Advertisement

Case study: economics — the challenge of integrated pollution control

  • R. K. Turner
  • J. C. Powell

Abstract

Two important UK Government environmental initiatives have come to fruition in recent years: in September 1990 a major White Paper on the environment (This Common Inheritance) was published and in November 1990 the Environment Protection Bill went on to the statute book. From industry’s perspective the most important issue in the latter was the new system of Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) (as set out in DOE, IPC-A Practical Guide, DOE 1991). IPC is meant to be a multimedia approach to pollution control, such that in cases where substances are released to more than one environmental medium, the Best Practicable Environmental Option should be selected by the polluter. It still, however, retains the conventional technology-based approach to pollution control, based on the core concept of Best Available Technology Not Entailing Excessive Cost (BATNEEC).

Keywords

Waste Management Municipal Solid Waste Clean Technology Waste Reduction Economic Instrument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreottola, G. (1989) A method for the assessment of environmental impact of sanitary landfill, in Sanitary Landfill: Process, Technology and Environmental Impact (ed. T.G. Christensen), Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  2. Barlett, R.V. (1990) Comprehensive environmental decision making: can it work? in Environmental Policy in the 1990s: Toward a New Agenda (N.J. Vig and M.E. Kraft), CQ Press, Washington DC, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  3. Council on Economic Priorities (CEP) (1986) Hazardous Waste Management: Reducing the Risk, Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  4. Croft, B. and Campbell, D. (1990) Characterisation of 100 Landfill Sites, Harwell Waste Management Symposium 1990. Environmental Safety Centre, Harwell, pp. 13–19.Google Scholar
  5. Department of the Environment (DOE) (1986) Landfilling Wastes, Waste Management Paper No. 26, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  6. Fischoff, B., Lichenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S.L. and Keeney, R.L. (1981) Acceptable Risk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. James, D. (1985) Environmental economics, industrial process models, and regional-residuals management models, in Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics (eds A.V. Kneese and J.L. Sweeney), vol. 1, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 271–324.Google Scholar
  8. Kemp, R. et al. (1991) Policy Instruments to Stimulate Cleaner Technology. Paper presented at the EAERE Conference, Stockholm, June.Google Scholar
  9. Lave, L.B. and Malès, E.H. (1989) At risk: the framework for regulating toxic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol., 23, 386–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Loehr, R.C. (ed.) (1985) Reducing Hazardous Waste Generation, National Academy Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  11. McAllister, D.M. (1980) Evaluation in Environmental Planning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Maimone, M. (1985) An application of multi-criteria evaluation in assessing municipal solid waste treatment and disposal systems. Waste Management and Resources, 3, 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1977) In search of a useful theory of innovation. Res. Pol., 6, 36–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nijkamp, P. (1987) Mobility as a societal value: problems and paradoxes, in Transportation Planning in a Changing World (eds P. Nijkamp and S. Reichman), Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  15. Norton, G.A. (1984) Resource Economics, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  16. Organization for European Economic Co-operation (1985) Environmental Policy and Technical Change, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Organization for European Economic Co-operation (1987) Environmental Monograph No. 9: The Promotion and Diffusion of Clean Technology in Industry, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  18. Opschoor, J.B. and Pearce, D.W. (eds) (1991) Persistent Pollutants: Economics and Policy, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  19. Opschoor, J.B. and Vos, H.B. (1989) Application of Economic Instruments for Environmental Protection in OECD Countries, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  20. Parfitt, J. (1990) London’s hazardous wastes — a quantitative approach to regulation and planning. PhD Thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  21. Pearce, D.W. (ed.) (1991) Blueprint II, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  22. Pearce, D.W. and Nash, C.A. (1981) The Social Appraisal of Projects, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  23. Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (1984) The economic evaluation of low and non-waste technologies. Res. Conserv., 11, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pearce, D.W. and Markandya, A. (1989). The Benefits of Environmental Policy, Monetary Valuation, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  25. Pearce, D.W., Markandya, A. and Barbier, E.B. (1989) Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  26. Peãce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (1990) Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  27. Pearce, D.W., Barbier, E.B. and Markandya, A. (1990) Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants.Google Scholar
  28. Pearce, D.W. and Turner, R.K. (1991) The economics of solid waste management: a conceptual overview. CSERGE discussion paper, WM.91-04, University of East Anglia and University College, London.Google Scholar
  29. Powell, J.C. (1991) Approaches to the evaluation of energy from waste systems. PhD Thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  30. Sobral, M.M. et al. (1981) A multi-criteria model for solid waste management. J. Environ. Management, 12, 97–110.Google Scholar
  31. Turner, R.K. (1991a) Municipal solid waste management: an economic perspective, in The Treatment and Handling of Wastes, (eds A.D. Bradshaw, T.R.E. Southwood and F. Warner), Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
  32. Turner, R.K. (1991b) Benefits of PMP control: ecosystems, in Persistent Pollutants: Economics and Policy (eds J.B. Opschoor and D.W. Pearce), Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  33. Turner, R.K. and Bateman, I.J. (1990) A Critical Review of Monetary Assessment Methods and Techniques, Environmental Appraisal Group, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  34. Turner, R.K. and Powell, J.C. (1991) Towards an integrated waste management strategy. Environ. Management Health, 2, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Voogd, H. (1983) Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning, Pion, London.Google Scholar
  36. Walshe, G. and Daffern, P. (1990) Managing Cost Benefit Analysis, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  37. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© R.J. Berry 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. Turner
  • J. C. Powell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations