Advertisement

The History of Circumcision in the United States

A Physician’s Perspective
  • Morris L. Sorrells

Abstract

For most of its existence, the United States, with its overwhelmingly Protestant population of Northern-European descent, has had no tradition or history of circumcision. Medicalised circumcision did not appear until the latter part of the nineteenth century, when some members of the American medical establishment began to believe that circumcision could cure such wide-ranging real and fictitious diseases as insanity, masturbation, epilepsy, paralysis, hernia, hip-joint disease, tuberculosis, cancer, venereal disease, and headache, to name just a few. The belief in circumcision as a panacea has continued to this day, and the list of diseases that circumcision is said to prevent and cure has increased and changed to meet evolving national anxieties. As a result of the accumulated weight of these beliefs, a programme of universal, neonatal circumcision was instituted in many American hospitals during the Cold War era.

Keywords

Penile Cancer Urologic Complication Medical Guide Sexual Sensation American Doctor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hodges F. A short history of the institutionalization of involuntary sexual mutilation in the United States In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, eds Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York and London: Plenum Press 1997:17–40.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cockshut RW. Circumcision. BMJ 1935;2:764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell MF. The male genital tract and the female urethra. In: Campbell MF, Hamson JH, eds Urology. vol. 2. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. 1970;1836.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barlett FH. Infants and Children: Their Feeding and Growth. Revised edition. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, Inc. 1932:202.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    For an example of this sort of fearmongering, see: Weiss GN. Prophylactic neonatal surgery and infectious diseases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997;16:727–34 [here, p. 132.].PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morgan WKC. The rape of the phallus JAMA 1965;193:223–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foley JM. The male prepuce. JAMA 1961;175:1185–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foley JM. Circumcision. JAMA 1954;156:1636.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foley JM. The unkindest cut of all. Fact (July) 1966;3(4):2–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Preston EN. Whither the foreskin? A consideration of routine neonatal circumcision. JAMA 1970;213:1853–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marshall VF. Should circumcision of infant males be routine? Medical Record and Annals 1954;48:790–2.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spock B. The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care. New edition, completely revised. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce. 1957:155.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spock B. Circumcision—it’s not necessary. Dr. Spock now believes that circumcision of males is traumatic, painful and of questionable value. Redbook (April) 1989;172(6):53.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Committee On Fetus and Newborn. Standards and Recommendations for Hospital Care of Newborn Infants. 5th ed. Evanston: American Academy of Pediatrics. 1971:110.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thompson HC, King LR, Knox E, Korones SB. Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1975;56:610–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schoen EJ, Anderson G, Bohon C, Hinman F Jr, Poland RL, Wakeman EM. Report of the task force on circumcision. Pediatrics 1989;84:388–91.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Editor. AAP circumcision task force. AAP News (February) 1997;13(2):36.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stang HJ, Snellman LW. Circumcision practice patterns in the United States Pediatrics 1998;101(6): URL. http://www.pediatrics.org.cgi.content.full/l0l/6/e5.
  19. 19.
    Marshall FF. editorial comment to: Gearhart JP. Complications of pediatric circumcision. In: Marshall FF, ed. Urologic Complications: Medical and Surgica1, Adult and Pediatric. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc. 1986:387–96. [here, p. 395.].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gearhart JP. Complications of pediatric circumcision. In: Marshall FF, ed. Urologic Complications: Medical and Surgical, Adult and Pediatric Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc. 1986:387–96.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gearhart JP, Rock JA. Tota1 ablation of the penis after circumcision with electrocautery: a method of management and long-term followup. J Urol 1989;142:799–801.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Racher P. Grand jury to probe death of baby after circumcision. Des Moines Register (November 20, 1982):3A.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rogers P, Wallace R. Infant bleeds to death after being circumcised. Miami Herald (June 26, 1993):Bl–B2.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Associated Press Circumcision that didn’t heal kills boy. The boy’s circumcision wasn’t healing properly. News 5 Net (October 20, 1998): URL. http://www.newsnet5.com/news/stories/news-981020-05ll23.html.
  25. 25.
    Gellis SS. Circumcision. Am J Dis Child 1978;132:1168–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gellis SS. Circumcision. Am J Dis Child 1979;133:1079–80.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Werker PMN, Terng ASC, Kon M. The prepuce free flap: dissection feasibility study and clinical application of a super-thin new flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1075–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anand KJS, Hickey PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1321–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blass EM, Hoffmeyer LB. Sucrose as an analgesic for newborn infants Pediatrics 1991;87:215–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heitsch G. Swaddling Eases Circumcision. AAP News (July) 1997;13(7):3.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marchette L, Main R, Redick E, Bagg A, Leatherland J. Pain reduction interventions during neonatal circumcision. Nurs Res 1991;40:241–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ryan CA, Finer NN. Changing attitudes and practices regarding local analgesia for newborn circumcision. Pediutrics 1994;94:230–3.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiswell TE, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants Pediatrics 1985;75:901–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Winberg J, Gothefors L, Bollgren I, Herthelius M. The prepuce: a mistake of nature? Lancet 1989;1:598–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pisacane A, Graziano L, Mazzarella G, Scarpellino B, Zona G. Breast-feeding and urinary tract infection. J Pediutr 1992;120:87–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Coppa GV, Gabrielli O, Giorgi P, Catassi C, Montanari MP, Varaldo PE, Nichols BL. Preliminary study of breastfeeding and bacterial adhesion to uroepithelial cells. Lancet 1990;335:569–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gothefors L, Olling S, Winberg J. Breast feeding and biological properties of faecal E. coli strains. Acta Puediutr Scund 1975;54:807–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morris L. Sorrells

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations