Abstract
The nature of the firm, as we understand it, is totally conditioned by themarket environment in which the firm is operating. This is true for the realas well as for the theoretical firm. In attempting to link the behavior of the firm to the growth process of a national economy, it thus becomes importantto present a theoretical firm that is as close as possible to a real firm of acapitalistically organized market economy. As we will see, this will forceus also to discuss economic growth in terms of a realistic model representation of the dynamics of firm behavior in markets, in fact, making aggregation endogenous and explicit.
This paper summarizes the results of a number of my recent studies, notably Eliasson (1987, 1988a, 1990a,b,c, 1991a,c).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Block, M. 1966. Land and Work in Medieval Europe. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Carlsson, B. 1980. “The Content of Productivity Growth in Swedish Manufacturing.” In The Firms in the Market Economy, 40 years 1939–1979. Stockholm: IUI.
Carlsson, B. 1983a. “Industrial Subsidies in Sweden: Macro-Economic Effects and an International Comparison.” Journal of Industrial Economics 32(1): 1–23.
Carlsson, B. 1983b. “Industrial Subsidies in Sweden: Simulations on a Micro-to-Macro Model.” In Microeconometrics, IUI Yearbook 1982–1983. Stockholm: IUI.
Carlsson, B. 1989. “The Evolution of Manufacturing Technology and Its Impact on Industrial Structure: An International Study.” Small Business Economy 1(1):21–37
Carlsson, B. 1991. “Productivity Analysis: A Micro-to-Macro Perspective.” In Technology and Investment—Crucial Issues for the 1990s. E. Deiaco, E. Hörnell,and G. Vickery, eds. London: Pinter.
Carlsson, B. 1992. “Industrial Dynamics and the Role of Small Plants in SwedishManufacturing Industry 1968–1988.” Paper presented at the conference on Management of Technology, Grenoble, October 13–14,1992, IUI Working Paper No. 348, Stockholm: IUI.
Carlsson, B., Dahmén, E., Grufman, A., Josefsson, M., and Örtengren, J. 1979. Teknik och industristruktur—70-talets ekonomiska kris i historisk belysning (Swedish Technology and Industrial Structure—the Crisis of the Seventies in Historic Perspective). Stockholm: IUI and IVA.
Carlsson, B., Bergholm, F., and Lindberg, T. 1981. Industristödspolitiken och dessinverkan på samhällsekonomin (Industry Subsidy Policy and its MacroeconomicImpact). Stockholm: IUI.
Chandler, A.D. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in AmericanBusiness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Day, R.H., Eliasson, G., and Wihlborg, C. (eds.). 1993. The Markets for Innovation, Ownership and Control. Amsterdam: North-Holland and Stockholm: IUI.
Eliasson, G. 1976. Business Economic Planning—Theory, Practice and Comparison. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Eliasson, G. 1977. “Competition and Market Processes in a Simulation Model of the Swedish Economy.” American Economic Review 67(1):277–281.
Eliasson, G. 1978. A Micro-to-Macro Model of the Swedish Economy. IUI Conference Reports 1978:1. Stockholm: IUI, p. 1.
Eliasson, G. 1983. “On the Optimal Rate of Structural Adjustment.” In PolicyMaking in a Disorderly World Economy. G. Eliasson, M. Sharefkin and B.-C. Ysander, eds. IUI Conference Reports 1983:1. Stockholm: IUI, p. 1.
Eliasson, G. 1984. “Micro Heterogeneity of Firms and the Stability of IndustrialGrowth.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5:249–274.
Eliasson, G. 1985a. The Firm and Financial Markets in the Swedish Micro-to-MacroModel—Theory, Model and Verification. Stockholm: IUI.
Eliasson, G. 1985b. “De svenska storföretagen—en studie av internationaliseringenskonsekvenser for den svenska ekonomin.” In De svenska storföretagen (The GiantSwedish Industrials). G. Eliasson et al. Stockholm: IUI, pp. 7–70.
Eliasson, G. 1986a. “On the Stability of Economic Organizational Forms and the Importance of Human Capital: A Proposition about the Endogenous, MarketInduced Disintegration of the Non-Market Sector.” In The Dynamics of MarketEconomies. R.H. Day, and G. Eliasson, eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland and Stockholm: IUI, pp. 454–467.
Eliasson, G. 1986b. “Kompetens, kommunikation och kunskapsuppbyggnad—sammanfattning och arbetshypotes för industripolitiken.” In Kunskap, information och tjänster (The Manufacturing Firm as an Information Processer andService Producer). G. Eliasson, B. Carlsson, E. Deiaco, T. Lindberg, and T. Pousette, eds. Stockholm: IUI, pp. 9–38.
Eliasson, G. 1987. “Technological Competition and Trade in the ExperimentallyOrganized Economy,” IUI Research Report No. 32. Stockholm: IUI.
Eliasson, G. 1988a. “Schumpeterian Innovation, Market Structure and the Stabilityof Industrial Development.” In Evolutionary Economics, Applications of Schumpetefs Ideas. H. Hanusch, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–199.
Eliasson, G. 1988b. “The International Firm: A Vehicle for Overcoming Barriersto Trade and a Global Intelligence Organization Diffusing the Notion of a Nation.” IUI Booklet No. 295. Stockholm: IUI.
Eliasson, G. 1990a. The Knowledge Based Information Economy. In Eliasson, G. et al. The Knowledge Based Information Economy. Stockholm: IUI.
Eliasson, G. 1990b. “The Firm as a Competent Team.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 13(3):275–298.
Eliasson, G. 1990c. “The Firm, its Objectives, its Controls and its Organization.” IUI Working Paper No. 266. Stockholm: IUI.
Eliasson, G. 1991a. “Deregulation, Innovative Entry and Structural Diversity as a Source of Stable and Rapid Economic Growth.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics (1):49–63.
Eliasson, G. 1991c. “Modeling the Experimentally Organized Economy; Complex Dynamics in an Empirical Micro-Macro Model of Endogenous Economic Growth.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 16(1–2):153–182.
Eliasson, G. 1991d. “The Micro Frustrations of Privatizing Eastern Europe.” IUI Working Paper No. 306. Stockholm: IUI.
Eliasson, G. 1991e. “Financial Institutions in a European Market for ExecutiveCompetence”. In C. Wihlborg, M. Fratianni and T.D. Willetts, eds. Financial Regulation and Monetary Arrangements after 1992. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 149–166.
Eliasson, G. 1992a. “Business Competence, Organizational Learning and EconomicGrowth-Establishing the Smith-Schumpeter-Wicksell (SSW) Connection.” In Entrepreneurship, Technological Innovation, and Economic Growth. Studies in the Schumpeterian Tradition. F.M. Scherer and M. Perlman, eds. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Eliasson, G. 1992c. “A Note: On Privatization, Contract Technology and Economic Growth.” IUI Working Paper No. 339, Stockholm. To appear in R.H.Day, G. Eliasson and C. Wihlborg, eds. (1993).
Eliasson, G., and Lindberg, T. 1981. “Allocation and Growth Effects of CorporateIncome Taxes.” In Business Taxation, Finance and Firm Behavior. G. Eliassonand J. Sodersten, eds. IUI Conference Reports 1981:1, Stockholm: IUI, pp. 381–435.
Eliasson, G., and Taymaz, E. 1992. “The Limits of Policy Making: An Analysis of the Consequences of Boundedly Rational Government using the Swedish Micro-to-Macro model (MOSES).” IUI Working Paper No. 333. Stockholm: IUI.
Granstrand, O. 1986. “On Measuring and Modelling Innovative New Entry in Swedish Industry.” In The Dynamics of Market Economies. R.H. Day and G. Eliasson, eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland and Stockholm: IUI, pp. 295–310.
Granstrand, O., and Sjölander, S. 1990. “The Acquisition of Technology and Small Firms by Large Firms.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 13(3):367–386.
Holmström, B. 1989. “Agency Costs and Innovation.” Journal of Economic Behaviorand Organization 12(3):305–327.
Jagren, L. 1988. “Företagens tillväxt i ett historiskt perspektiv.” In Expansion,avveckling och företagsvardering i svensk industri. J. Örtengren et al. Stock-holm: IUI.
Knight, F. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Lindh, T. 1993. “Lessons from Learning About Rational Expectations.” In R.H. Day, G. Eliasson and C. Wihlborg, eds. (1993), pp. 81–115.
Loasby, B J. 1991. “Alfred Marshall’s Connecting Principles of Firms and Markets.” Paper presented to the RES Annual Conference, University of Warwick, April 8, 1991.
Mill, J.S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London.
North, D., and Thomas, P. 1973. The Rise of the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pratten, C. 1976. A Comparison of the Performance of Sweden and UK Companies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Salter, W.E.G. 1960. Productivity and Technical Change. Cambridge, UK: Cam-bridge University Press.
Schumpeter, J.A. 1912. (English edition 1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard Economic Studies, Vol. XLVI. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J.A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Simon, H.A. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69:99–118.
Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library, 1973.
Stigler, G.J. 1951. “The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market.” Journal of Political Economy 59:185–193.
Wicksell, K. 1898. Geldzins und Güterpreise (Interest and Prices). New York: AMK Bookseller, 1965.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eliasson, G. (1994). The Theory of the Firm and the Theory Of economic Growth. In: Magnusson, L. (eds) Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian Approaches to Economics. Recent Economic Thought, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-35155-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-35155-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-9385-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-585-35155-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive