Advertisement

The Deformation Philosophy, Quantization and Noncommutative Space-Time Structures

  • Daniel SternheimerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 287)

Abstract

The role of deformations in physics and mathematics, especially the theory of deformations of algebras developed by Gerstenhaber in the 1960s, led to the deformation philosophy promoted in mathematical physics by Flato since the 1970s, exemplified by deformation quantization and its manifold avatars, including quantum groups and the “dual” aspect of quantum spaces. Deforming Minkowski space-time and its symmetry to anti de Sitter has significant physical consequences that we sketch (e.g., singleton physics). We end by presenting an ongoing program in which anti de Sitter would be quantized in some regions, speculating that this could explain baryogenesis in a universe in constant expansion and that higher mathematical structures could provide a unifying framework.

Deformation theory Deformation philosophy Quantization Quantum groups Antide Sitter Composite elementary particles Quantized space-time Cosmology,Baryogenesis 

References

  1. BFFLS.
    Bayen, F., Flato, M., Fronsdal, C., Lichnerowicz, A., Sternheimer, D.: Deformation theory and quantization I: Deformation of symplectic structures; II: Physical applications. Ann. Phys. (NY) 111, 61–110; 111–151 (1978)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Be75.
    Berezin, F.A.: General concept of quantization. Comm. Math. Phys. 40(2), 153–174 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. BCSV.
    Bieliavsky, P., Claessens, L., Sternheimer, D., Voglaire, Y.: Quantized Anti de Sitter spaces and non-formal deformation quantizations of symplectic symmetric spaces. Amer. Math. Soc. Providence, R.I. 450, 1–24 (2008). arXiv:0705.4179v1[math.QA]Google Scholar
  4. BGGS.
    Bonneau, P., Gerstenhaber, M., Giaquinto, A., Sternheimer, D.: Quantum groups and deformation quantization: explicit approaches and implicit aspects. J. Math. Phys. 45(10), 3703–3741 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. BGNT.
    Bressler, P., Gorokhovsky, A., Nest, R., Tsygan, B.: Deformation quantization of gerbes. Adv. Math. 214(1), 230–266 (2007). math.QA/0512136 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. LdB29.
    de Broglie, L.: Nobel lecture, quotations from pp. 255–256 in its translation Nobel Lectures, Physics 1922–1941. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1965). http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1929/broglie-lecture.pdf
  7. CF00.
    Cattaneo, A.S., Felder, G.: A path integral approach to the Kontsevich quantization formula. Comm. Math. Phys. 212(3), 591–611 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Co94.
    Connes, A.: Noncommutative geometry. Academic, San Diego (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. CDV05.
    Connes, A., Dubois-Violette, M.: Noncommutative finite dimensional manifolds II. Moduli space and structure of noncommutative 3-spheres. math.QA/0511337 Google Scholar
  10. CM08.
    Connes, A., Marcolli M.: Noncommutative geometry, quantum fields and motives. (2008). ftp://ftp.alainconnes.org/bookwebfinal.pdf
  11. Di50.
    Dirac, P.A.M.: Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. Belfer Graduate School of Sciences Monograph Series no. 2, Yeshiva University, New York, 1964. Generalized Hamiltonian dynamics, Canad. J. Math. 2, 129–148 (1950)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Di49.
    Dirac, P.A.M.: The relation of classical to quantum mechanics. In: Proc. Second Canadian Math. Congress, Vancouver, 1949, pp. 10–31. University of Toronto Press, ON (1951)Google Scholar
  13. Di63.
    Dirac, P.A.M.: A remarkable representation of the 3+2 de Sitter group. J. Math. Phys. 4(7), 901–909 (1963)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Dt90.
    Dito, J.: Star-product approach to quantum field theory: the free scalar field. Lett. Math. Phys. 20(2), 125–134 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. DFST.
    Dito, G., Flato, M., Sternheimer, D., Takhtajan, L.: Deformation quantization and Nambu mechanics. Comm. Math. Phys. 183(1), 1–22 (1997). hep-th/9602016 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. DS02.
    Dito, G., Sternheimer, D.: Deformation quantization: genesis, developments and metamorphoses. Deformation quantization (Strasbourg, 2001), pp. 9–54, IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys. vol. 1. de Gruyter, Berlin (2002). math.QA/0201168 Google Scholar
  17. En77.
  18. Fl82.
    Flato, M.: Deformation view of physical theories. Czech. J. Phys. B32(4), 472–475 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FF88.
    Flato, M., Frønsdal, C.: Composite electrodynamics. J. Geom. Phys. 5(1), 37–61 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. FLS76.
    Flato, M., Lichnerowicz, A., Sternheimer, D.: Deformations of Poisson brackets, Dirac brackets and applications. J. Math. Phys. 17(9), 1754–1762 (1976)Google Scholar
  21. FHT93.
    Flato, M., Hadjiivanov, L.K., Todorov, I.T.: Quantum deformations of singletons and of free zero-mass fields. Found. Phys. 23(4), 571–586 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FFS99.
    Flato, M., Frønsdal, C., Sternheimer, D.: Singletons, physics in AdS universe and oscillations of composite neutrinos. Lett. Math. Phys. 48(1), 109–119 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Fr00.
    Frønsdal, C.: Singletons and neutrinos. Conférence Moshé Flato 1999 (Dijon). Lett. Math. Phys. 52(1), 51–59 (2000)Google Scholar
  24. FK07.
    Frønsdal, C.: Quantization on curves. With an appendix by Maxim Kontsevich. Lett. Math. Phys. 79(2), 109–129 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. GL78.
    Galatzer-Levy, R.L.: Qualitative change from quantitative change: mathematical catastrophe theory in relation to psychoanalysis. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc. 26, 921–935 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. GR05.
    Gelfand, I., Gelfand, S., Retakh, V., Wilson, R.L.: Factorizations of polynomials over noncommutative algebras and sufficient sets of edges in directed graphs. Lett. Math. Phys. 74(2), 153–167 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Ge64.
    Gerstenhaber, M.: On the deformation of rings and algebras. Ann. Math. (2) 79, 59–103 (1964); and (IV), Ann. Math. 99, 257–276 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. GS88.
    Gerstenhaber, M., Schack, S.D.: Algebraic cohomology and deformation theory. Deformation theory of algebras and structures and applications (Il Ciocco, 1986), pp. 11–264, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. vol. 247. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1988)Google Scholar
  29. Gr46.
    Groenewold, A.: On the principles of elementary quantum mechanics. Physica 12, 405–460 (1946)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Hi05.
    Hinich, V.: Deformations of sheaves of algebras. Adv. Math. 195(1), 102–164 (2005). math.AG/0310116 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. IW53.
    Inönü, E., Wigner, E.P.: On the contraction of groups and their representations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 39, 510–524 (1953)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. KS58.
    Kodaira, K., Spencer, D.C.: On deformations of complex analytic structures. Ann. Math. (2) 67, 328–466 (1958)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Ko99.
    Kontsevich, M.: Operads and motives in deformation quantization. Lett. Math. Phys. 48(1), 35–72 (1999). math.QA/9904055 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Ko01.
    Kontsevich, M.: Deformation quantization of algebraic varieties. EuroConférence Moshé Flato 2000, Part III (Dijon). Lett. Math. Phys. 56(3), 271–294 (2001). math.AG/0106006 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ko97.
    Kontsevich, M.: Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. Lett. Math. Phys. 66(3), 157–216 (2003). q-alg/9709040 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Kt70.
    Kostant, B.: Quantization and unitary representations. I. Prequantization. Lectures in modern analysis and applications, III, pp. 87–208. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 170, pp. 87–208. Springer, Berlin (1970)Google Scholar
  37. MMS06.
    Mathai, V., Melrose, R.B., Singer, I.M.: Fractional analytic index. J. Diff. Geom. 74(2), 265–292 (2006). math.DG/0402329,math.DG/0611819 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. MR74.
    Maurin, K., Ra̧czka, R. (eds.): Mathematical physics and physical mathematics. Proceedings of the International Symposium held in Warsaw, March 25–30, 1974. Mathematical Physics and Applied Mathematics, vol. 2. Reidel, Dordrecht (1976)Google Scholar
  39. Mo49.
    Moyal, J.E.: Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 45, 99–124 (1949)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Na98.
    Nadaud, F.: Generalized deformations, Koszul resolutions, Moyal products. Rev. Math. Phys. 10(5), 685–704 (1998), Thèse, Dijon (janvier 2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. NT95.
    Nest, R., Tsygan, B.: Algebraic index theorem. Comm. Math. Phys. 172(2), 223–262 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Pa07.
    Palamodov, V.P.: Associative deformations of complex analytic spaces. Lett. Math. Phys. 82(2–3), 191–217 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Ri54.
    Riemann, B.: Ueber die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen. 1854 Habilitationsschrift, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen 13 (1868); translated by William Kingdon Clifford, On the Hypotheses which lie at the Bases of Geometry. Nature 8, 14–17 (1873) Transcribed and edited in 1998–2000 by David R. Wilkins, see http://www.emis.de/classics/Riemann/
  44. Se51.
    Segal, I.E.: A class of operator algebras which are determined by groups. Duke Math. J. 18, 221–265 (1951)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. So70.
    Souriau, J.-M.: Structure of dynamical systems. A symplectic view of physics. Translated from the 1970 French edition by C.H. Cushman-de Vries. Translation edited and with a preface by R.H. Cushman and G.M. Tuynman. Progress in Mathematics vol. 149. Birkhäuser, Boston (1997)Google Scholar
  46. St06.
    Sternheimer, D.: Some reflections on mathematicians’ views of quantization. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (POMI) 331, 199–220 (2006); edited in J. Math. Sci. (NY) 141(4), 1494–1505 (2007)Google Scholar
  47. St07.
    Sternheimer, D.: The geometry of space-time and its deformations from a physical perspective. In: From Geometry to Quantum Mechanics. Progr. Math. vol. 252, pp. 287–301. Birkhäuser, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  48. VdB07.
    Van den Bergh, M.: On global deformation quantization in the algebraic case, J. Algebra 315(1), 326–395 (2007). math.AG/0603200 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. We28.
    Weyl, H.: The theory of groups and quantum mechanics. Dutton/Dover, New York, 1931, translated from the second edition (1931) of Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, Hirzel, Leipzig (1928)Google Scholar
  50. Wi32.
    Wigner, E.P.: Quantum corrections for thermodynamic equilibrium. Phys. Rev. 40, 749–759 (1932)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Wo79.
    Woronowicz, S.L.: Pseudospaces, pseudogroups and Pontriagin duality. Mathematical problems in theoretical physics. (Proc. Internat. Conf. Math. Phys., Lausanne, 1979). Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 116, pp. 407–412. Springer, Berlin (1980)Google Scholar
  52. Ye03.
    Yekutieli, A.: Deformation quantization in algebraic geometry. Adv. Math. 198(1), 383–432 (2005). math.AG/0310399,math.AG/07081654 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations