Biology Thrives Near a Movable Cusp of Insolubility


Biology thrives near a movable cusp of insolubility, yet excursions too far, either direction, into the realms of insolubility or solubility spell disease and death.


Prion Protein Hydrophobic Domain Apical Domain Oxygen Binding Polar Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D.W. Urry, T. Hugel, M. Seitz, H. Gaub, L. Sheiba, J. Dea, J. Xu, and T. Parker, “Elastin: A Representative Ideal Protein Elastomer”. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 357, 169–184. 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.W. Urry and T.M. Parker, “Mechanics of Elastin: Molecular Mechanism of Biological Elasticity and its Relevance to Contraction”. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil., Spec. Issue, 23, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.W. Urry, “Physical Chemistry of Biological Free Energy Transduction as Demonstrated by Elastic Protein-based Polymers”. J. Phys. Chem. B, 101, 11007–11028, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.W. Urry, “Elastic Biomolecular Machines: Synthetic Chains of Amino Acids, Patterned After Those in Connective Tissue, can Transform Heat and Chemical Energy into Motion”. Sci. Am., January 1995, 64–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Two curiously complementary and impeding truisms face any newly proposed concept or outlook in science. They may be demonstrated by two quotations. The first, attributed to Maurice Maeterlinck, indicates the struggle of those who would make new proposals, “At every crossway on the road that leads to the future, tradition, has placed against each of us, 10,000 men to guard the past.” The second suggests why it is so easy, even for those without a direct personal stake, to hold with tradition, “Keep in mind that new ideas are commonplace, and almost always wrong” (E.O. Wilson, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, Alfred E. Knopf, New York, 1998). Accordingly, to stand against a new idea is to be almost always right, with neither intellectual effort nor actual understanding required. Those who might practice default to pretense could seldom find a better opportunity.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 1993, p. 557.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 27th Edition. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1985, p. 1468.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged. MerriamWebster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 1993, p. 432.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    C.S. Roy, “The Elastic Properties of the Arterial Wall”. J. Physiol., 3, 125–159, 1880.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    L.B. Sandberg, J.G. Leslie, C.T. Leach, V. L. Alvarez, A.R. Torres, and D.W. Smith, “Elastin Covalent Structure as Determined by Solid Phase Amino Acid Sequencing”. Pathol. Biol., 33, 266–74, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    T. Weis-Fogh and S.O. Andersen, “New Molecular Model for the Long-range Elasticity of Elastin”. Nature, 227, 718–721, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.
    C.A. Hoeve and P.J. Flory, “The Elastic Properties of Elastin”. Biopolymers, 13, 677–686, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 14.
    A. V. Hill, “The Elastic Properties of Elastin in Physiological Tissues”. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 139, 464–497, 1952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 15.
    D.K. Hill, “The Effect of Temperature in the Range 0–35 Degrees C on the Resting Tension of Frog’s Muscle”. J. Physiol., 208, 725–739, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 16.
    K.W. Ranatunga, “Thermal Stress and Caindependent Contractile Activation in Mammalian Skeletal Muscle Fibers at High Temperatures”. Biophys. J., 66, 1531–1541, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    D.W. Urry, D.C. Gowda, S.-Q. Peng, and T.M. Parker., “Non-linear Hydrophobic-induced pKa Shifts: Implications for Efficiency of Conversion to Chemical Energy”. Chem. Phys. Lett., 239, 67–74, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 18.
    A. V. Hill, “The Possible Effect of the Aggregation of Hemoglobin on its Dissociation Curves”. Proceedings of the Physiological Society, J. Physiol., 40, iv–vii, 1910, and A.V. Hill. J. Biochem., 7, 471–480, 1913.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    N.B. Butwell, R. Ramasamy, I. Lazar, A.D. Sherry, and C.R. Malloy, “Effect of Lidocaine on Contracture, Intracellular Sodium, and pH in Ischemic Rat Hearts”. Am. J. Physiol., 264(6Pt2), H1884–H1889, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 20.
    K.I. Furakawa, J. Komaba, H. Sakai, and Y. Ohizumi, “The Mechanism of Acidic pH-Induced Contraction in Aortae from SHR and WKY Rats Enhanced by Increasing Blood Pressure”. Br. J. Pharmacol., 118, 485–492, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    D.W. Urry and S.-Q. Peng, “Non-linear Mechanical Force-induced pKa Shifts: Implications for Efficiency of Conversion to Chemical Energy”. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 8478–8479, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 22.
    J.W. Pringle, “The Croonian Lecture, 1977. Stretch Activation of Muscle: Function and Mechanism”. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci., 201(1143), 107–130, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    N. Thomas and R.A. Thornhill, “Stretch Activation and Nonlinear Elasticity of Muscle Cross-bridges”. Biophys. J., 70(6):2807–2818, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 24.
    M. Suzuki, J. Shigematsu, Y. Fukunishi, Y. Harada, and T. Yanagida, T. Komada, “Coupling of Protein Surface Hydrophobicity Change to ATP Hydrolysis by Myosin Motor Domain”. Biophys. J., 72, 18–23, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 25.
    M.F. Perutz, “Mechanisms of Cooperativity and Allosteric Regulation in Proteins”. Q. Rev. Biophys., 22, 139–236, 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 26.
    D. Bulone, M.B. Palma-Vittorelli, and M.U. Palma, “Enthalpic and Entropic Contributions of Water Molecules to Functional T→R Transition of Human Hemoglobin in Solution”. Int. J. Q. Chem., 42, 1427–1437, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 27.
    D. Bulone, P.L. San Biagio, M. B. Palma-Vittorelli, and M.U. Palma, “On the Role of Water in Hemoglobin Function and Stability, Response”. Science, 259, 1335–1336, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 28.
    M.F. Colombo, D.C. Rau, and V.A. Parsegian, “Protein Solution in Allosteric Regulation: A Water Effect on Hemoglobin.” Science, 256, 655–659, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 29.
    C. Bohr, K.A. Hasselbalch, and A. Krogh, “Uber einem in biologischen Beziehung wichtigen Einfluss, den die Kohlensaurespannung des Blutes auf dessen Sauerstoffbinding übt.” Skand. Arch. Physiol., 16, 401–412, 1904.Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    J.A.V. Butler, “The Energy and Entropy of Hydration of Organic Compounds.” Trans. Faraday Soc., 33, 229–238, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 32.
    H.M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T.N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I.N. Shindyalov, and P.E. Bourne, “The Protein Data Bank.” Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235–242, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 33.
    E. Martz, “FrontDoor to Protein Explorer 1.982 Beta.” Copyright © 2002. Website:
  32. 34.
    D.W. Urry and J.W. Pettegrew, “Model Systems for Interacting Heme Moieties. II. The Ferriheme Octapeptide of Cytochrome.” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 5276–5283, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 35.
    J.R.H. Tame and B. Vallone, “The Structures of Deoxy Human Haemoglobin and the Mutant Tyrα42 His at 120K.” Acta Crystal. D, 56, 805–811, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 36.
    M. Paoli, R. Liddington, J. Tame, A. Wilkinson, and G. Dodson, “Crystal Structure of T State Haemoglobin with Oxygen Bound at all Four Haems.” J. Mol. Biol., 256, 775–792, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 38.
    J. Vojtechovsky, J. Berendzen, K. Chu, L. Schlichting, and R.M. Sweet, “Implications for the Mechanism of Ligand Discrimination and Identification of Substrates Derived from Crystal Structures of Myoglobin-Ligand Complexes at Atomic Resolution.” Protein Data Bank, Structure Files, 1A6N and 1A6M.Google Scholar
  36. 39.
    A. Brzowowski, Z. Derewenda, E. Dodson, G. Dodson, M.J. Grabowowski, R. Liddington, T. Skarzynski, and D. Valley, “Bonding of Molecular Oxygen to T State Human Haemoglobin.” Nature, 307, 74–76, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 40.
    R.C. Liddington, Z. Derewenda, G. Dodson, and D. Harris, “Structure of the Liganded T State of Haemoglobin Identifies the Origins of Cooperative Oxygen Binding.” Nature, 331, 725–728, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 41.
    R.C. Liddington, Z. Derewenda, E. Dodson, R. Hubbard, and G. Dodson, “High resolution crystal structures and comparisons of T state deoxy and two liganded T state hemoglobins: T (αoxy) Haemoglobin and T (met) Haemoglobin.” J. Mol. Biol., 228, 551–579, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 42.
    C. Rivetti, A. Mozarelli, G.L. Rossi, E.R. Henry, and W.A. Eaton, “Oxygen Binding by Single Crystals of Haemoglobin.” Biochemistry, 32, 2888–2906, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 43.
    D. Voet and J.G. Voet, Biochemistry, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995, p. 226.Google Scholar
  41. 44.
    See, for example, “Sickle Cell Anemia.” Encyclopedia Britannica, 2002.Google Scholar
  42. 45.
    W.A. Eaton and J. Hofrichter, “Sickle Cell Hemoglobin Polymerization.” Adv. Prot. Chem., 40, 63–279, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 46.
    M. Manno, A. Emanuele, V. Martorana, P.L. San Biagio, D. Bulone, M.B. Palma-Vitorelli, D.T. McPherson, J. Xu, T.M. Parker, and D.W. Urry, “Interaction of Processes on Different Time Scales in a Bioelastomer Capable of Performing Energy Conversion.” Biopolymers, 59, 51–64, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 47.
    F. Sciortino, K.U. Prasad, D.W. Urry, and M.U. Palma, “Self-assembly of Bioelastomeric Structures From Solutions: Mean Field Critical Behavior and Flory-Huggins Free-energy of Interaction.” Biopolymers, 33, 743–752, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 48.
    P.L. San Biagio and M.U. Palma, “Spinodal Lines and Flory-Huggins Free-energies for Solutions of Human Hemoglobins HbS and HbA.” Biophys. J., 60, 508–512, 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 49.
    P.L. San Biagio and M.U. Palma, “Solvent-induced Forces and Fluctuations: A Novel Comparison of Human Hemoglobin S and A” Comments Theor. Biol., 2, 453–470, 1992.Google Scholar
  47. 50.
    D.W. Chung, J.E. Harris, and E. Harris, “Nucleotide Sequences of the Three Genes Encoding for Human Fibrinogen.” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 281, 39–48, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 51.
    Z. Yang, J.M. Kollman, L. Pandi, and R.F. Doolittle, “Crystal Structure of Native Chicken Fibrinogen at 2.7 Å Resolution.” Biochemistry, 40, 12515–12520, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 52.
    D.W. Urry, T.L. Trapane, and K.U. Prasad, “Phase-structure Transitions of the Elastin Polypentapeptide-water system Within the Framework of Composition-Temperature Studies.” Biopolymers, 24, 2345–2356, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 53.
    M.W. Mosesson, K.R. Siebenlist, and D.A. Meh, “The Structure and Biological Features of Fibrinogen and Fibrin.” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 936, 11–30, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 54.
    G. Spraggon, S.J. Everse, and R.S. Doolittle, “Crystal Structures of Fragment D from Human Fibrinogen and its Crosslinked Counterpart from Fibrin.” Nature, 389, 455–462, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 55.
    S.J. Everse, G. Spraggon, L. Veerapandian, M. Riley, and R.F. Doolittle, “Crystal Structure of Fragment Double D from Human Fibrin with Two Different Bound Ligands.” Biochemistry, 37, 8637–8642, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 56.
    L.C. Serpell, M. Sunde, and C.C.F. Blake, “The molecular basis of amyloidosis.” Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 53, 871–887, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 58.
    R.B. Wickner, K.L. Taylor, H.K. Edskes, M.-L. Maddelein, H. Moriyama, and B.T. Roberts, “Prions in Saccharomyces and Podospora spp.: Protein-based Inheritance.” Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Revs., 63, 844–861, 1999.Google Scholar
  55. 59.
    J.S. Griffiths, “Self-replication and Scrapie.” Nature, 215, 1043–1044, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 60.
    S.B. Prusiner, “Novel Proteinaceous Particles Cause Scrapie.” Science, 216, 136–144, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 61.
    S.B. Prusiner, “Scrapie Prions.” Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 43, 345–374, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 63.
    S.B. Prusiner, D.C. Gajdusek, and M.P. Alpers, “Kuru with Incubation Periods Exceeding Two Decades.” Ann. Neurol., 12, 1–9, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 65.
    P. Brown, P.P. Liberski, A. Wolff, and D.C. Gajdusek, “Resistance to Steam Autoclaving After Formaldehyde Fixation and Limited Survival After Ashing at 360 Degrees C: Practical and Theoretical Limitations.” J. Infect. Dis., 161, 467–472, 1990. “Formaldehyde Fixation and Limited Survival After Ashing at 360 Degrees C: Practical and Theoretical Limitations.” J. Infect. Dis., 161, 467–472, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 66.
    D.M. Taylor, H. Fraser, I. McConnell, D.A. Brown, K.A. Lanza, and G.R. Smith, “Decontamination Studies with the Agents of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy and Scrapie.” Arch. Virol., 139, 313–326, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 68.
    J. Collinge, K.C. Sidle, J. Meads, J. Ironside, and A.F. Hill, “Molecular Analysis of Prion Strain Variation and the Aetiology of ‘New Variant’ CJD.” Nature, 383, 685–690, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 69.
    Health Canada—Canada Comminicable Disease Report, Vol. 22–17. Website:
  63. 70.
  64. 71.
    D.W. Urry and C.-H. Luan, “Proteins: Structure, Folding and Function.” In Bioelectrochemistry: Principles and Practice, G Lenaz, Ed., Birkhäuser Verlag AG, Basel, Switzerland, 1995, pp. 105–182.Google Scholar
  65. 73.
    H. Inouye, J. Bond, M.A. Baldwin, H.L. Ball, S.B. Prusiner, and D.A. Kirschner, “Structural Changes in a Hydrophobic Domain of the Prion Protein Induced by Hydration and by Ala →Val and Pro →Leu Substitutions.” J. Mol. Biol., 300, 1283–1296, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 75.
    D.D. Laws, H-M.L. Bitter, K. Liu, H.L. Ball, K. Kaneko, H. Wille, F.E. Cohen, S.B. Prusiner, A. Pines, and D.E. Wemmer, “Solid-state NMR Studies of the Secondary Structure of a Mutant Prion Protein Fragment of 55 Residues that Induces Neurodegeneration” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98, 11686–11690, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 76.
    S.B. Prusiner, “Molecular Biology of Prion Diseases”. Science, 252, 1515–1522, 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 77.
    W. Swietnicki, R. Petersen, P. Gambetti, and W.K. Surewicz, “pH Dependent Stability and Conformation at the Recombinant Human Prion Protein PrP (90–231).” J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27517–27520, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 78.
    S. Hornemann and R. Glockshuber, “A Scrapielike Unfolding Intermediate at the Prion Protein Domain PrP (121–231). Induced by Acidic pH.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95, 6010–6014, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 79.
    H. Wille, M.D. Michelitsch, V. Guénebaut, S. Supattapone, A. Serban, F.E. Cohen, D.A. Agard, and S.B. Prusiner, “Structural Studies of the Scrapie Prion Protein by Electron Crystallography.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 3563–3568, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 80.
    D.R. Booth, M. Sunde, V. Bellotti, C.V. Robinson, W.L. Hutchinson, P.E. Frazer, P.N. Hawkins, C.M. Dobson, S.E. Radford, C.C.F. Blake, and M.B. Pepys, “Instability, Unfolding and Aggregation of Human Lysozyme Variants Underlying Amyloid Fibrillogenesis” Nature, 385, 787–793, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 81.
    Z. Xu and P.B. Sigler, “GroEL/GroES: Structure and Function of a Two-stroke Folding Machine” J. Struct. Biol., 124, 129–141, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 82.
    Z. Xu, A.L. Horwich, and P.B. Sigler, “The Crystal Structure of Asymmetric GroEL-GroEs-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex.” Nature, 388, 741–750, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 83.
    C.B. Anfinsen, “Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains.” Science, 181, 223–230, 1973; The, Anfinsen principle is that the sequence of a protein dictates the full three-dimensional structure that it would form, that is, sequence dictates protein folding and assembly. The need for molecular chaperones suggests that the correctly folded protein, the lowest energy structure, is not always the result and that the problem arises out of improper hydrophobic associations. Interestingly, the need for molecular chaperones is greatest when temperature is elevated. They were first identified as heat shock proteins, which are just the conditions where metastable hydrophobic associations would occur. The rise in temperature from that of the cusp of insolubility to the insoluble hydrophobically associated state occurred without opportunity for the protein to sort out the lowest energy, hydrophobically associated state. Thus, biology employs a polar cage that ensures hydrophobic dissociation and then systematically decreases polarity of the cage by hydrolysis of ATP with phosphate release to allow for correct hydrophobic re-association.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 84.
  76. 85.
