Publication on Circumcision in the Medical Literature
The British Journal of Urology (BJU) was founded in 1929 by British urologists as an independent charitable company. Many specialist journals are owned either by their specialist associations or by a publisher. Neither situation applies to the BJU. This is an important distinction, bringing with it additional responsibilities for both the journal company and the editor. There have been five previous editors. I became editor in 1994 and was given a five-year term of office. The BJU Company appoints the editor who is then responsible for developing the journal in all its aspects. New developments, particularly those which have financial implications, must be approved by the BJU Company executive, who may take advice not only from the editor but also from the publishers and from any other outside expert that they choose.
KeywordsEthical Issue Rectal Prolapse Journal Company Male Circumcision Medical Indication
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Whitfield H, Hendry B, eds Notice of duplicate publication. BJU 1996;77:5.Google Scholar
- 6.Özdemir E. Significantly increased complication risks with mass circumcisions. BJU 1997;80:36–9.Google Scholar
- 7.Remondino PC. History of Circumcision from the Earliest Times to the Present. Philadelphia FA Davis Co. 1891. [Reprinted New York: AMS Press 1974.]Google Scholar
- 8.Wallerstein E. Circumcision: the uniquely American medical enigma. Urol CIin North Am 1985;12:123–32.Google Scholar
- 10.Kistler SL. Rapid bloodless circumcision of male and female and its technic. JAMA 1910;54:1782–3.Google Scholar
- 11.American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on the Fetus and Newborn. Standards and Recommendations for Hospital Care of Newborn Infants. 5th edition. Evanston Illinois: American Academy of Pediatrics. 1971:71. See a1so: Thompson HC, King LR, Knox E, Korones SB. Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1975;56:610–1.Google Scholar
- 12.Schoen EJ, Anderson G, Bohon C, Hinman F Jr, Poland RL, Wakeman EM. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1989;84:388–91.Google Scholar
- 14.Souther P. No one can claim to have a monopoly on deciding what is ethical. BMJ 1977;314:1477.Google Scholar