E.L. O'Dea, D. Barken, R.Q. Peralta, K.T. Tran, S.L. Werner, J.D. Kearns, A. Levchenko, and A. Hoffmann. A homeostatic model of IκB metabolism to control constitutive NFκB activity. Mol. Syst. Biol., 3:111, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    N.D. Perkins. Integrating cell-signalling pathways with NF-κB and IKK function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 8:49–62, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Rehm, H. Düßmann, R.U. Jänicke, J.M. Tavaré, D. Kögel, and J.H.M. Prehn. Single-cell fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis demonstrates that cas-pase activation during apoptosis is a rapid process. J. Biol. Chem., 277:24506–24514, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Schliemann. Modelling and experimental validation of TNFα induced pro- and antiapoptotic signalling. Master's thesis, University of Stuttgart, Germany, 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Schliemann, T. Eissing, P. Scheurich, and E. Bullinger. Mathematical modelling of TNF-α induced apoptotic and anti-apoptotic signalling pathways in mammalian cells based on dynamic and quantitative experiments. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Foundations Systems Biology in Engineering (FOSBE), Stuttgart, Germany, pages 213–218, 2007.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Thomas. Boolean formalization of genetic control circuits. J. Theor. Biol., 42:563–585, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Thomas, D. Thieffry, and M. Kaufman. Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks - i. biological rule of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state. Bull. Math. Biol., 57:247–276, 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.COMOREINRIASophia-AntipolisFrance
  2. 2.Bayer Technologies Services GmbHPT-AS Systems BiologyGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Systems Theory and Automatic ControlUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations