Abstract
Risk analysis can be performed following either a quantitative or a qualitative approach. Both methodologies are linked to the same theoretical rules. Once the potential hazard has been identified, the qualitative risk assessment is carried out by combining the probabilities of occurrences of the events (emission and exposition) in the presence of a hazard, and its consequences. The probability of an event can be evaluated by combining the probabilities of the different parameters.
Within the frame of global expertise, the necessity of realizing collegial risk evaluations, sometimes when only few data are available and within a short amount of time, leads us to work on a standardised method for a qualitative approach.
The process of global qualitative risk appreciation is completed by adding support to the rationalisation of the estimation step. It has been proposed that each parameter be evaluated with the help of all available information and that an evaluation of the probability of occurrence of each of these can be realized individually to yield a given level of probability (null, negligible, low, moderate, high) or an interval between two levels (for example: ‘negligible to low’).
The combination of probabilities and of intervals was carried out using a table that was tested and evaluated through the following risk assessment: qualitative risk evaluations of the transmission of Q fever to humans in France.
Both the advantages and the limitation of this approach are also presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahl, A. S., Acree, J. A., Gipson, P. S., Mc Dowell, R. M., Miller, L., and McElvaine M. D. (1993). Standardisation of nomenclature for animal health risk analysis, Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 12, 1045–1053.
Anonymous (2002). Rapport sur le botulisme d’origine aviaire et bovine, Rapport réalisé par un groupe de travail du Comité d’experts spécialisé santé animale de l’Agence françcaise de sécurité sanitaire des aliments, 82 p.
Anonymous (2003). Rapport sur la rage des Chiroptères en France métropolitaine, réalisé par un groupe de travail du Comité d’expert spécialisé “santé animale” de l’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments, AFSSA, Maisons-Alfort.
Anonymous (2004). Rapport sur l’évaluation des risques pour la santé publique et des outils de gestion des risques en élevage des ruminants, réalisé par un groupe de travail du Comité d’expert spécialisé “santé animale” de l’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments, AFSSA, Maisons-Alfort.
Dufour, B., Moutou, F., and Hattenberger A. M. (2003). Qualitative and collegial risk analysis method: An example: Bats rabies transmission to man in France, In Proceedings of ISVEE 10th (Ed., S. Urcelay), pp. 1–4, ISVEE, Vina del Mar, Chile, November 16–21, 2004.
Gale, P., Young, C., Stanfield, G., and Oakes, D. (1998). Development of a risk assessment for BSE in the aquatic environment, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 84, 467–477.
Office international des épizooties (2001). Code zoosanitaire international: mammifères, oiseaux et abeilles, 10ème édition, OIE, Paris.
Pharo, H. J. (2002). Foot-and-mouth disease: An assessment of the risks facing New Zealand, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 50, 46–55.
Sutmoller, P., and Wrathall, A. E. (1997). A quantitative assessment of the risk of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease, bluetongue and vesicular stomatis by embryo transfer in cattle, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 32, 111–132.
Zepeda-Sein, C. (1998). Méthodes d’évaluation des risques zoosanitaires lors des échanges internationaux, In Séminaire sur la sécurité zoosanitaire des échanges dans les Caraïbes, 9–11 décembre 1997, Port of Spain, (Trinidad and Tobago), pp. 2–17, OIE, Paris.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Birkhäuser Boston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dufour, B., Moutou, F. (2007). Qualitative Risk Analysis in Animal Health: A Methodological Example. In: Auget, JL., Balakrishnan, N., Mesbah, M., Molenberghs, G. (eds) Advances in Statistical Methods for the Health Sciences. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4542-7_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4542-7_33
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-4368-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-4542-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)