    J. Wang and D.C. Boisvert, “Structural Basis for GroEL-assisted Protein Folding from the Crystal Structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0 Å Resolution.” J. Mol. Biol., 327, 843–855, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 86.
    K. Braig, Z. Otwinowski, R. Hedge, D.C. Boisvert, A. Joachimiak, A.L. Horwich, and P.B. Sigler, “The Crystal Structure of Bacterial Chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å.” Nature, 371, 578–586, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 87.
    K. Braig, P. Adams, and A.T. Brunger, “Conformational Variability in the Refined Structure of the Chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å Resolution.” Nature Struct. Biol., 2, 1083–1094, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 90.
    R. Lovat and J.C. Preiser, “Antioxidant Therapy in Intensive Care.” Curr. Opin. Crit. Care, 9, 266–270, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 91.
    D.W. Urry, H. Sugano, K.U. Prasad, M.M. Long, and R.S. Bhatnagar, “Prolyl Hydroxylation of the Polypentapeptide Model, of Elastin Impairs Fiber Formation.” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 90, 194–198, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 92.
    R.S. Bhatnagar, R.S. Rapaka, and D.W. Urry, “Interaction of Polypeptide Models of Elastin with Prolyl Hydroxylase.” FEBS Lett., 95, 61–64, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 93.
    L.M. Barone, B. Faris, S.D. Chipman, P. Toselli, B.W. Oakes, and C. Franzblau, “Alteration of the Extracellular Matrix of Smooth Muscle Cells by Ascorbate Treatment.” Biochchim. Biophys. Acta, 840, 245–254, 1985.Google Scholar
  83. 94.
    E.R. Peacock, Jr., Wound Repair, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1984, pp. 56–101.Google Scholar
  84. 95.
    D.W. Urry, “Entropic Elastic Processes in Protein Mechanism. II. Simple (Passive) and Coupled (Active) Development of Elastic Forces.” J. Protein Chem., 7, 81–114, 1988; especially Figure 12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 96.
    D.W. Urry, R.S. Bhatnagar, H. Sugano, K.U. Prasad, and R.S. Rapaka, “A Molecular Basis for Defective Elastic Tissue in Environmentally Induced Lung Disease.” In Molecular Basis of Environmental Toxicity, R.S. Bhatnagar, Ed., Ann Arbor Scientific Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 515–530, 1980.Google Scholar
  86. 97.
    J.G. Clark, C. Kuhn, and R.P. Meacham “Lung Connective Tissue.” Int. Rev. Connect. Tissue Res., 10, 249–331, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 98.
    P.J. Stone, “The Elastase-Antielastase Hypothesis of the Pathogenesis of Emphysema.” Clin. Chest Med., 4, 405–412, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 99.
    G.L. Snider, “Two Decades of Research in the Pathogenesis of Emphysema.” Schweiz Med. Wochenschr., 114, 898–906, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 100.
    A. Janoff, “Elastases and Emphysema. Current Assessment of the Protease-Antiprotease Hypothesis.” Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., 132, 417–433, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 101.
    C. Kuhn, S.-Y. Yu M. Chraplyvy, H.E. Linder, and R.M. Senior, “The Induction of Emphysema with Elastase. II. Changes in Connective Tissue.” Lab. Invest., 34, 372–380, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 102.
    M. Osman, S. Keller, Y. Hosannah, J.O. Cantor, G.M. Turino, and I. Mandl, “Impairment of Elastin Resynthesis in the Lungs of Hampsters with Experimental Emphysema Induced by Sequential Administration of Elastase and Trypsin.” 105, 254–258, 1985.Google Scholar
  92. 103.
    D. Voet and J.G. Voet, Biochemistry, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  93. 104.
    J.G. White, “Ultrastructural Features of Erythrocyte and Hemoglobin Sickling.” Arch. Intern. Med., 133, 545–562, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 105.
    G.W. Dykes, R.H. Crepeau, and S.J. Edelstein, “Three-dimensional Reconstruction of 14-Filament Fibers of Hemoglobin S.” J. Mol. Biol., 130, 451–472, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 106.
    J.D. Harper and P.T. Lansbury, Jr., “Models of Amyloid Seeding in Alzheimer’s Disease and Scrapie: Mechanistic Truths and Physiological Consequences of the Time-dependent Solubility of Amyloid Proteins.” Annu. Rev. Biochem., 66, 385–407, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Personalised recommendations