Skip to main content

Th1–Th2 Regulation and Allergy: Bifurcation Analysis of the Non-Autonomous System

  • Chapter
Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Volume II

Summary

A previously proposed mathematical model based on a simplified scheme of Th1– Th2 regulation mediated by the cytokine network which describes the population dynamics of allergen-specific naive T cells, Th1 and Th2 cells, autocrine and cross-suppressive cytokines, and allergen is more closely investigated. The model provides a theoretical explanation of the switch from a Th2-dominated response to a Th1-dominated response to allergen in allergic individuals as a result of a hyposensitization therapy. We focus here on the bifurcation analysis of the nonautonomous dynamical system driven by periodic allergen injections. The stability of the fixed points of a stroboscopic map is investigated. The set of unstable fixed points forms the dynamical separatrix between the regions of Th2-dominated response and Th1-dominated response which is crossed during a successful therapy. The maintenance phase of the therapy holds the system near the stable fixed point of the stroboscobic map.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Romagnani, S.: Human Th1 and Th2: doubt no more. Immunology Today, 12, 256–257 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Romagnani, S. (ed): Th1 and Th2 cells in health and disease. Chemical Immunology, 63, Karger, Basel (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heppt, W., Reuz, H., Roecken, M. (eds): Allergologie. Springer, Berlin (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blaser, K., Carballido, J., Faith, A., Crameri, R., Akdis, C.: Determinants and mechanisms of human immune responses to bee venom phospholipase A2. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 117, 1–10 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McHugh, S.M., Deighton, J., Stewart, A.G., Lachmann, P.J., Ewan, P.W.: Bee venom immunotherapy induces a shift in cytokine response from a Th2 to a Th1 dominant pattern: comparison of rush and conventional immunotherapy. Clin. Exp. Allergy, 25, 828–838 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuerwegh, A.J., Cluck, L.S.D., Bridts, C.H., Stevens, W.J.: Wasp venom immunotherapy induces a shift from IL-4-producing towards interferon-gamma-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Clin. Exp. Allergy, 31, 740–746 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tari, M.G., Mancino, M., Madonna, F., Buzzoni, L., Parmiani, S.: Immunologic evaluation of 24 month course of sublingual immunotherapy. Allergol. Immonopathol. (Madr), 22, 209–216, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Noon, L., Cantab, B.C.: Prophylactic inoculation against hay fever. Lancet 1, 1572–1574 (1911).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Behn, U., Dambeck, H., Metzner, G.: Modeling Th1–Th2 regulation, allergy, and hyposensitization. In: Bagnoli, F., Ruffo, S. (eds) Dynamical Modeling in Biotechnologies (Lectures presented at the EU Advanced Workshop, Torino, May 27–June 9, 1996). World Scientific, Singapore, 227–244 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richter, J., Metzner, G., Behn, U.: Venom immunotherapy: A mathematical model. J. Theor. Med., 4, 119–132 (2002).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Richter, J., Behn, U., Metzner, G.: Modelling of Th1–Th2 regulation, allergy and venom immunotherapy. In: Marone, G. (ed) Clinical Immunology and Allergy in Medicine, Proc. 21st EAACI Congress 2002, Naples. JGC Editions, Naples, 257–262 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ruedl, C., Bachmann, M.F., Kopf, M.: The antigen dose determines T helper subset development by regulation of CD40 ligand. Eur. J. Immunol., 30, 2056–2064 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg, A., Confino-Cohen, R.: Maintenance venom immunotherapy administered at 3-month intervals is both safe and efficacious. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 107, 902–906 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Langa, J.A., Robinson, J.C., Suárez, A.: Stability, instability, and bifurcation phenomena in non-autonomous differential equations. Nonlinearity, 15, 887–903 (2002).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Akdis, M., Blaser, K., Akdis, C.A.: TReg cells and allergy: a question of balance and antigen specifity. Nature Rev. Immunol., 3 Viewpoint (online only), doi:10.1038/nri1047 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ngoc, L.P., Gold, D.R., Tzianabos, A.O., Weiss, S.T., Celedón, J.C.: Cytokines, allergy, and asthma. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 5, 161–166 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hantusch, B., et al.: Internal images: Human anti-idiotypic Fab antibodies mimic the IgE epitopes of grass pollen allergen Phl p 5a. Mol. Immunol., 43, 2180–2187 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vogel, R., Behn, U. (2008). Th1–Th2 Regulation and Allergy: Bifurcation Analysis of the Non-Autonomous System. In: Deutsch, A., et al. Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems, Volume II. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4556-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics