From Network Structure to Dynamics and Back Again: Relating Dynamical Stability and Connection Topology in Biological Complex Systems

  • Sitabhra Sinha
Part of the Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology book series (MSSET)

To see a world in a grain of sand,

And a heaven in a wild flower,

Hold infinity in the palm of your hand,

And eternity in an hour.

– William Blake, Auguries of Innocence Auguries of Innocence

Like Blake, physicists look for universal principles that are valid across many different systems, often spanning several length or time scales. While the domain of physical systems has often offered examples of such widely applicable “laws,” biological phenomena tended to be, until quite recently, less fertile in terms of generating similar universalities, with the notable exception of allometric scaling relations [20]. However, this situation has changed with the study of complex networks emerging into prominence. Such systems comprise a large number of nodes (or elements) linked with each other according to specific connection topologies, and are seen to occur widely across the biological, social and technological worlds [1, 9, 16]. Examples range from the intra-cellular signaling system which consists of different kinds of molecules affecting each other via enzymatic reactions, to the internet composed of servers around the world which exchange enormous quantities of information packets regularly, and food webs which link, via trophic relations, large numbers of inter-dependent species. While the existence of complex networks in various domains had been known for some time, the recent excitement among physicists working on such systems has to do with the discovery of certain universal principles among systems which had hitherto been considered very different from each other.


Degree Distribution Universal Principle Modular Network Connection Topology Distinct Time Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I would like to thank my collaborators with whom the work described here has been carried out, in particular, R. K. Pan, S. Sinha, N. Chatterjee, M. Brede, C. C. Wilmers, J. Saramäki and K. Kaski, as well as S. Vemparala, D. Kumar, K. V. S. Rao and B. Saha for helpful discussions.


  1. 1.
    Achard, S., Salvador, R., Whitcher, B., Suckling, J., Bullmore, E.: A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J. Neurosci., 26 26 , 63–72 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aftabuddin, M., Kundu, S.: Hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged amino acid networks within protein. Biophys. J., 93 93 , 225–231 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albert, R., Barabási, A.L.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286 286 , 509–512 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albert, R., Barabási, A.L.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys., 74 74 , 47–97 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrat, A., Weigt, M.: On the properties of small-world network models. Eur. Phys. J.B, 13 13 , 547–560 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brede, M., Sinha, S.: Assortative mixing by degree makes a network more unstable. Arxiv preprint, cond-mat/0507710 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chatterjee, N., Sinha, S.: Understanding the mind of a worm: Hierarchical network structure underlying nervous system function in C. elegans C. elegans . Prog. Brain Res., 168 168 , 145–153 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deem, M.W.: Mathematical adventures in biology. Physics Today, 60 60 (1), 42–47 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dorogovtsev, S.N., Mendes, J.F.F.: Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haliloglu, T., Bahar, I., Erman, B.: Gaussian dynamics of folded proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79 79 , 3090–3093 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krause, A.E., Frank, K.A., Mason, D.M., Ulanowicz, R.U., Taylor, W.W.: Compartments revealed in food-web structure. Nature, 426 426 , 282–284 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar, D., Srikanth, R., Ahlfors, H., Lahesmaa, R., Rao, K.V.S.: Capturing cell-fate decisions from the molecular signatures of a receptor-dependent signaling response. Molecular Systems Biology, 3 3 , 150 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuo, A., Gulbis, J.M., Antcliff, J.F., Rahman, T., Lowe, E.D., Zimmer, J., Cuthbertson, J., Ashcroft, F.M., Ezaki, T., Doyle, D.A.: Crystal structure of the potassium channel KirBac1.1 in the closed state. Science, 300 300 , 1922–1926 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    May, R.M.: Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (1973)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Newman, M.E.J.: Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89 89 , 208701 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newman, M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45 45 , 167–256 (2003)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pan, R.K., Sinha, S.: Modular networks emerge from multiconstraint optimization. Phys. Rev. E, 76 76 , 045103(R) (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pan, R.K., Sinha, S.: The small world of modular networks. Arxiv preprint, arXiv:0802.3671 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saramäki, J., Kaski, K.: Modelling development of epidemics with dynamic small-world networks. J. Theor. Biol., 234 234 , 413–421 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidt-Nielsen K: Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sen, P., Dasgupta, S., Chatterjee, A., Sreeram, P.A., Mukherjee, G., Manna, S.S.: Small-world properties of the Indian railway network. Phys. Rev. E, 67 67 , 036106 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sinha, S.: Complexity vs. stability in small-world networks. Physica A, 346 346 , 147–153 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sinha, S., Sinha, S.: Evidence of universality for the May-Wigner stability theorem for random networks with local dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 71 71 , 020902(R) (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sinha, S., Sinha, S.: Robust emergent activity in dynamical networks. Phys. Rev. E, 74 74 , 066117 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sinha, S., Saramäki, J., Kaski, K.: Emergence of self-sustained patterns in small-world excitable media. Phys. Rev. E, 76 76 , 015101 (R) (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Steele, A.J., Tinsley, M., Showalter, K.: Spatiotemporal dynamics of networks of excitable nodes. Chaos, 16 16 , 015110 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Strogatz, S.H.: Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410 410 , 268–276 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393 393 , 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weng, G., Bhalla, U.S., Iyengar, R.: Complexity in biological signaling systems. Science, 284 284 , 92–96 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilmers, C.C., Sinha, S., Brede, M.: Examining the effects of species richness on community stability: An assembly model approach. Oikos, 99 99 , 363–367 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilmers, C.C.: Understanding ecosystem robustness. Trends Ecol. Evoln., 22 22 , 504–506 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Institute of Mathematical SciencesCIT CampusChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations