Economic Growth and Process Spillovers with Step-by-Step Innovation

  • Shravan Luckraz
Part of the Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games book series (AISDG, volume 9)


This paper extends previous research on the effects of process imitation on economic growth by accounting for stochastic intra-industry spillovers. We employ a non-Schumpeterian growth model to determine the impact of such spillovers on investment in industries where firms are either neck-and-neck or unleveled. Our central finding is that, in an economy where the representative industry is a duopoly, research and development (RD) spillovers positively affect economic growth. While other non-Schumpeterian models assume that the imitation rate of laggard firms is unaffected by the RD effort of the leader firm, we consider the case where the latter’s RD activity generates some positive externality on its rivals’ research. In this construct, the duopolists in each industry play a two-stage game. In the first stage, they invest in RD which can reduce their costs of production only if they successfully innovate and they compete with each other by using Markovian strategies. In the second stage, they compete in the product market. At any point in time, an industry can be either in the neck-and-neck state or in an unleveled state where the leader is n steps ahead of the follower. At the steady state, the inflow of firms to an industry must be equal to the outflow. By determining the steady state investment levels of each industry, we demonstrate a positive monotonic relationship between the spillover rate and economic growth.


Reverse Engineering Strategic Interaction Productivity Lead Markovian Strategy Subgame Perfection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    P. Aghion, C. Harris, P. Howitt, J. Vickers, Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step by Step Innovation. European Economic Review 41 (1997), 771–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. Aghion, C. Harris, P. Howitt, J. Vickers, Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step by Step Innovation. Review of Economic Studies 68 (2001), 467–492.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. D’Aspremont, R. Ferreira, L. Varet, Strategic RD Investment, Competition Toughness and Growth. Unpublished (2002).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    C. D’Aspremont, A. Jacquemin, Cooperative and Non cooperative RD in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review 78 (1988), 1133–1137.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Blundell, R. Griffith, J. Reenen, Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation. Economic Journal 105 (1995), 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    W. Cohen, D. Levinthal, Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of RD. Economic Journal 99 (1989), 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. Dockner, V. N. Long, S. Gerhard, S. Jorgensen, Differential Games in Economics and Management Science. Cambridge University Press (2000).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. J. Glass, Imitation as a stepping stone to Innovation. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Ohio State University (2000).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Z. Griliches, Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1979), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    G Grossman, H. Helpman, Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. Review of Economic Studies 58 (1991), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    G Grossman, H. Helpman, Quality Ladders and Product Cycles. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1991), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Nickell, D. Nicolitsas, N. Dyden, Competition and Corportate Performance. Journal of Political Economy 104 (1996), 724–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Samuelson, S. Scotchmer, The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering. Yale Law Journal (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. A. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development. Oxford University Press (1934).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. Sergerstrom, Innovation, Imitation and Economic Growth. The Journal of Political Economy 99 (1991), 807–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Zachariadis, Research and Development, Innovation, and Technological Progress: A Test of the Schumpeterian Framework without Scale Effects. Canadian Journal of Economics, 36 (2003), 566–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shravan Luckraz
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of BusinessBond UniversityQueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations