Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought ((RETH,volume 36))

Abstract

All evolution is concerned with the growth of knowledge, a proposition no less true in economic systems (and society in general) than in biological ones. As the philosopher Elliott Sober (1984) notes, evolutionary theory is a theory of forces, that is, a theory of the causes of change, of the processes that produce a certain sequence of events and entities. Hayek (1945, p. 523) proposed that “economic problems arise always and only in consequence of change.” This implies that evolutionary theory is one way of studying economic problems. What is the evolutionary explanation in economics? How does it differ from the orthodox, that is, the neoclassical, explanation? The essay is an attempt to answer these questions by looking at the history and present state of evolutionary thinking in economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, A. 1950. “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58:211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. 1953. “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm: Comment.” American Economic Review 43(4):600–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A., and Woodward, S. 1988. “The Firm is Dead; Long Live the Firm: A Review of Oliver E. Williamson’s The Economic Institutions of Capitalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 26(1):65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, KJ. 1959. “Towards a Theory of Price Adjustment.” In The Allocation of Economic Resources. Moses Abramovitz, ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W.B. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Small Events.” The Economic Journal 99:116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. 1987. “The entrepreneur’s Reward for Self-Policing.” Economic Inquiry 25:103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1976. “Altruism, Egoism and Genetic Fitness: Economics and Sociobiology,” Journal of Economic Literature 14:817–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica (N.S.) 4:386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C. 1979. “The Problem of Externality.” Journal of Law and Economics 22:141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1975. Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection: Being the Second Part of His Big Species Book Written from 1856 to 1858. R.C. Stauffer, ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 75:332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., and Gould, S.J. 1972. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology. T.J.M. Schopf, ed. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Co., pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enke, S. 1951. “On Maximizing Profits: A Distinction Between Chamberlin and Robinson.” American Economic Review 41:566–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1983. Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. 1989. “Darwin and Political Economy: The Connection Reconsidered.” Journal of the History of Biology 22(3):437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 1977. Ever Since Darwin. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 1986. “The Panda’s Thumb of Technology.” Natural History 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., and Lewontin, R.C. 1984. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. E. Sober, ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamowy, R. 1987. The Scottish Enlightenment and the Theory of SpontaneousOrders. Carbondale, IL: Illinois State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., and Freeman, J. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: HarvardUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American EconomicReview 35(4):519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1952. The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Volume I: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1979. The Counter-Revolution of Science, 2nd edn. Indianapolis, In: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, R. 1986. The Worldly Philosophers, 6th ed. New York: Touchstone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1977. “Economics from a Biological Viewpoint.” Journal of Law and Economics 15:1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1982. “Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperationversus Conflict Strategies.” Research in Law and Economics 4:1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. 1991. “Economic Evolution: Intervention Contra Pangloss.” Journal of Economic Issues 25:519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L. 1989. The Metaphysics of Evolution. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1980. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and the Posthumous Essays. Indianapolis, In: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1992. A Treatise of Human Nature. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.L. 1987. The European Miracle: Environments, Economics, and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M., and Shapiro, C. 1985. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility.” American Economic Review 75:424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., Crawford, R.G., and Alchian, A. 1978. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process.” Journal of Law and Economics 21(2): 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 1983. “Systems Theory, Knowledge, and the Social Sciences.” In The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages. F. Machlup and U. Mansfield, eds. New York: John Wiley, pp. 581–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 1984. “Internal Organization in a Dynamic Context: Some Theoretical Considerations.” In Information and Communications in Economics: New Perspectives. M. Jussawalla and H. Ebenfield, eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 1986. “Rationality, Institutions, and Explanation.” In Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics. R.N. Langlois, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 1988. “Economic Change and the Boundaries of the Firm.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 144:635–657, reprinted in Bo Carlsson, ed., Industrial Dynamics: Technological, Organizational, and Structural Changes in Industries and Firms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, pp. 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 1992. “Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time.” Industrial and Corporate Change 1(1):99–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. 1993. “Orders and Organizations: Toward an Austrian theory of Social Institutions.” In Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. B. Caldwell and S. Boehm, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N., and Everett, M.J. 1992. “Complexity, Genuine Uncertainty and the Economics of Organization.” Human Systems Management 11(2):67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N., and Koppl, R. 1991. “Fritz Machlup and Marginalism: A Reevaluation,” Methodus 3(2): 86–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N., and Robertson, P.L. 1989. “Explaining Vertical Integration: Les-sons from the American Automobile Industry.” Journal of Economic History 49:361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N., and Robertson, P.L. 1992. “Networks and Innovation in a Modular System: Lessons from the Microcomputer and Stereo Component Industries.” Research Policy 21(4): 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1984. “Adaptation.” In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. E. Sober, ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S.J., and Margolis, S.E. 1990. “The Fable of the Keys.” Journal of Law and Economics 33(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B.J. 1986. “Organization, Competition, and the Growth of Knowledge.” In Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics. R. Langlois, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1982. Principles of Economics, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Porcupine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1988. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. 1963. Problems of Economics and Sociology. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L. 1982. “Biological Theory and Technological Entrepreneurship in Marshall’s Writings.” Eastern Economic Journal 8(1):3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. 1977. “In Search of More Useful Theory of Innovation.” Research Policy 5:36–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T. 1952. “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm.” American Economic Review 42:211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, R.A. 1945. “The Economic Organization of a P.O.W. Camp.” Economica 12:189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, N. 1989. Rules and Institutions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. New York: Cam-bridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A. 1986. “The Evolution of Rules.” In Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics. R.N. Langlois, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweber, S.S. 1977. ‘The Origin of the Origin Revisited,” Journal of the History of Biology 10(2):229–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweber, S.S. 1980. “Darwin and the Political Economists,” Journal of the History of Biology 13(2):195–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. 1959. “Explanation and Prediction in Evolutionary Theory.” Science 130:447–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, M. 1984. Enterprise and the Scope of the Firm. London: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg, G. 1988. “Modelling Economic Dynamics and Technical Change: Mathematical Approaches to Self-Organisation and Evolution.” In Technical Change and Economic Theory. G. Dosi et al., eds. London: Frances Pinter, pp. 531–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverberg, G., Dosi, G., and Orsenigo, L., 1988. “Innovation, Diversity and Diffusion: A Self-Organisation Model.” Economic Journal 98:1032–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1990. “A Mechanism for Social Selection and Successful Altruism.” Science 250:1665–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. ed. 1984a. Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. 1984b. The Nature of Selection. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K., and Kitcher, P. 1991. “The Return of the Gene.” In The Philosophy of Science. R. Boyd, P. Gasper, and J.D. Trout, eds. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. 1986. The Economics of Rights, Cooperation, and Welfare. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 1980. “Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1(3): 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, DJ. 1982. “Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3:3–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, DJ. 1986. “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy.” Research Policy 15:285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, B. 1991. “Alfred Marshall on Economic Biology.” Review of Political Economy 3(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M.L., and Anderson, P. 1986. “Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 31:419–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, E. 1977. The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, E. 1978. “Invisible Hand Explanations,” Synthese 39:282–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. 1986. “Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules: A Critical Examination of F.A. Hayek’s Theory of Cultural Evolution.” Economics and Philosophy 2(1):75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. 1980. The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S.G. 1964. “Economic ‘Natural Selection’ and the Theory of the Firm.” Yale Economic Essays 4:225–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. 1985. “Coordination of Individual Economic Activities as an Evolving Process of Self-Organization.” Economie Appliquee 37:569–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. 1989. “The Evolution of Economic Institutions as a Propagation Process.” Public Choice 62:155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. 1992. “Evolutionary Economics: An Interpretative Survey.” Paper presented at the J.A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Kyoto, Japan, August, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. 1984. “Functions,” In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. E. Sober, ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1931. “Evolution in Mendelian Populations.” Genetics 16:97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1945. “Tempo and Mode in Evolution: A Critical Review.” Ecology 26: 415–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 4: Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V.C. 1962. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langlois, R.N., Everett, M.J. (1994). What Is Evolutionary Economics?. In: Magnusson, L. (eds) Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian Approaches to Economics. Recent Economic Thought, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-35155-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-35155-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-9385-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-35155-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics