Skip to main content

Qualitative Risk Analysis in Animal Health: A Methodological Example

  • Chapter
Advances in Statistical Methods for the Health Sciences

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

  • 2320 Accesses

Abstract

Risk analysis can be performed following either a quantitative or a qualitative approach. Both methodologies are linked to the same theoretical rules. Once the potential hazard has been identified, the qualitative risk assessment is carried out by combining the probabilities of occurrences of the events (emission and exposition) in the presence of a hazard, and its consequences. The probability of an event can be evaluated by combining the probabilities of the different parameters.

Within the frame of global expertise, the necessity of realizing collegial risk evaluations, sometimes when only few data are available and within a short amount of time, leads us to work on a standardised method for a qualitative approach.

The process of global qualitative risk appreciation is completed by adding support to the rationalisation of the estimation step. It has been proposed that each parameter be evaluated with the help of all available information and that an evaluation of the probability of occurrence of each of these can be realized individually to yield a given level of probability (null, negligible, low, moderate, high) or an interval between two levels (for example: ‘negligible to low’).

The combination of probabilities and of intervals was carried out using a table that was tested and evaluated through the following risk assessment: qualitative risk evaluations of the transmission of Q fever to humans in France.

Both the advantages and the limitation of this approach are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahl, A. S., Acree, J. A., Gipson, P. S., Mc Dowell, R. M., Miller, L., and McElvaine M. D. (1993). Standardisation of nomenclature for animal health risk analysis, Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 12, 1045–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous (2002). Rapport sur le botulisme d’origine aviaire et bovine, Rapport réalisé par un groupe de travail du Comité d’experts spécialisé santé animale de l’Agence françcaise de sécurité sanitaire des aliments, 82 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (2003). Rapport sur la rage des Chiroptères en France métropolitaine, réalisé par un groupe de travail du Comité d’expert spécialisé “santé animale” de l’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments, AFSSA, Maisons-Alfort.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anonymous (2004). Rapport sur l’évaluation des risques pour la santé publique et des outils de gestion des risques en élevage des ruminants, réalisé par un groupe de travail du Comité d’expert spécialisé “santé animale” de l’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments, AFSSA, Maisons-Alfort.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dufour, B., Moutou, F., and Hattenberger A. M. (2003). Qualitative and collegial risk analysis method: An example: Bats rabies transmission to man in France, In Proceedings of ISVEE 10th (Ed., S. Urcelay), pp. 1–4, ISVEE, Vina del Mar, Chile, November 16–21, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gale, P., Young, C., Stanfield, G., and Oakes, D. (1998). Development of a risk assessment for BSE in the aquatic environment, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 84, 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Office international des épizooties (2001). Code zoosanitaire international: mammifères, oiseaux et abeilles, 10ème édition, OIE, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pharo, H. J. (2002). Foot-and-mouth disease: An assessment of the risks facing New Zealand, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 50, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sutmoller, P., and Wrathall, A. E. (1997). A quantitative assessment of the risk of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease, bluetongue and vesicular stomatis by embryo transfer in cattle, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 32, 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zepeda-Sein, C. (1998). Méthodes d’évaluation des risques zoosanitaires lors des échanges internationaux, In Séminaire sur la sécurité zoosanitaire des échanges dans les Caraïbes, 9–11 décembre 1997, Port of Spain, (Trinidad and Tobago), pp. 2–17, OIE, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dufour, B., Moutou, F. (2007). Qualitative Risk Analysis in Animal Health: A Methodological Example. In: Auget, JL., Balakrishnan, N., Mesbah, M., Molenberghs, G. (eds) Advances in Statistical Methods for the Health Sciences. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4542-7_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics