Advertisement

Membranes for Hemodialysis

  • Clark K. Colton
  • Michael J. Lysaght

Abstract

Not only have the number and type of hemodialyis membranes proliferated over the past decade, but expectations of what a membrane should, and should not, do have altered to the extent that researchers and clinicians alike now find it difficult to understand the patient consequences of hemodialyzer membrane selection. The associated literature is extensive, e.g. Medline® contains over 1500 citations to hemodialysis membranes, but several comprehensive technical reviews are available (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). This chapter begins with a brief introduction and history. Then it describes and classifies currently available membranes and summarizes our current understanding of how a membrane’s physical properties and chemical structure determine its transport characteristics and biocompatibility

Keywords

Mass Transfer Coefficient Hollow Fiber Mass Transfer Resistance Nephrol Dial Transplant Hydraulic Permeability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lonsdale HK: The growth of membrane techology. J Mem Br Sci 10:81, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pusch W, Walch A: Synthetic membranes — preparation, structure, and applications. Angew Chem 21: 685, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ward RA, Feldhoff PW, Klein E: Membrane materials for therapeutic applications. in Materials Science of Synthetic Membranes, edited by Lloyd DR, ACS Symp Series. Washington, American Chemical Society, 1985 No 269, p 100Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goehl H, Konstantin P: Membranes and filters for hemofiltration. in Hemofiltration, edited by Henderson LW, Quellhorst EA, Baldamus CA, Lysaght M, Berlin, Springer, 1986, p 1211Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colton CK: Technical foundations of renal prosthesis, in: Uremia Therapy — Perspectives for the Next Quarter Century, edited by Gurland HJ, Berlin, Springer, 1987, p 187Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    von Sengbusch G, Lemke HD, Vienken J: Evolution of membrane technology; possibilities and consequences, in Uremia Therapy — Perspectives for the Next Quarter Century, edited by Gurland HJ, Berlin, Springer, 1987, p 187Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lysaght MJ: Hemodialysis membranes in transition, in Nephrology and Dialysis Update, edited by D’Amico G, Colasanti G. Contrib Nephrol, Vol 61, Basel, Karger, 1988, p 1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strathmann H, Goehl H: Membranes for blood purification — state of the art and new developments, in Terminal Renal Failure: Therapeutic Problems, Possibilities, and Potentials, edited by Klinkmann H, Smeby LC, Contrib Nephrol, Vol 78, Basel, Karger, 1990, p 119Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lysaght MJ, Baumeister U: Dialysis. Kirk Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, ed 4. 1993, Vol 8, p 59Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vienken J: Biocompatibility: what role does the haemodialysis membrane play? Biocompatibility Monograph EDTNA/ERCA 1993, 7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Radovich JM: Composition of polymer membranes for therapies of end stage renal disease. in Dialysis Membranes: Structure and Predictions, edited by Bonomini V, Berland Y, Contrib Nephrol, Vol 113, Basel, Karger, 1995, p 11Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolff WJ, Berk HT: De kunstmatige nier, een dialysator met groot oppervlak. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 87: 1684, 1943Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abel JJ, Rowntree LG, Turner BB: On the removal of diffusable substances from the circulation of living animals by dialysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 5: 275, 1914Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thalhimer W: Experimental exchange transfusions for reducing azotemia. Use of artificial kidney for this purpose. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 641, 1937Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Colton CK: A review of the development and performance of hemodialyzers. Special report of the AKCUP-NIAMD, 1967. Fed Clearinghouse Accession No PB 183-281Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ofsthun NJ, Colton CK, Lysaght MJ: Determinants of fluid and solute removal rates during hemofiltration. in Hemofiltration, edited by Henderson LW, Quellhorst EA, Baldamus CA, Lysaght MJ, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1986, p 17Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colton CK, Lowrie EG: Hemodialysis: physical principles and technical considerations. in The Kidney, 2nd ed, edited by Brenner BM, Rector FC, Vol II, Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1981, p 2425Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Colton CK, Smith KA, Merrill EW, Farrell PC: Permeability studies with cellulosic membranes. J Biomed Materials Research 5: 459, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klein E, Buffaloe G, Colton CK et al.: Evaluation of hemodialyzers and dialysis membranes. Nat Inst of Arthritis, Metabolism, and Digestive Diseases, NIH (1977). DHEW Publication No (NIH) 77-1294. Also, Artificial Organs 1:21, 1977Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Colton CK, Ward RA, Shaldon S: Scientific basis for assessment of biocompatibility in extracorporeal blood treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9(Suppl 2): 11, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lane DA, Bowry SK: Scientific basis for selection of measures of thrombogeneticity. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9(Suppl 2): 18, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson R: Complement activation during extracorporeal therapy: biochemistry, cell biology and clinical relevance. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9(Suppl 2): 36, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ward RA: The use phagocytic cell function as an index of biocompatibility. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9(Suppl 2): 9, 46Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goetze O: The role of basophilic leukocytes and mast cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9(Suppl 2): 57, 1994Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Colton CK: Analysis of membrane processes for blood purification. Blood Purif 5: 202, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baier RE, Dutton RC: Initial events in interaction of blood with foreign surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 3: 191, 1969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vroman L: The life of an artificial device in contact with blood: initial events and their effect on its final state. Bull NY Acad Med 64: 352, 1988Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brash JL, Scott CF, ten Hove P, Wojciechowski P, Colman RW: Mechanism of transient adsorption of fibrinogen from plasma to solid surfaces: role of the contact and fibrinolytic systems. Blood 71: 932, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saltzman EW, Merrill EW: Interaction of blood with artificial surfaces, in Hemostatis and Thrombosis, 2nd ed., edited by Colman RW, Hirsh J, Maider VJ, Salzmon EW, New York, Lippincott, 1987, p 1335Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Patarroyo M, Prieto J, Beatty PG, Clark EA, Gatimberg CG: Adhesion-mediating molecules of human monocytes. Cell Immunol 113: 278, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anderson JM, Bonfield TL, Ziats NP: Protein adsorption and cellular adhesion and activation on biomedical polymers. Int J Artif Organs 13: 375, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shaldon S: Dialyzer reuse: a practice that should be abandoned. Semin Dial 6: 11, 1993Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morrison DC, Ulevitch RJ: The effects of bacterial endotoxins on host mediation systems. Am J Pathol 93: 525, 1978Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kreger VE, Craben DE, McCabe WR: Gram-negative bacteremia. IV. Reevaluation of clinical features and treatment in 612 patients. Am J Med 68: 344, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Duma RJ: Gram-negative bacillary infections: pathogenic and pathophysiologic correlates. Am J Med 78: 154, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morrison DC, Ulevitch RJ: Endotoxins and disease mechanisms. Ann Rev Med 38: 417, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nany CA, Green SJ, Leiby DL et al.: Intercellular communication: macrophages and cytokines. in Molecular Aspects of Immune Response and Infectious Diseases, edited by Kiyoni H, Jinllo E, Desimone C, New York, Raven Press, 1990, p 47Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tetta C, Camussi G, Mariano F, Triolo G, Vercellone A: Immunomodulation and biomaterials. Biomat Art Cells & Immob Biotech 21: 253, 1993Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lysaght MJ: Evolution of hemodialysis membranes. in Dialysis Membranes: Structure and Predictions, edited by Bonomini V, Berland Y, Contrib Nephrol, Vol 113, Basel, Karger, 1995, p 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clark K. Colton
    • 1
  • Michael J. Lysaght
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringMassachusetts Inst. of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biology and MedicineBrown UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations