Advertisement

Indications For, Long Term Results and Limitations of Peritoneal Dialysis

  • David N. Churchill

Abstract

The technique of peritoneal lavage was first described as a novel treatment for recurrent ascites in 1744 (1). Mr Warrick, a surgeon from Cornwall, England drained large volumes of ascitic fluid from a 50 year old woman and replaced it with a bloodwarm mixture of equal parts of fresh Bristol water and a Bordeaux wine. Although the ascites disappeared for at least 1 month, the treatment had been associated with considerable pain. The Reverend Stephen Hales wrote a letter (2) suggesting a modification of this procedure which would cause less pain. This modification involved the use of two trochars, one for infusion and one for withdrawal of fluid, and is the first description of continuous peritoneal lavage.

Keywords

Peritoneal Dialysis Severe Acute Pancreatitis Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Warrick Ch: An improvement on the process of tapping; by which that operation instead of a relief for symptoms, becomes an absolute cure for ascites. Philos Trans R Soc Lond (Biol) 43:5, 1744–1745Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hales S: A method of conveying liquors into the abdomen during the operation of tapping. Philos Trans R Soc Lond (Biol) 43:8, 1744–1745Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ganter G: Uber die Beseitigung giftiger Stoffe aus dem Blute durch Dialyse (On the elimination of toxic substances from the blood by dialysis). Munch Med Wochenschr 50:1478, 1923Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Necheles H: Uber dialysieren des stromenden Blutes am Lebenden (On dialysis of the circulating blood in vivo). Klin Wochenschr 2:1257, 1923Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heusser H, Werder H: Untersuchungen uber die Peritoneal-dialyse (Investigations on peritoneal dialysis). Brun’s Beitr Klin Chir 141:38, 1927Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balazs J, Rosenak S: Zur behandlung der sublimatanurie durch peritoneale Dialyse (On the treatment of anuria caused by mercury bichloride with peritoneal dialysis). Wien klin Wochenschr 47:851, 1934Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wear JB, Sisk IR, Trinkle AJ: Peritoneal lavage in the treatment of uremia. J Urol 39:53, 1938Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rhoads JE: Peritoneal lavage in the treatment of renal insufficiency. Am J Med Sci 196: 642, 1938Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fine J, Frank HA, Seligman AM: The treatment of acute renal failure by peritoneal irrigation. Ann Surg 124: 857, 1946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frank HA, Seligman AM, Fine J: Treatment of uremia after acute renal failure by peritoneal irrigation. JAMA 130: 703, 1946Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seligman AM, Frank HA, Fine J: Treatment of experimental uremia by peritoneal irrigation. J Clin Invest 25: 211, 1946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fine J, Frank HA, Seligman AM: Further experiences with peritoneal irrigation for acute renal failure. Ann Surg 128:561, 1948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maxwell MH, Rockney RE, Kleeman CR, Twiss MR: Peritoneal dialysis. JAMA 170: 917, 1959Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jacob GB, Deane N: Repeated peritoneal dialysis by the catheter replacement method. Description of a technique and a replaceable prosthesis for chronic access to the peritoneal cavity. Trans Eur Dial Transplant Assoc 4: 136, 1964Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palmer RA, Quinton WE, Gray JE: Prolonged peritoneal dialysis for chronic renal failure. Lancet 1: 700, 1964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tenchkoff H, Schechter H: A bacteriologically safe peritoneal access device. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 14: 181, 1968Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Popovich RP, Moncrief JW, Dechard JB, Bomar JB, Pyle WK: The definition of a novel portable/wearable equilibrium peritoneal dialysis technique. Abstracts Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 5: 64, 1976Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Popovich RP, Moncrief JW, Nolph KD, Ghods AJ, Twardowski ZJ, Pyle WK: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann Intern Med 88: 449, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maiorca R, Cantaluppi A, Cancarini GC et al.: Prospective controlled trial of a Y connector and disinfectant to prevent peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Lancet 2: 642, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Canadian CAPD Clinical Trials Group: Peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; a multi-centre randomized clinical trial comparing the Y connector disinfectant system to standard systems. Peril Dial Int 9:159, 1989Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nolph KD: Update on peritoneal dialysis worldwide. Peril Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S15, 1993Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steele BT: Infant and neonatal peritoneal dialysis, in Dialysis Therapy, edited by Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus Inc, 1993, p 368Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Latta K, Offner G, Brodehl: Continuous peritoneal dialysis in children. Adv Perit Dial 8: 406, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ronco C, Brendolan A, Bragantini L et al.: Treatment of acute renal failure in newboms by continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Kidney Int 29: 908, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Posen GA, Luisello J: Continuous equilibration peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of acute renal failure. Perit Dial Bull 1: 6, 1980Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    American College of Physicians: Clinical competance in acute peritoneal dialysis. (Position paper) Ann Intern Med 108: 763, 1988Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bargman JM: Non-uremic indications for peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S159, 1993Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cairns KB, Porter GA, Kloster FE, Bristow JD, Griswold HE: Clinical and hemodynamic results of peritoneal dialysis for severe cardiac failure. Am Heart J 76: 227, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malach M: Peritoneal dialysis for intractable heart failure in myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 29: 61, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wall AJ: Peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. Med J Aust 2: 281, 1965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ranson JHC, Rifkind KM, Turner JW: Prognostic signs and non-operative peritoneal lavage in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 143: 209, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ranson JHC, Spenser FC: The role of peritoneal lavage in severe acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 187: 565, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ranson JHC, Berman RS: Long peritoneal lavage decreases peitoneal sepsis in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 211:708, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stone HH, Fabian TC: Peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of acute alcoholic pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 150: 878, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mayer AD, McMahon MJ, Corfield AP et al.: Controlled clinical trial of peritoneal lavage for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 312: 399, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lash RF, Burdette JA, Ozdil T: Accidental profound hypothermia and barbiturate intoxication: a report of rapid core rewarming by peritoneal dialysis. JAMA 201: 269, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davis FM, Judson JA: Warm peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of accidental hypothermia: report of five cases. N Z Med J 94: 207, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Troelsen S, Rybro L, Knudsen F: Profound accidental hypothermia treated with peritoneal dialysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 20: 221, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Horowitz BZ: The golden hour in heat stroke; use of iced peritoneal lavage. Am J Emerg Med 7: 616, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wogan JM: Enhancement of elimination, in Manual of Toxicologic Emergencies, edited by Noji EK, Kelen GD, Chicago, London, Boca Raton. Year Book Medical Publishers Inc. 1989Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Popovich R, Zengzhi H, Moncrief J: Peritoneal membrane plasmapheresis. Peril Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S82, 1993Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rosansky SJ, Richards FW: Use of peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of patients with renal failure and paraproteinemia. Am J Nephrol 5: 361, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Russell JA, Fitzharris BM, Corringham D, Darcy DA, Powles RL: Plasma exchange versus peritoneal dialysis for removing Bence Jones proteins. Br Med J 2: 1397, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zucchelli P, Pasquali S, Cagnoli L, Ferrari G: Controlled plasma exchange trial in acute renal failure due to multiple myeloma. Kidney Int 33: 1175, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wiegand C, Thompson T, Bock GH, Mathis RK, Kjellstrand CM, Mauer SM: The management of life-treatening hyperammonemia: a comparison of several therapeutic modalities. J Pediatr 96: 142, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Robert MF, Schultz DJ, Wolf B, Cochran WD, Schwartz AL: Treatment of a neonate with propionic acidemia and severe hyperammonemia by peritoneal dialysis. Arch Dis Child 54: 962, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Moreno-Vega A, Govantes JM: Methylmalonic acidemia treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. N Engl J Med 312: 1641, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Clow CL, Reade TM, Scriver CR: Outcome of early and long-term management of classical maple syrup urine disease. Pediatrics 68: 856, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Neu AM, Christenson MJ, Brusilow SW: Hemodialysis for inborn errors of metabolism. in Clinical Dialysis, edited by Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus Inc. p 341Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Canadian Organ Replacement Registry: 1991 Annual Report, Hospital Medical Records Institute, Don Mills, Ontario, April, 1993Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hamburger RJ, Christ PG, Morris PA, Luft FC: Hypertension in dialysis patients: Does CAPD provide an advantage? Adv Perit Dial 5: 91, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Leenen FHH, Smith DL, Khanna R, Oreopoulos DG: Changes in left ventricular hypertrophy and function in hypertensive patients started on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Heart 110: 102, 1985Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Parfrey PS, Harnett JD, Griffiths SM et al.: The clinical course of left ventricular hypertrophy in dialysis patients. Nephron 55: 114, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nissenson AR: Peritoneal dialysis in the geriatric patient: overview and introduction. Adv Perit Dial 6(Suppl 1): 1, 1990Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ross CJ, Rutsky EA: Dialysis modality selection in the elderly patient with end-stage renal disease: Avantages and disadvantages of peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial 6(Suppl 1): 11, 1990Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Maiorca R, Vonesh EF, Cavalli PL et al.: A multicentre, selection adjusted comparison of patient and technique survivals on CAPD and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 11: 118, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Maiorca R, Cancarini G, Brunori G et al.: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in the elderly. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S165, 1993Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    O’Brien M, Zimmerman S: Comparison of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in the elderly. Adv Perit Dial 6(Suppl 1): 65, 1990Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nolph KD, Lindblad AS, Novak JW, Steinberg SM: Experiences with the elderly in the National CAPD registry. Adv Perit Dial 6(Suppl 1): 33, 1990Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zimmerman SW: Diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: past, present and future. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S229, 1993Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    US Renal Data System: USRDS 1991 Annual Data Report, The National Institute od Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Am J Kidney Dis 18(Suppl 2): 49, 1991Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Luzar MA, Coles GA, Faller B et al.: Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infection in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. N Engl J Med 322: 505, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Flynn CT, Nanson JA: Intra-peritoneal insulin with CAPD: an artificial pancreas. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 25: 14, 1979Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tzamaloukas AH, Oreopoulos DG: Subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal insulin in the management of diabetics on CAPD. Adv Perit Dial 7: 81, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rottembourg J, Issad B, Allouache M: Insulin prescription, glycemic control and diabetic complications in diabetics treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S232, 1993Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wanless JR, Bargman JM, Oreopoulos DG, Vas SI: Subcapsular steatosis in response to peritoneal insulin delivery: a clue to the pathogenesis of steatonecrosis in obesity. Modern Pathology 2: 69, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Selgas R, Diez JJ, Monoz J et al.: Comparative study of 2 different routes for insulin administration in CAPD patients. A multicentre study. Adv Perit Dial 5: 181, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    McKinnie JJ, Bourgeois RJ, Husserl FE: Long term therapy for heart failure with continuous anbulatory peritoneal dialysis. Arch Intern Med 145: 1128, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kim D, Khanna R, Wu G et al.: Successful use of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in refractory heart failure. Perit Dial Bull 5: 127, 1985Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rubin J, Ball R: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis treatment for severe congestive heart failure in the face of chronic renal failure. Arch Intern Med 146: 1533, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Konig PS, Lhotta K, Kronenberg F, Joannidis M, Herold M: CAPD: a successful treatment for patients suffering from therapy-resistant congestive heart failure. Adv Perit Dial 7: 97, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Churchill DN, Taylor DW, Tomlinson CW, Beecroft ML, Gorman J, Stanton E: Effect of high-flux hemodialysis on cardiac structure and function among patients with end-stage renal failure. Nephron 65: 573, 1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Shilo S, Slotki IN, Iaina A: Improved renal function following acute peritoneal dialysis in patients with intractable congestive heart failure. IsrJ Med Sci 23: 821, 1987Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Twardowski ZJ, Nolph KD, Rubin J, Anderson PC: Peritoneal dialysis for psoriasis, an uncontrolled study. Ann Intern Med 88: 345, 1978Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Halevy S, Halevy J, Boner G, Rosenfeld JB, Feuerman EJ: Dialysis therapy for psoriasis. Report of three cases and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol 117: 69, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Twardowski ZB, Lempert KD, Lankhorst BJ et al.: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for psoriasis. A report of 4 cases. Arch Intern Med 146: 1177, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sobh MA, Abdel Rasik MM, Moustafa FE et al.: Dialysis therapy of severe psoriasis: a random study of 40 cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2: 351, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Nissenson AR, Rapaport M, Gordon A et al.: Hemodialysis in the treatment of psoriasis: a controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 91: 218, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Whittier FC, Evans DH, Anderson PC, Nolph KD: Peritoneal dialysis for psoriasis: a controlled study. Ann Intern Med 99: 165, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Anderson PC: Dialysis treatment of psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 117:67, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Myers C: The use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma. Semin Oncol 11: 275, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gokal R, Jakubowski C, King J et al.: Outcome in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: 4-year analysis of a prospective multicentre study. Lancet 2: 1105, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Burton PR, Walls J: Selection-adjusted comparison of life-expectancy of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis and renal transplantation. Lancet 1: 1115, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lunde Nm, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Guire KE: Comparison of mortality risk by choice of CAPD versus hemodialysis among elderly patients. Adv Perit Dial 7: 68, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Gentil MA, Carriazo A, pavon MI et al.: Comparison of survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hospital hemodialysis. A multicentric study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 6: 444, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Maiorca R, Cantaluppi A, Cancarini GC et al.: Prospective controlled trial of a Y connector disinfectant system to prevent peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Lancet 2: 642, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Canadian Clinical Trials group: Peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; a multicentre randomized clinical trial ccomparing the Y connector disinfectant system to standard systems. Perit Dial Int 9: 159, 1989Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Nolph KD, Cutler SJ, Steinberg SM, Novak JW, Hirschman GH: Factors associated with morbidity and mortality among patients on CAPD. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 33: 57, 1987Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Viglino G, Cancarini G, Catizone L et al.: Ten years of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: analysis of patient and technique survival. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppi 13): S175, 1992Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Charytan C, Spinowitz BS, Galler M: A comparative study of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and centre hemodialysis. Arch Intern Med 146: 1138, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Churchill DN, Taylor DW, Cook RJ et al.: Canadian hemodialysis morbidity study. Am J Kidney Dis 19: 214, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Teehan BP, Schleifer CR, Brown JM, Sigler MH, Raimondo J: Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome on CAPD. A five year longitudinal study. Adv Perit Dial 6: 181, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Popovich RP, Moncrief JW: Kinetic modeling of peritoneal transport. Contrib Nephrol 17: 59, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Teehan BP, Schleifler CR, Sigler MH, Gilgore GS: A quantitative approach to the CAPD prescription. Perit Dial Bull 5: 152, 1985Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Van Stone JC: The peak urea concentration hypothesis: a kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 9: 257, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gotch FA: Application of urea kinetic modeling to adequacy of CAPD therapy. Adv Perit Dial 6: 178, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Twardowski ZJ, Nolph KD: Peritoneal dialysis: How much is enough? Semin Dial 1: 75, 1988Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Blake PG, Balaskas E, Blake R, Oreopoulos DG. Urea kinetics has limited relevance in assessing adequacy of dialysis in CAPD. Adv Perit Dial 8: 65, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Blake PG, Somolos K, Abraham G, Weissgarten J, Pemberton R, Chu GL, Oreopoulos DG: Lack of correlation between urea kinetic indices and clinical outcomes in CAPD patients. Kidney Int 39: 700, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Teehan BP, Schleifer CR, Brown J: Urea kinetic modeling is an appropriate assessment of adequacy. Semin Dial 5: 189, 1992Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    DeAlvaro F, Bajo MA, Alvarez-Ude F et al.: Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: does Kt/V have the same predictive value as in HD? A multicentre study. Adv Perit Dial 8: 93, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Lameire NH, Vanholder R, Veyt D, Lambert MC, Ringoir S: A longitudinal five year survey of kinetic parameters in CAPD patients. Kidney Int 42: 426, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Prowant B et al.: Defining adequacy of peritoneal dialysis with urea kinetics. Adv Perit Dial 6: 173, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Brandes JC, Piering WF, Beres JA, Blumenthal SS, Fritsche C: Clinical outcome of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis predicted by urea and creatinine kinetics. Am Soc Nephrol 2: 1430, 1992Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Arkouche W, Delawari E, My H et al.: Quantification of adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 13): S215, 1993Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Lysaght MJ, Vonesh EF, Gotch F et al.: The influence of dialysis treatment modality on the decline of remaining renal function. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 37: 598, 1991Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Churchill DN, Thorpe K, Taylor DW, Keshaviah P for the CANUSA Study of Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 439, 1994Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Rubin J, Didlake R, Raju S, Hsu H: A prospective randomized evaluation of chronic peritoneal catheters. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 36: M497, 1990Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Khanna R, Nichols WK, Nolph KD: Long-term experience with Swan Neck Missouri catheters. Trans Am Soc Arif Intern Organs 36: M491, 1990Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Eklund BH, Honkanen EO, Kala AR, Kyllonen LE: Catheter configuration and outcome in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a prospective comparison of two catheters. Perit Dial Int 14: 70, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Moncrief JW, Popovich RP, Dasgupta M et al.: Reduction in peritonitis incidence in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with a new catheter and implantation technique. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 13): S329, 1993Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Herwaldt LA: Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage: role in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-associated infections. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S301, 1993Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Churchill DN: Comparative morbidity among hemodialysis patients and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 43(Suppl 40): S16, 1993Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Maher JF: Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S389, 1993Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis study Group: Canada-USA multicentre study of peritoneal dialysis adequacy: Description of the study population and preliminary results. Adv Perit Dial 1990Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Lameire N: Cardiovascular risk factors and blood pressure control in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S394, 1993Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Atkins RC, Wood C: Hyperlipidemia in CAPD. Perit Dial Int 13(Suppl 2): S415, 1993Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Pei Y, Hercz G, Greenwood C et al.: Non-invasive prediction of aluminum bone disease in hemo and peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 41: 1374, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Kleinman KS, Coburn JW: Amyloid syndromes associated with hemodialysis. Kidney Int 35: 567, 1980Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Cornelius F, Bardin T, Faller B et al.: Rheumatic syndromes and B-2-M amyloidosis in patients receiving long term peritoneal dialysis. Arthr Rheum 32: 785, 1989Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Benz RL, Siegfried JW, Teehan BP: Carpal tunnel syndrome in dialysis patients; comparison between continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis populations. Am J Kidney Dis 11: 473, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Lindholm B, Bergstrom J: Nutritional aspects on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 42(Suppl 42): S165, 1992Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Bergstrom J, Lindholm B: Nutrition and adequacy of dialysis. How do hemodialysis and CAPD compare? Kidney Int 43(Suppl 40): S39, 1993Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Young GA, Kopple JD, Lindholm B et al.: Nutritional assessment of CAPD patients. An international study. Am J Kidney Dis 17: 462, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Bouma SF, Dwyer JT: Glucose absorption and weight change in 18 months of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Am Diet Assoc 84: 194, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Heide B, Pierratos A, Khanna R et al.: Nutritional status of patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Bull 3: 138, 1983Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Schilling H, Wu G, Pettit J et al.: Nutritional status of patients on long-term CAPD. Perit Dial Bull 5: 12, 1985Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Soreide R, Dracup E, Svarstad E, Iversen BM: Increased total body fat during PD treatment. Adv Perit Dial 8: 173, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Lysaght MJ, Pollock CA, Hallet MD, Ibels IS, Farrell PC: The relevance of urea kinetic modeling to CAPD. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 35: 784, 1989Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Bargman JM: Complications of peritoneal dialysis related to increased intra-abdominal pressure. Kidney Int 43(Suppl 40): S75, 1993Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    O’Conner JP, Rigby RJ, Hardie IR et al.: Abdominal hernias complicating continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Nephrol 6: 271, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Benz RL, Schleifer CR: Hydrothorax in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: Successful treatment with intrapleural tetracyclene and a review of the literature. Am J Kidney Dis 5: 136, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT, Roos CM et al.: Leakage of dialysate across the diaphragm. An important complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Neth J Med 29: 242, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Pattison CW, Rodger DSC, Adu D, Michael J, Mathews HR: Surgical treatment of hydrothorax complicating continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Clin Nephrol 21: 191, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Berylne GM, Lee HA, Ralston AJ, Woolcock JA: Pulmonary complications of peritoneal dialysis. Lancet 2: 75, 1966Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Gomez-Fernandez P, Sanchez Agudo L, Calatrava JM et al.: Respiratory muscle weakness in uremic patients under continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron 36: 219, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Beasley CRW, Ripley JM, Smith DA, Neale TJ: Pulmonary function in chronic renal failure patients managed by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. New Zeal Med J 99: 313, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Rebuck AS: Peritoneal dialysis and the mechanics of the diaphragm. Perit Dial Bull 2: 109, 1982Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Pengally LD, Alderson AM, Milic-Emili J: Mechanics of the diaphragm. J Appl Physiol 30: 797, 1971Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Slingeneyer A, Canaud B, Mourad G et al.: Progressive sclerosing peritonitis, a late and severe complication of maintenance peritoneal dialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 12: 633, 1983Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Rottenbourg J, Gahl GM, Poignet JL et al.: Severe abdominal complications in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Proc Eur Dial Transpl Assoc 20: 236, 1983Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Rottenbourg J, Issad B, Langois P et al.: Loss of ultrafiltration and sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis during CAPD; Evaluation of the potential risk factors. Perit Dial Bull 4: 556, 1984Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Ponce PE, Pierratos A, Izatt S et al.: Comparison of the survival and complications of three permanent peritoneal dialysis catheters. Perit Dial Bull 2: 82, 1982Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Charytan C: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis after abdominal aortic graft surgery. Perit Dial Int 12: 227, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Gulanikar AC, Jindal KK, Hirsch DJ: CAPD after aortic graft surgery. Perit Dial Int 12: 399, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • David N. Churchill
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of NephrologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations