Advertisement

Methods and tools of mathematical kinetic theory towards modelling complex biological systems

  • Nicola Bellomo
  • Abdelghani Bellouquid
  • Marcello Delitala
Part of the Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology book series (MSSET)

Abstract

Methods of mathematical kinetic theory have been recently developed to describe the collective behavior of large populations of interacting individuals such that their microscopic state is identified not only by a mechanical variable (typically position and velocity), but also by a biological state (or sociobiological state) related to their organized, somehow intelligent, behavior. The interest in this type of mathematical approach is documented in the collection of surveys edited in [1], in the review papers [2], [3], and in the book [4].

Keywords

Immune Cell Kinetic Theory Abnormal Cell Complex Biological System Active Immune Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    N. Bellomo and M. Pulvirenti, Eds., Modeling in Applied Sciences: A Kinetic Theory Approach, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2000.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    N. Bellomo, E. De Angelis, and L. Preziosi, Multiscale modelling and mathematical problems related to tumor evolution and medical therapy, J. Theor. Medicine, 5, 111–136, (2003).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    N. Bellomo, A. Bellouquid, and M. Delitala, Mathematical topics in the modelling complex multicellular systems and tumor immune cells competition, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 14, 1683–1733, (2004).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Bellouquid and M. Delitala, Modelling Complex Systems in Biology—A Kinetic Theory Approach, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2006)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    L. Arlotti, N. Bellomo, and E. De Angelis, Generalized kinetic (Boltzmann) models: Mathematical structures and applications, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 12, 579–604, (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Cercignani, R. Illner, and M. Pulvirenti, Theory and Application of the Boltzmann Equation, Springer, Heidelberg, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Schweitzer, Brownian Agents and Active Particles, Springer, Berlin, 2003.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    N. Bellomo and G. Forni, Dynamics of tumor interaction with the host immune system, Math. Comp. Mod., 20, 107–122, (1994).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. Arlotti, M. Lachowicz, and A. Gamba, A kinetic model of tumor/immune system cellular interactions, J. Theor. Medicine, 4, 39–50, (2002).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    E. De Angelis and P.E. Jabin, Qualitative analysis of a mean field model of tumor-immune system competition, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 13, 187–206, (2003).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Kolev, Mathematical modeling of the competition between acquired immunity and cancer, Appl. Math. Comp. Science, 13, 289–297, (2003).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Bellouquid and M. Delitala, Kinetic (cellular) models of cell progression and competition with the immune system, Z. Agnew. Math. Phys., 55, 295–317, (2004).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    L. Derbel, Analysis of a new model for tumor-immune system competition including long time scale effects, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 14, 1657–1682,(2004).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Willander, E. Mamontov, and Z. Chiragwandi, Modelling living fluids with the subdivision into the components in terms of probability distributions, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 14, 1495–1521, (2004).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Kolev, A mathematical model of cellular immune response to leukemia, Math. Comp. Mod., 41, 1071–1082, (2005).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Kolev, E. Kozlowska, and M. Lachowicz, Mathematical model of tumor invasion along linear or tubular structures, Math. Comp. Mod., 41, 1083–1096, (2005).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Bellouquid and M. Delitala, Mathematical methods and tools of kinetic theory towards modelling of complex biological systems, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 15, (2005), 1619–1638.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    M.L. Bertotti and M. Delitala, From discrete kinetic and stochastic game theory to modeling complex systems in applied sciences, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 14, 1061–1084, (2004).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. Chauviere and I. Brazzoli, On the discrete kinetic theory for active particles—Mathematical tools, Math. Comp. Mod., 43, 933–944, (2006).CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    L. Greller, F. Tobin, and G. Poste, Tumor heterogeneity and progression: conceptual foundation for modeling, Invasion and Metastasis, 16, 177–208, (1996).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    B. Perthame, Mathematical tools for kinetic equations, Bull. Am. Math. Society, 41, 205–244, (2004).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    C. Villani, Recent advances in the theory and applications of mass transport, Contemp. Math. Amer. Math. Soc., 353, 95–109, (2004).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    J. Adam and N. Bellomo, Eds., A Survey of Models on Tumor Immune Systems Dynamics, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1997.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    L. Preziosi, Modeling Cancer Growth, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2003.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Lachowicz, Micro and meso scales of description corresponding to a model of tissue invasion by solid tumours, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 15, 1667–1684, (2005).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    M.A.J. Chaplain and G. Lolas, Spatio-temporal heterogeneity arising in a mathematical model of cancer invasion of tissue, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 15, 1685–1778, (2005).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    N. Bellomo and A. Bellouquid, From a class of kinetic models to macroscopic equations for multicellular systems in biology, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. B, 4, 59–80, (2004).MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    N. Bellomo and A. Bellouquid, On the mathematical kinetic theory of active particles with discrete states—the derivation of macroscopic equations, Math. Comp. Mod., (2006).Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    T. Hillen and H. Othmer, The diffusion limit of transport equations derived from velocity jump processes, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 61, (2000), 751–775.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Stevens, The derivation of chemotaxis equations as limit dynamics of moderately interacting stochastic many-particles systems, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 61, 183–212, (2000).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    H.L. Hartwell, J.J. Hopfield, S. Leibner, and A.W. Murray, From molecular to modular cell biology, Nature, 402, c47–c52, (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    R. Reed, Why is mathematical biology so hard?, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 51, 338–342, (2004).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    R.M. May, Uses and abuses of mathematics in biology, Science, 303, 790–793, (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    C.R. Woese, A new biology for a new century, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 68, 173–186, (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Bellomo
    • 1
  • Abdelghani Bellouquid
    • 2
  • Marcello Delitala
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsPolitecnico, TorinoItaly
  2. 2.Ecole Nationale des Sciences AppliquéesUniversity Cadi AyyadSafiMaroc

Personalised recommendations