In Thailand unions under the Labor Relations Act of 1975, the basic statute dealing with labor-management relations, are divided into three levels: trade unions, workers’ federations, and workers’ congresses. Prior to the 1991 coup, at the federation level, unions had a significant degree of leverage with the government, especially during periods of political certainty. In terms of issues directly affecting workers, the key issue was the minimum wage. Beyond this, organized labor activity was directed at promoting the interests of powerful groups supporting their interests. State enterprise unions wielded a strong influence on management and the government, forcing it to abandon its privatization policy. They were also able to influence transfers and appointments of key managers.1


Minimum Wage Collective Bargaining Industrial Relation Union Membership Union Leader 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Labour and wages. (1990). Business International Forecasting, 5, 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Labor rights to be restored. (1994). Bangkok Post, 9, 11.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Vause, G.W. (1992). Labor relations in Thailand. East Asian Executive Reports, 14, 11, 9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Industrial labour. (1995). Investing, Licensing & Trading, 1, 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piriyarongsan, S. & Poonpanich, K. (1994). Labour institutions in an export-oriented country: A case study of Thailand. In G. Rodgers (Ed.), Workers, Institutions, and Economic Growth in Asia (p. 230). Geneva: International Institute of Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cabinet approves bill on enterprise labour relations.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soul-searching: issues facing Thai workers. (1994). Bangkok Post, 5, 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sukpanich, T. (1994). Call for action on labour, health and safety. Bangkok Post, 5, 1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Piriyarongsan & Poonpanich, op. cit., 221.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bangkok Post, Sept. 11, 1994, op. cit.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ministry tells company to reinstate workers. (1995). Bangkok Post, 1, 21.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minister gets details of labour problems. (1995). Bangkok Post, 2, 9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piriyarongsan & Poonpanich, op. cit., 228.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bangkok Post, May 1, 1994, op. cit.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nontarit, W. (1995). Labour leaders ask government not to forget workers. Bangkok Post, 1, 3, 3.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vause, op. cit.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Infighting blamed for Thai labour movement weakness. (1994). Bangkok Post, 11, 28.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Piriyarongsan & Poonpanich, op. cit., 233.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Business International Forecasting, op. cit.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Piriyarongsan & Poonpanich, op. cit., 235–236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1997

Personalised recommendations