Skip to main content

Comparison of Echodoppler and Clearance Method for the Evaluation of Renal Vascular Resistances

  • Chapter
Book cover Retransplantation

Part of the book series: Transplantation and Clinical Immunology ((TRAC,volume 29))

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

We studied 104 patients - 45 females, 59 males - aged 20 to 64 years (mean = 42.4±11.5 years). All patients were recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants. They received conventional immunosuppressive therapy (prednisolone, ciclosporine, azathioprine).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daoud, S. et al. (1997). Comparison of Echodoppler and Clearance Method for the Evaluation of Renal Vascular Resistances. In: Retransplantation. Transplantation and Clinical Immunology, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-38142-8_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-38142-8_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4937-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-38142-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics