Fuzzy Model Identification Based on Rough Set Data Analysis

Part of the Control Engineering book series (CONTRENGIN)


It is an open problem to model nonlinear systems with uncertainties. In Chapter 2, we developed an identification algorithm based on the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model. The fuzzy modeling procedure in Chapter 2 can be divided into three steps: premise structure identification, premise parameters identification, and consequent parameters identification. The premise structure identification procedure is done in two phases: (1) Identify the input structure, i.e., the significant input variables are identified among all possible input candidates; (2) assign fuzzy membership functions. In Chapter 2, we introduced an identification algorithm which included both phases in a uniform processes. We can also deal with them in two individual processes.


Artificial Neural Network Artificial Neural Network Modeling Fuzzy Rule Fuzzy Model Fuzzy Membership Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    M. Arima, E. H. Hara, and J. D. Katzberg, “Fuzzy logic and rough sets controller for HAVC systems,” Proceedings of IEEE WESCANEX 95 Conference on Communications, Power, and Computing, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, May 1995, pp. 133–138.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. C. Bezdek, Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1981.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    I. Düntsch and G. Gediga, “Statistical evaluation of rough set dependency analysis,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 589–604, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    I. Düntsch and G. Gediga, “Simple data filtering in rough set systems,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 18, no. 1–2, pp. 93–106, 1998.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    I. Düntsch and G. Gediga, “Uncertainty measures of rough set prediction,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 106, pp. 109–137, 1998.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    X. Feng, K. Katsuyama, and Y. Wang, “Self-learning based and adaptive modeling on estimation of rock slope stability,” Journal of the Mining and Materials Processing Institute of Japan, vol. 112, pp. 851–858, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. I. Funahashi, “On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 2, pp. 183–192, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    F. Hoppner, F. Klawonn, R. Kruse, and T. Runkler, Fuzzy Cluster Analysis: Methods for Classification. Data Analysis and Image Recognition, New York: John Wiley, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Li and H. Zhang, “Nonlinear system input structure identification based on rough set data analysis,” Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Melbourne, Australia, Dec. 2001, pp. 300–303.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Li and H. Zhang, “Identification of fuzzy model based on rough sets theory,” Journal of Northeastern University, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 480–483, Oct. 2000 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Li and H. Zhang, “Research on the method of neural network modeling based on rough sets theory,” ACTA Automatica Sinica, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–33, Jan. 2002 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Lin and G. A. Cunningham III, “Building a fuzzy systems from input-output data,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy System, vol. 2, pp. 243–250, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Y. Lin, G. A. Cunningham III, S. V. Coggeshall, and R. D. Jones, “Nonlinear system input structure identification: Two stage fuzzy curves and surfaces,” IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 678–684, Sept. 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Y. Lin, G. A. Cunningham III, and S. V. Coggeshall, “Input variable identification-Fuzzy curves and fuzzy surfaces,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 65–71, Aug. 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Chen and T. Toyota, “Multivalued neural network and the knowledge acquisition method by the rough sets for ambiguous recognition problem,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Beijing, China, Oct. 1996, pp. 736–740.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Z. Pawlak, Rough Sets-Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Sarkar and B. Yegnanarayana, “Application of fuzzy-rough sets in modular neural networks,” Proceedings of IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Anchorage, AK, Aug. 1998, pp. 741–746.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    H. Takagi and I. Hayashi, “NN-driven fuzzy reasoning,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 191–212, May 1991.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 2006

Personalised recommendations