Advertisement

The Unit That Evolves: Linking Self-Reproduction and Self-Interest

  • Michael Hutter
Part of the Recent Economic Thought book series (RETH, volume 36)

Abstract

It has again become fashionable among economic theorists to model economic development as an evolutionary process. The concept has been used successfully to explain the origin and the development of biological, including human, beings. Although social scientists know that the insights into biological development gained cannot be transferred naively to their subject of observation, the paradigm is too tempting to be left to the colleagues in the natural sciences.

Keywords

Genetic Program Life Form Evolutionary Approach Spontaneous Order Social Person 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Baecker, D. 1987. “Das Gedachtnis der Wirtschaft.” In: Theorie als Passion. Niklas Luhmann zum 60. Geburtstag. D. Baecker et al., eds. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 519–556.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson, G. 1979. Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  4. Blaseio, H. 1986. Das Kognos-Prinzip. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  5. Boland, L.A. 1978. “Time in Economics vs. Economics in Time: The Hayek Problem.” Canadian Journal of Economics 240–262.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J. 1987. “The Constitution of Economic Policy.” AER.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, J.S. 1981. The Asymetric Society.Google Scholar
  8. Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. v. Foerster, H. 1981. Observing Systems. Seaside Intersystems.Google Scholar
  10. v. Hayek, F.A. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1; Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hofstadter, D. 1979. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Hutter, M. 1994a. “Organism as a Metaphor in German Economic Thought.” In Markets Read in Tooth and Claw. P. Mirowski, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, in print.Google Scholar
  13. Hutter, M. 1994b. “Communication in Economic Evolution: The Case of Money.” In Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics. R. England, ed. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Press, in print.Google Scholar
  14. Hutter, M. 1989. Die Produktion von Recht. Eine selbstreferentielle Theorie und der Fall des Arzneimittelpatentrechts. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  15. Lumsden, C.J., and Wilson, C.O. Genes, Mind and Culture. The Co-Evolutionary Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Luhmann, N. 1983. “Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft als autopoietisches System”. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 13.Google Scholar
  17. Luhmann, N. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  18. Luhmann, N. 1986. “The Individuality of the Individual: Historical Meaning and Contemporary Problems.” In Reconstruction Individualism. T.C. Heller et al., eds. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 13–354.Google Scholar
  19. Luhmann, N. 1987. “Tautologie und Paradoxie in den elbstbeschreibungen der modernen Gesellschaft.” Zeitschrift für Sociologie.Google Scholar
  20. Luhmann, N. 1988. Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. Maturana, H.R. 1981. “Autopoiesis.” In Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organization. M. Zeleny, ed. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  22. Maturana, H., Uribe, R., and Varela, F. 1974. “Autopoiesis, the Organization of Living Systems: Its Characterization and a Model.” Biosystems, 5:187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelson, R., and Winter, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  24. Röpke, J. 1977. Strategic der Innovation. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  25. Roth, G. 1982. “Conditions of Evolution and Adaptation in Organisms as Autopoietic Systems.” In Environmental Adaptation and Evolution. D. Mossakowski and G. Roth, eds. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
  26. Russell, B. 1961. History of Western Philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  27. Schotter, A. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Schumpeter, J.A. 1912. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  29. Spencer-Brown, G. 1969. The Laws of Form. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  30. Teubner, G. 1987a. “Unitas Multiplex. Probleme einer Konzernverfassung in system-theoretischer Sicht.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  31. Teubner, G. 1987b. State, Law and Economy as Autopoietic Systems. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  32. Varela, F.J. 1981. Principles of Biological Autonomy. North Holland: New York.Google Scholar
  33. Williamson, O. 1987. “The Contractual Logic of Internal Organization.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  34. Witt, U. 1987. Individualistische Grundlagen der Evolutorischen Ökonomik. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  35. Wittgenstein, L. 1971. Philosophische Untersuchungen (1958). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Hutter
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehretuhl fur Theorie der WirtschaftWirtschaftswissanschaftliche FakultätWitten-RudinghausenGermany

Personalised recommendations