Design Imitation in the Fashion Industry

  • Steffen JØrgensen
  • Andrea Di Liddo
Part of the Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games book series (AISDG, volume 9)


This chapter deals with the imitation of fashion products, an issue that attracts considerable interest in practice. Copying of fashion originals is a major concern of designers and, in particular, their financial backers. Fashion firms are having a hard time fighting imitations, but legal sanctions are not easily implemented in this industry. We study an alternative strategy that has been used by designers. Instead of fighting the imitators in the courtroom, designers fight them in the market. The designer markets her products in two separate markets. Typically, there is a “high-class” market in which the products are sold in exclusive stores at high prices. Customers in this market seek exclusivity and their utility diminishes when they see an increasing number of copies around. Their perception of the brand tends to dilute which poses a serious threat to a fashion company. The second market is a “middle-class” market in which there are many more buyers, and the fashion firm competes directly with the imitators in this market. This market can be used to practice price discrimination, to sell off leftover inventories, and to get a spin-off from the design. This chapter models the decision problems of the fashion firm and the imitators as a two-period game in which firms make pricing decisions and decisions on when to introduce their products in the markets. In addition, the fashion firm decides how much effort to spend to increase its brand image in the two markets.


Brand Image Fashion Industry Unit Production Cost Advertising Effort Sales Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Caulkins, J., R.F. Hartl, P.M. Kort and G. Feichtinger, Explaining Fashion Cycles: Chasing Innovators by Imitators. Working Paper. Carnegie Mellon University/University of Vienna/Tilburg University/Vienna University of Technology, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole, Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    JØrgensen, S., S. P. Sigue and G. Zaccour, Stackelberg Leadership in a Marketing Channel, International Game Theory Review 3, 2001, 13–26.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Leibenstein, H., Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand, Quarterly Journal of Economics 64, 1950, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Magdo, C., Protecting Works of Fashion from Design Piracy, Working Paper, LEDA, Harvard Business School, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Rags and Riches, The Economist, March 6, 2004, 3–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steffen JØrgensen
    • 1
  • Andrea Di Liddo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly

Personalised recommendations