Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pesticide Use Trends and Issues in the United States

  • Chapter
The Pesticide Question

Abstract

Pesticides have been used in U.S. agriculture since the late 1800s, but their use grew dramatically from the late 1940s to the early 1980s and then stabilized. The development and growing use of synthetic organic pesticides have been an integral part of a technological revolution in U.S. agriculture that increased productivity by 2.2 times between 1947 and 1988 (USDA, 1990). Growth in pesticide use has created many controversies about potential effects of pesticides on food safety, groundwater quality, worker safety, and wildlife mortality. The controversies reflect two major ideas: (1) using more pesticides is not necessarily a panacea for pest control, and (2) undesirable health or environmental effects of using some pesticides may outweigh their production benefits. Today, many people fear the risks of unknown or poorly understood hazards and are impatient with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) slow and deliberate resolution of pesticide controversies. There are also people arguing for a policy of limiting or reducing the overall level of pesticide use, which is a different approach than restricting or banning individual pesticides.

The author is an agricultural economist with the Resource and Technology Division, ERS, USDA, Washington, D.C. The views presented are those of the author and do not represent the official views of any agency or organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrilenas, Paul A. Farmers’ Use of Pesticides in 1971—Quantities. AER-252. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H.F. “Estimating the Marginal Productivity of Agricultural Pesticides: The Case of Tree-Fruit Farmers in the Okanogan Valley,” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 24,No. 2 (1976), pp. 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capalbo, S.M., and T.T. Vo. “A Review of the Evidence on Agricultural Productivity and Aggregate Technology,” in Agricultural Productivity Measurement and Explanation. Eds. S. M. Capalbo and J. Antle. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G.A. “Long-run Productivity of Pesticides,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 59,No. 3 (1977), pp. 543–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. “Farm Programs and Pesticide Demand,” unpublished manuscript, presented at Agricultural Economics Workshop, North Carolina State University, March 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Rachel, Silent Spring. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett Publications, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, John D., Jr., Lawrence S. Ebner, Charles A. O’Conner III, Christian Volz, Kenneth W. Weinstein, John C. Chambers, Alison A. Kerester, Stanley W. Landfair, Risa H. Rahinsky, and Elizabeth M. Weaver. Pesticide Regulation Handbook. New York: Executive Enterprises Publication Co. Inc., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, S.R. Cotton Agricultural Chemical Use and Farming Practices in 1989: An Overview of Results. AGES 9076, U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daberkow, Stan, and Katherine H. Reichelderfer. “Low-Input Agriculture: Trends, Goals, and Prospects for Input Use,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 70,No. 4 (1988), pp. 1159–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daberkow, Stan, LeRoy Hansen, and Harry Vroomen. “Resources: Low-Input Practices,” Agricultural Outlook. AO-148. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., Dec. 1988, pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M., and M. Hanthorn. Returns to Corn and Soybean Tillage Practices. AER-508. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., Jan. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichers, Theodore R., Paul A. Andrilenas, and Thelma W. Anderson. Farmers’ Use of Pesticides in 1976. AER-418. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ., Stat., Coop. Serv., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____, Paul Andrilenas, Robert Jenkins, and Austin Fox. Quantities of Pesticides Used by Farmers in 1964. AER-131. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____, Paul Andrilenas, Robert Jenkins, Helen Blake, and Austin Fox. Quantities of Pesticides Used by Farmers in 1966. AER-179. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, M.H., and K. Collins, “Effectiveness of Acreage Reduction Programs,” in Agricultural-Food Policy Review: Commodity Program Perspectives, AER-530, U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., 1985, pp. 166–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, W.L., “Cotton Pest Management Practices,” in Agricultural Resources: Inputs Situation and Outlook Report. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., AR-20, Oct. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, Leonard, P., and Catherine R. Greene. “The Use of Pesticides in the Production of Vegetables: Benefits, Risks, Alternatives and Regulatory Policies,” Vegetables and Specialties Situation and Outlook Report. TVS-245. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., Sept. 1985, pp. 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Mohinder, and Stan Daberkow, “Crop Sequences Among 1990 Field Crops and Associated Farm Program Participation,” in Agricultural Resources: Input Situation and Outlook Report. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., AR-24, Oct. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, J.M., R.F. Hepp, P.O. Mohn, and D.L. Vogelsang. Establishing and Operating Grower-Owned Organizations for Integrated Pest Management. PA-1180. U.S. Dept. Agr., Ext. Serv., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graebner, L., D.S. Moreno, and J.L. Baritelle. “The Fillmore Crop Protection District: A Success Story in Integrated Pest Management,” Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, Vol. 30,No. 1 (1984), pp. 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, C.R., R.A. Kramer, G.W. Norton, E.G. Rajotte, and R.M. MacPherson. “An Economic Analysis of Soybean Integrated Pest Management,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 67,No. 3 (1985), pp. 567–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D.E., W.F. Slife, and E.R. Swanson. “Economic Analysis of Herbicide Use in Various Crop Sequences,” Illinois Agricultural Economics, Vol. 17,No. 1 (1977), pp. 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headley, J.C. “Estimating the Productivity of Agricultural Pesticides,” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 50,No. 1 (1968), pp. 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. “Defining the Economic Threshold,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 50,No. 1 (1972), pp. 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ____. “Productivity of Agricultural Pesticides,” Economic Research on Pesticides for Policy Decisionmaking. U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., Apr. 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrandt, Patricia M. “The Economic Theory of the Use of Pesticides,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 13,No. 4 (1960), pp. 464–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop, J.A. Losses Occasioned by Insects, Mites, and Ticks in the U.S. E-444 U.S. Dept. Agr., Bur. of Ent. and Plant Quar., 1938, 57 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, W., and P.H. Schwartz. “ARS Research Program in Chemical Insect Control,” Agricultural Chemicals of the Future. Ed. J.L. Hilton. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, R.D., C.R. Taylor, J.B. Penson, and E.G. Smith. Economic Impact of Reduced Chemical Use. Knutson and Associates, College Station, TX, 1990, 72 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, W.F., and E.R. Swanson. “Insecticide Use and Crop Rotation Under Risk: Rootworm Control in Corn,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 65,No. 4 (1983), pp. 738–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.Y., and M. Langham, “A Simultaneous Equation Model of the Economic-Ecologic System in Citrus Groves,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 5,No. 1 (July 1973), pp. 175–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liapis, P.S., and L.J. Moffitt. “Economic Analysis of Cotton Integrated Pest Management Strategies,” Southern Journal of Agricultrual Economics, Vol. 15,No. 1 (1983), pp. 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, E., and D. Zilberman. “The Econometrics of Damage Control: Why Specification Matters,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 68,No. 2 (1986), pp. 261–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, C.L. “The Annual Loss Occasioned by Destructive Insects in the U.S.,” Yearbook of Department of Agriculture, 1904, pp. 461–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranowski, J.A. The Demand for Agricultural Crop Chemicals Under Alternative Farm Programs and Pollution Control Solutions. Ph.D. dissertation. Harvard Univ., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. Regulating Pesticides. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. Regulating Pesticides in Food: The Delaney Paradox. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, O. “Swedish Pesticide Policy in a Changing Environment,” The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, draft, 1991, 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., “Agroecology and Economics,” Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management Practice, Ed. M. Kogan, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____, “World Food Crisis: Energy and Pests,” Bull. Ent. Soc. Am. Vol. 20 (1976), pp. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., and C. Shoemaker, “An Economic and Land-Use Model for Reducing Insecticides on Cotton and Corn,” Environmental Entomology, Vol. 3,No. 1 (1974) pp. 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., and others. “Environmental and Economic Impacts of Reducing U.S. Agricultural Pesticide Use.” CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, Vol. 1, 2nd ed., Ed. David Pimentel, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1981, pp. 15–77. 1991, pp. 679–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, James W. “Farm Programs, Pesticide Use, and Social Costs,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 5,No. 2 (1973), pp. 155–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P.H., and W. Klassen. “Estimate of Losses Caused by Insects and Mites to Agricultural Crops,” CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, Vol. 1, Ed. David Pimentel. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1981, pp. 15–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. “Losses to Raw Agricultural Crops Attributed to Insect and Mite Pests,” unpublished manuscript, 1990, 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.F., J.L. Apple, and D.G. Bottrell. “The Origins of Integrated Pest Management,” Integrated Pest Management. Eds. J.L. Apple and R.F. Smith. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, V.M., R.F. Smith, R. Van den Bosch, and K. Hagen. “The Integrated Control Concept,” Hilgardia, Vol. 29,No. 2 (1959), pp. 81–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stults, H., E.H. Glade, Jr., S. Sanford, and L.A. Meyer. “Cotton: Background for 1990 Farm Legislation.” U.S. Dept. Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., Staff Report No. AGES 89-42, 1989, 82 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmedra, P.I., R.W. McClendon, and M.E. Wetzstein. “Risk Efficiency of Pest Management Strategies: A Simulation Case Study,” Transactions of the ASAE, Vol. 29,No. 6 (1988), pp. 1642–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpin, F.T. “Insect Insurance: Potential Management Tool for Corn Insects,” Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, Vol. 23,No. 3 (1977), pp. 181–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics, issues from 1944–1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. Agricultural Research Service. Losses in Agriculture. ARS-20-1, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. Agricultural Research Service. Losses in Agriculture. Ag. Handbook 291, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. Economic Research Service. Agricultural Resources: Inputs Situation and Outlook Report. AR-1, Feb. 1986; AR-5, Jan. 1987; AR-9, Jan. 1988; AR-13, Feb. 1989; AR-15; Aug. 1989; AR-17, Feb. 1990; and AR-20, Oct. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. Economic Research Service. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Production and Efficiency Statistics, 1988. ECIFS 8-5. Apr. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. Economic Research Service. Inputs Outlook and Situation Report. IOS-6, Nov. 1984 and IOS-2, Oct. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 1990 Field Crops Summary. Ag Ch 1 (91), March 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticide Industry Sales and Usage: 1987 Market Estimates. Feb. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC

    Craig Osteen

Authors
  1. Craig Osteen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

David Pimentel Hugh Lehman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osteen, C. (1993). Pesticide Use Trends and Issues in the United States. In: Pimentel, D., Lehman, H. (eds) The Pesticide Question. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-36973-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-36973-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-03581-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-36973-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation