Abstract
This chapter describes and summarizes methods for identifying the presence of clusters in a random field. The approach is based on controlling the fraction of false discoveries and considers a density estimator as the test statistic. A procedure called shaving is adopted for correcting the bias of the density estimator. This type of scanning for cluster identification does not use a window of fixed size; the role of the window size is played by the bandwidth of the kernel estimator. Clusters obtained using different bandwidths are combined in order to increase the detection power of the procedure. In this chapter we stress some more intuitive aspects of these procedures and present some applications.
Keywords and phrases
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adler, R.J. (2000). On excursion sets, tube formulas and maxima of random fields. The Annals of Applied Probability, 10, 1–74.
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289–300.
Chaudhuri, P. and Marron, J.S. (2000). Scale space view of curve estimation. The Annals of Statistics, 28, 408–428.
Genovese, C. and Wasserman, L. (2004). A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. The Annals of Statistics, 32, 1035–1061.
Glaz, J., Naus, J. and Wallenstein, S. (2001). Scan Statistics, Springer, New York.
Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. (2003). Geographic and network surveillance via scan statistics for critical area detection. Statistical Science, 18, 457–465.
Perone-Pacifico, M., Genovese, C., Verdinelli, I. and Wasserman, L. (2004). False discovery control for random fields. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 1002–1014.
Perone-Pacifico, M., Genovese, C., Verdinelli, I. and Wasserman, L. (2007). Scan clustering: a false discovery approach. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 98, 1441–
Piterbarg, V.I. (1996). Asymptotic Methods in the Theory of Gaussian Processes and Fields, American Mathematical Society. Providence, RI.
van der Laan, M., Dudoit, S. and Pollard, K. (2006). Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 3.
Worsley, K.J. (1994). Local maxima and the expected Euler characteristic of excursion sets of χ2, F and t fields. Advances in Applied Probability, 26, 13–42.
Worsley, K.J. (1995). Estimating the number of peaks in a random field using the Hadwiger characteristic of excursion sets, with applications to medical images. The Annals of Statistics, 23, 640–669.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Birkhäuser Boston, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perone-Pacifico, M., Verdinelli, I. (2009). False Discovery Control for Scan Clustering. In: Glaz, J., Pozdnyakov, V., Wallenstein, S. (eds) Scan Statistics. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4749-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4749-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-4748-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-4749-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)